He didn’t win the fight. Idc what that link says.No it wasn't, super close fight that could have gone either way.
UFC Fight Night 237, February 24th, Mexico City, Mexico
- Thread starter kickserv
- Start date
1. No it was not a bad decision, not even close, that fight could have gone either way, super close fight.
2. Not sure what fights you have been watching but all fights that have gone to decision have been legit decisions by the judges. Perhaps you are watching a different Fight Card, because I have no idea what you are talking about.
Click on the link, you can see the result was all over the place, it WAS NOT A BAD DECISION AT ALL....it could have gone either way.
I don't know what fight you were watching?
So, how does a guy who is taken down repeatedly and on his back in 2 of three rounds win? Please explain. Bad decision.1. No it was not a bad decision, not even close, that fight could have gone either way, super close fight.
2. Not sure what fights you have been watching but all fights that have gone to decision have been legit decisions by the judges. Perhaps you are watching a different Fight Card, because I have no idea what you are talking about.
What fights are you watching? Because all the fights that have gone to the judges have been legit, there has no been one "crooked decision".
Because he did next to nothing when he was on the ground, it was NOT A BAD DECISION, it could have gone either way.
Barcelos a big heart. He had to finish it, and he did. Beauty of a leg sweep that led to that RNC.
The +145 underdog had it all wrapped up, he was winning......and then he gets submitted in round 3.
Fuck Me
That’s a shame. All Quinonez had to do was stay on his feet. He easily won the first two rounds.The +145 underdog had it all wrapped up, he was winning......and then he gets submitted in round 3.
Fuck Me
