FOX airing all tapes of Dems saying "Saddam had WMDs"

CHARLESMANSON

Hated
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2004
2,651
15
0
90
CORCORAN, CA
:clap: FAIR AND BALANCED :clap:

I can't believe they waited this long but I guess the democrats deserve it since they are the one's calling for a WMD investigation.

**Fox News now playing all the old videos of.....

Clinton - Kerry - Edwards - Albright - Hillary - Gore - Berger - Shumer - Kennedy
Levin - Pelosi - Rockeckefeller - Graham - Byrd -etc, eyc............ "LYING" about WMD's in Iraq.

All these liberals ranting and raving in front of congress about Saddam being a threat with WMDs and grave nuclear ambitions.

Sean Hannity just got done BBQing Charlie Rangel and last night Kecinich's hypocracy was exposed on live television. LOL you should have seen him panicking when Hannity played his old quotes!! :mj07: Kecinich started yelling and shuffling his papers all over the place while Hannity just sat there smiling. :)


VP Cheney said it best tonight...

"The President and I cannot prevent certain politicians from losing their memory, or their backbone ? but we?re not going to sit by and let them rewrite history."
Obviously neither is Fox News. :Yep:
 
Last edited:

dr. freeze

BIG12 KING
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2001
7,170
8
0
Mansion
Where is the rest of the media?

funny how they can find an obscure quote in which Alito says how bad a ruling Roe v Wade is (which very few with any bit of law background would dispute)

but the leftist media willl not roll back the tape on these political hacks who are spewing lies every day on the floor of the Senate!!!
 

JCDunkDogs

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 5, 2002
956
5
0
L.A. Area
You guys seem sort of agitated about this Senate Rule 21 stuff. I thought it was just...oh, what did Frist call it? "A stunt" by the Democrats. Why the lather, fellas?
 

CHARLESMANSON

Hated
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2004
2,651
15
0
90
CORCORAN, CA
Obviously you would try to deflect from the topic at hand but to answer you - We are agitated because all of those democrat senators are hypocrites!!!!!! :s4: How hard is that for your crybaby liberal mind to understand?? :mj07:

Again, for the morons oout there -- All of these democrats are throwing a fit calling Bush a liar WHEN THEY THEMSELVES SAID THE SAME THING!!!!!!!!!!!

What about Dec 16, 1998 when Bill Clinton said....
""The best way to end that threat once and for all is with a new Iraqi government -- a government ready to live in peace with its neighbors, a government that respects the rights of its people"


Live with it and shut up. They cannot un-say what they have already said. They are gutless and so are the rest of you crybaby liberals. Your party is a bunch of hypocrites. No wonder you tried to change the subject and talk about Frist!!

JC Junkdog :s4: "bring them home :cry: cut and run before the job is done"
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
They should and included the much longer list of others, like Reb's.
And then lets find out who was in charge of that false info. Then put us into war with those lies.
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
Even if we had found all this nerve gas that we supplied him with and encouraged him to use against Iran in the 80's, WHO GIVES A FVCK? Maybe we will still find something, WHO GIVES A FVCK? This was a personal vendetta that had been planned by Cheney, Wolfowitz, Feith, Rumsfeld since the early 90's. 9/11 gave them the perfect opportunity to sell this bullshit to this country. That's sick.

WMD or no WMD, the fact remains that Saddam was no threat to America. That's what gets lost in all this crap about WMD, lies, cherry-picking info, etc. HE WAS NO THREAT WHATSOEVER TO US REGARDLESS OF WHAT HE HAD. The fact that he had absolutely nothing only makes it worse, but it's not the main point.

This war was not the least bit necessary and all it's done was cost us the life of 2000 and counting young men and women and around 16000 that have come home maimed. For what?

Let's take the worst case. Saddam still had stockpiles of nerve gas from the 80's. Now let's look at what had transpired from 1991-2003. Well, nothing transpired. So somebody please tell me wtf was sooooo urgent in invading in 2003.

If we just HAD to attack somebody in addition to Afghanistan , at least make it against a state that sponsors terror, like Iran or Syria. WTF did Iraq have to do with anything that should have been at the top of our priority list? Namely, terrorism.

There is NO justification for this bullshit, WMD or no WMD.
 

Master Capper

Emperior
Forum Member
Jan 12, 2002
9,104
11
0
Dunedin, Florida
WMD or no WMD, the fact remains that Saddam was no threat to America. That's what gets lost in all this crap about WMD, lies, cherry-picking info, etc. HE WAS NO THREAT WHATSOEVER TO US REGARDLESS OF WHAT HE HAD. The fact that he had absolutely nothing only makes it worse, but it's not the main point.


Exactly! This is no different then Enron as the information that was supplied to us was cooked and skewed with parts and pieces being twisted, manipulated and torn apart to make it fit their agenda, but unfortunately this not only cost us money but it also cost us the lives of young men and women that were forced into this twisted tale of Cheney's.
 

spibble spab

NEOCON
Forum Member
Apr 16, 2004
657
0
0
47
Concord, Michigan
CHARLESMANSON said:
What about Dec 16, 1998 when Bill Clinton said....
""The best way to end that threat once and for all is with a new Iraqi government -- a government ready to live in peace with its neighbors, a government that respects the rights of its people"


Live with it and shut up. They cannot un-say what they have already said. They are gutless and so are the rest of you crybaby liberals. Your party is a bunch of hypocrites. No wonder you tried to change the subject and talk about Frist!!

JC Junkdog :s4: "bring them home :cry: cut and run before the job is done"



KOSAR: what do you say to that quote?

