Big 12 Week 4
- Thread starter Sun Tzu
- Start date
Sun, how would you rate the Cyclones D v. Baylor's? Watched the Baylor game Saturday, and Army had much trouble moving the ball.
Sun, what do you think of Kansas St this week? That was an eye opener for me this morning when i broke out the lines.
Take care and GL!!!
Take care and GL!!!
i watched a little of the army/baylor game & noticed that army is not a good tackling team, which surprises me....because tackling is tecnique & discipline....
good luck on your army play.
good luck on your army play.
ISU plays tough defense--alot of blitzing--gambling could cost them but don't think against Army. Wondering if thier Offense will get better?--GL
I would be a little leary of playing on a team that just got worked over by Baylor at home. ISU defense is better than average and with a bye last week will be fresh. I dont see Army scoring AT BEST more than 10 in this game and Meyer and company will easily score 4-5 TD's in this game.
Good luck though.
Good luck though.
No problem Sun everyone makes mistakes. 
I have a pretty good fix on the Big XII so far this year. Had big wins on UCLA over OU, Missou and A&M last week. Am looking at Kstate this week; more of play against NTexas though as NTexas is just awful.
I have a pretty good fix on the Big XII so far this year. Had big wins on UCLA over OU, Missou and A&M last week. Am looking at Kstate this week; more of play against NTexas though as NTexas is just awful.
MadJack said:
:142lmao:
I never seen someone treat others so rudely and sarcastically. Posters try and pick his brain or ask why he likes a play and Sun Tzu repeatedly refuses to help anyone out. I wonder why he even posts in the first place. He obviously has no intention in helping others. Multiple times he has refused to explain why he likes one of his own plays (guess he takes it as an insult to question his plays) but I have seen Sun Tzu repeatedly go into other posters threads critiquing their analysis/opinion but in his own threads he offers ZERO analysis and treats others like $hit. I don't get it? He feels it is ok for him to go into other peoples threads and offer his opinion, but when others come into his threads, NO OPINIONS are allowed? :shrug: Repeatedly giving sarcastic rude replies?
Good luck and hope you have another winning week Sun Tzu! I guess you have your own way in doing things.
Last edited:
i actually play every one of his plays without any hesitation and appreciate the great picks but sometimes we all need to stop and take a hard look at how we treat others. i can only imagine how he interacts on a daily basis with other people. perhaps he needs to eat more happy meals at mcdonalds
Sun Tzu said:
I don't want ANYBODY to bet my plays blindly. If someone chooses to open my threads, they can decide for themselves if they want to bet with me. If someone asks me a question, I always reply without being rude or sarcastic. If a poster doesn't think I am a good handicapper or I offer poor analysis, THEY DO NOT HAVE TO OPEN MY THREAD! But that is the way I do things. I get enjoyment helping others out. If nobody thinks I benefit the site, then I won't post. You do things different. Nobody is questioning your handicapping skills. You just treat posters who come into your threads trying to pick your brain with rude sarcastic replies. I think that is wrong. You are here to help others out? Right? So if someone politely asks why you like a play, why do you have to be so rude? Do you want people to bet your plays blindly? Maybe they have a question. They are not insulting you by asking you a question or providing their opinion. I guess MJ feels the same as I do. Maybe you should have your threads locked for only yourself to post in since you don't want other peoples opinions. But the funny thing is you have repeatedly gone into other posters threads and expressed yours! :nono:
Last edited:
