Saddam now admits to mass genocide - GO W!!

[CHARLESMANSON]

George W. Bush, thank you for removing this monster mass murderer!! It had to be done!! :clap: If the sissy liberals had it thier way, Saddam, the Hitler of our time, would still be in power raping, killing and torturing innocent people.


*According to the Iraqi President, Saddam Hussein has now confessed to hundreds of thousands of killings and other crimes committed during his regime, including the massacre of thousands of innocent Kurds.

*Saddam has officially admitted to "Anfal," the codename for the 1988 campaign which led to the deaths of about 182,000 innocent Kurds and the destruction of "dozens of Kurdish villages."

*Over 400,000 mass graves have been uncovered in Iraq so far. A large portion of them contained innocent women and children who's hands were tied behind their backs and bullet holes were found in their skulls.

GOD BLESS GEORGE W. BUSH!!! Finally a president with some balls to do the right thing!! That's why he was re-elected. You liberals can cry and fuss all you want....50 Million people have been liberated...you're just upset because the liberals aren't a part of it. :clap:

NOTE *INSERT ALL ANGRY LEFTIST LIBERAL ATTACKS BELOW ........V V V V V....let 'em rip!!! :clap: Have fun!!

 

[Master Capper]

Your grasping for straws

 

[Palehose]

Ah yes 400,000 dead innocent men women and children is grasping for straws yet a Mandatory evac order not followed and creating havoc is the Administrations fault .....so goes the Liberal Mindset ...a sad one indeed !

 

[StevieD]

Was there ever a doubt Sadam did that? I wonder who okayed it when it happened?

 

[Master Capper]

Is this the new justification for going to war with Iraq since all other reasons put forth by the administration have been shown to be untrue? Are we now in the business again of removing dictators whom brutalize their people and nation building? Will we next go to the Sudan or how about Uganda where 1.6 million people have been killed, or even closer to home Colombia?

 

[Pujo21]

Boy , how fast do they forget these same Iraqui people said death to America and westerners and burning our Flag.

I feel so warm inside knowing that we went to liberate these mutha phuckas.

 

[ferdville]

I would say that the fault lies as follows:

1. Bush
2. Cheney
3. Rumsfield
4. Haliburton
5. Tax cuts for the rich
6. Bad economy
7. Ultra conservative Supreme Court
8. Neocons
9. Voter disenfranchisement
10 Katrina

 

[RAYMOND]

i would blame mother nature

 

[smurphy]

I blame Joe Paterno. Retire already!

 

[Marco]

As MC has already stated in this thread, are we officially in the business of removing brutal dictators from power and rebuilding foreign countries?

How about being standup about it and rebuilding that area that just got saturated by Katrina, and nation-building some oil platforms back together in the Gulf of Mexico?

If the conservatives here feel so great about removing foreign dictators then sign up down at the local recruiting office and spend the rest of your own life hopping from country to country putting bandaids on all the bleeding and oppressed.

While Louisiana is underwater Iraq can just plain fvcking wait as far as it comes to rebuilding.

Time to be responsible and take care of our business first....group hugs and democracy doesn't fly in the middle east, plain and simple.

 

[ferdville]

Once again in this thread we have people saying that if you are in favor of the war in Iraq you should be expected to volunteer? Or that conservatives should hop from country to country to stop the bleeding simply because they are conservatives. Despite this being totally nonsequitar in principle, why wouldn't someone who is against the war in Iraq be obligated to rush over there and stand in front of a tank or something equally inane? And those that feel it is the admnistration's fault that people are suffering in NO, why should you not have to go down there and help them yourself?

Do you see what an illogical analogy that is?

 

[Marco]

There are people in this thread talking about genocide in foreign, sovereign countries that aren't under the jurisdiction of the United States, and somehow twisting it into an American job of putting an end to it.

NEWS FLASH: We're not responsible for the actions of every lunatic dictator on the planet.

The disaster in New Orleans is going to cost BILLIONS of dollars to clean up.....

We have hundreds of billions for foreign causes, at the same time this country is in possession of a national debt that is nearly 8 TRILLION DOLLARS...

I'm simply saying the US doesn't have the money to spend on all these foreign excursions, that's a proven fact given the budget problems, the national debt, social security issues, health care costs.....

I'm saying take care of the US citizens. We pay taxes to fix our own infrastructure, let the other countries on the planet run up thier own national debt, fight thier own wars, and bury thier own dead. There isn't enough money inside the US to put an end to every travesty committed in every foreign country on the planet.

There is no "illogical analogy" in taking care of our own business, "liberating 50 million people" in Iraq just so they can go through an upcoming civil war is an egregious waste of money considering that New Orleans has been turned into Atlantis.

It's called being RESPONSIBLE.

 

[BBMF]

Here, Here Marco!

Our own country and our own people should come first.

Put a small police force in Iraq.

Bring everyone else home to rebuild the Gulf Coast.

THIS IS AMERICA

 

[LUX]

There are people in this thread talking about genocide in foreign, sovereign countries that aren't under the jurisdiction of the United States, and somehow twisting it into an American job of putting an end to it.

NEWS FLASH: We're not responsible for the actions of every lunatic dictator on the planet.

The disaster in New Orleans is going to cost BILLIONS of dollars to clean up.....

We have hundreds of billions for foreign causes, at the same time this country is in possession of a national debt that is nearly 8 TRILLION DOLLARS...

I'm simply saying the US doesn't have the money to spend on all these foreign excursions, that's a proven fact given the budget problems, the national debt, social security issues, health care costs.....

I'm saying take care of the US citizens. We pay taxes to fix our own infrastructure, let the other countries on the planet run up thier own national debt, fight thier own wars, and bury thier own dead. There isn't enough money inside the US to put an end to every travesty committed in every foreign country on the planet.

There is no "illogical analogy" in taking care of our own business, "liberating 50 million people" in Iraq just so they can go through an upcoming civil war is an egregious waste of money considering that New Orleans has been turned into Atlantis.

It's called being RESPONSIBLE.

I agree with everything that you've mentioned. Nicely put. :clap:

 

[djv]

Seems strang this guy was so bad. Started back in 80's. Was so important we let him stay over 20 years. No need to thank W. He gave him a pass for 2 years. Reagan gave him one for 8 years. Old man Bush let him off hook for 4 years, and Clinton 8 years. In other words he must not have been worth it.

 

[CHARLESMANSON]

I would say that the fault lies as follows:

1. Bush
2. Cheney
3. Rumsfield
4. Haliburton
5. Tax cuts for the rich
6. Bad economy
7. Ultra conservative Supreme Court
8. Neocons
9. Voter disenfranchisement
10 Katrina

LOL don't forget Rove!!! I guess after murdering 400,000 innocent people, Saddam should be left off the list. I'm having trouble understanding the logic here in some of these posts. Someone even said we had no right to take out a genocidal tyrant who exterminated half a million people. I guess we had no right to go after Hitler either right?

I never hear any complaints about Saddam's murderous past or his pursuit to kill Americans. Why is that?

Remember when Saddam Hussein's military was firing anti-aircraft fire at U.S. Fighter Jets as they patrolled the no-fly zone? That itself was a declairation of war. Just one of many reasons Bush extracted that murderer. You guys just chose to live in fantasyland then you whine and complain day in and day out.

It's always just "attack Bush"...the man who liberated 50 Million people from terrorist governments. He did the right thing. Hell if you liberals had it your way, Saddams rape rooms would still be open. Oh well, slam Bush all you want. This is the democratic party of today. Out of touch with reality, angry and bitter. Right there to critisize anything our country does but never offer any alternative solutions. Madjacks is a perfect example.

 

[Penguinfan]

I'm having trouble understanding the logic here in some of these posts.

Which adds to the long list of things you can't figure out.


Seriously, I don't think anyone said Saddam needed left in power, we just ask that Bush didn't **** it up as bad as he did. If you don't think the war in Iraq is going badly then there is just nothing left to say to you. You balme the democratic contingent for being blind, what about you? Do you think all is well in Iraq?

 

[CHARLESMANSON]

I know people who are there in Iraq, one of them is a relative. They descibe Iraq in a totally different way than the liberal news media does. Gee, I wonder why that is?? I trust what they tell me, not you, not the media. My borther in law and friends would have no reason to lie to me. Iraq is not the debacle that the media makes it out to be. Just let me know if you'd like to read some emails I get from these guys. If you chose to be brainwashed by the Bush-hating media, then that's your choice. And you said I'm the one with my head up my ass? hmmmm

Saddam is in custody, no attacks on U.S. homeland in 4 years, 50 million people liberated. Women can now vote and show their face without getting the shit beat out of them. Rape rooms closed.

Yeah, real debacle.

What would have been your technique?

 

[Penguinfan]

Not sure what my "technique" would have been, but I would like to think it would involve:

1. Some sort of viable exit strategy

2. Less than three years to complete

3. 2000 less dead soldiers

4. A way to find Bin Laden, the larger and more dangerous of the two criminals

The Bush plan (if there ever was one) included none of the above.

Then again, I was never a Harvard cheerleader so what do I know.

Your man crush on GW wouldn't be so hard to take if you could admit the faults of the administration, it's bad enough that they can't.

 

[CHARLESMANSON]

Hey everybody has faults, I'm just not the type of person to play Monday morning QB and critisize my country day in and day out. It's so easy to sit at your computer and lay blame isn't it? Penguin...I like your ideas, they all sound good, but can you please be more specific?????

1. What would have been your exit strategy?

2. How do you turn a terrorist nation into a democracy in under 3 years?? (how long did it take for the U.S. to form it's democracy??)

3. How do you go to war, overthrow a dictator, establish a democracy and not lose 2,000 troops? (How many Americans died in the United States Civil war??? or other wars...the ratios are stageringly higher)

4. What technique would you use to capture Bin Laden, considering that we can't put troops in Pakistan?

Obviously, since you know what you are talking about and you have no problem critisizing the administration you can elaborate on those 4 points that you inserted. Thanks.