KOSAR: You dont give a shit if saddam had WMDs or not :mj07: :mj07:

You ve been sniffing too much defoliant back in the day :mj07:

Saddam would NEVER EVER give WMD to al qaeda right??? :mj07: :mj07:
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
spibble spab said:
KOSAR: what do you say to that quote?

KOSAR: You dont give a shit if saddam had WMDs or not :mj07: :mj07:

You ve been sniffing too much defoliant back in the day :mj07:

Saddam would NEVER EVER give WMD to al qaeda right??? :mj07: :mj07:

Bubbas quote? I guess he figured that Iraq would be less of a threat if Saddam was gone. Duh. How many other countries could we apply that to? Iran? Saudi Arabia? Syria? North Korea? China? How many others?

Saying something like that and doing something stupid and reckless are two different things.

That's correct. At that point in time, I really could care less if Saddam still had the chemical weapons that we supplied him with 15-20 years prior. There was no evidence of an active program. There was evidence that he would love to start up again, but couldn't because the world was WATCHING, not occupying. When, exactly, in the time between 1991 and 2003 did he become this immediate threat?

As far as would he give WMD to his bitter enemy, Al-Qaeda?

Well, DID HE? :rolleyes:
 

CHARLESMANSON

Hated
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2004
2,651
15
0
90
CORCORAN, CA
NO HE DID NOT GIVE ANYTHING TO AL-QUEDA BECAUSE WE WENT IN AND REMOVED HIM!!!


:clap: THANK YOU BUSH FOR REMOVING THE MAN WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OVER 400,000 MASS GRAVES - that's genocide
 
Last edited:

spibble spab

NEOCON
Forum Member
Apr 16, 2004
657
0
0
47
Concord, Michigan
the reason why saddam has not had the chance to give WMD to al qaeda is well. maybe. ....noo... HES IN PRISON< JACKASSSS!

You can thank GEORGE W BUSH> lick his boots, princess
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
CHARLESMANSON said:
NO HE DID NOT GIVE ANYTHING TO AL-QUEDA BECAUSE WE WENT IN AND REMOVED HIM!!!

lol- yes, of course. It's not like he had 15 years to do it.

So do I have this right? He had tons of WMD in 2003, the threat was that he'd give them to Al-Qaeda, they all magically disappeared, none have turned up anywhere in the world. But because we removed him, he didn't have a chance to give these mythical WMD to Al-Qaeda? Is that the story?

Maybe we can stick to gardenweasels fairy tale that a convoy of Russian trucks swooped in days before the invasion and spirited every last drop of these huge stockpiles back to the motherland.
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
spibble spab said:
the reason why saddam has not had the chance to give WMD to al qaeda is well. maybe. ....noo... HES IN PRISON< JACKASSSS!

Don't ya kind of have to have something to give it to somebody else?

And even if he actually did have them, do ya figure he'd wait until the invasion to unload them to Al-Qaeda? Or do ya think he might use them on our troops?

I see the right-wing thinktank of scabby scab and manson were let out of school early today.
 

spibble spab

NEOCON
Forum Member
Apr 16, 2004
657
0
0
47
Concord, Michigan
Kosar, did you ever take a handgun or some shit like that and take to school and show it to your friends? there's your answer. If you were syria or russia, would you show your hand to me? I'm sorry you dont get it. thats OK, your harmless. I'll cancel your vote out in '08. make sure to go.

OK. one last time since kosar politely raised his paw:Saddam Hussiens was removed from power. For the sake of the argument we'll just assume he had no WMD, k? If saddam hussein stated he would financially reward anyone who killed an american, that he would not give WMD to al qeada. Common interest here. You say cheney is dirty with Halliburton, right? And Bush lied right? Right??? that did it! im going liberal! That way i can drink your kool-aid and in about 45 minutes time i will picture saddam hussein in a donald duck outfit, sucking on a lollipop while the U.N. rifles through his palaces. You smoking the kind! how do your coworkers not smell it on your clothes??
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
The pure beauty and clarity of thought being presented here by Kosar is something that should carefully be studied and thought about.

You conservatives REALLY need to slow down, stop and think...was/is this really worth it, considering the above points of truth? All political comments made by elected representatives aside...what Kosar is saying here is what should have taken the forefront in the discussions to go to war...not the BS manufactured stuff that was fed to anyone who would listen.

THIS is the point. Thanks, Kosar. I have been thinking on these lines a lot lately, but did not put it into words. Well done.
 

spibble spab

NEOCON
Forum Member
Apr 16, 2004
657
0
0
47
Concord, Michigan
KOSAR AND CHADMAN ON THE WAR IN IRAQ

are we there yet? are we there yet? are we there yet?

heres a cookie, now go sit down while we protect america.
not for your sake. but their are alot of people in this great country that arent as ignorant. thats what heartens me and maintains my pride
 

spibble spab

NEOCON
Forum Member
Apr 16, 2004
657
0
0
47
Concord, Michigan
""The best way to end that threat once and for all is with a new Iraqi government -- a government ready to live in peace with its neighbors, a government that respects the rights of its people"
-BILL CLINTON
 

spibble spab

NEOCON
Forum Member
Apr 16, 2004
657
0
0
47
Concord, Michigan
KOSAR AND CHADMAN ON THE WAR IN IRAQ

are we there yet? are we there yet? are we there yet?

heres a cookie, now go sit down while we protect america.
not for your sake. but their are alot of people in this great country that arent as ignorant. thats what heartens me and maintains my pride

"You can't say you love your country and hate your government." - Bill Clinton, 1995
 

CHARLESMANSON

Hated
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2004
2,651
15
0
90
CORCORAN, CA
This is only the extreme left spibble spab...it doesn't even matter what they say...they are wacky left who live in complete denial......I think this is halarious!!!
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top