No need for everybody to keep reading my other thread over and over - 600+ hits is more than I deserve. But this play is related to my UCLA pick in that other thread.
Can you play TEAM tots? If so, think you might want to take a look at this one:
UCLA team total OVER 59 1/2 : Pretty much a case of "LSU's defense is pretty good, but not that good". For one thing, I like UCLA's chances in this game and if they're gonna win - I gotta beliieve they'll score 60+. Hell, their chances of scoring 60+ is good enough for me even if they lose. But, better than that - vs. the SIXTH best defensive team in the country they scored 50, with ONLY 2 three-pointers, which I always attribute to a bit of luck (except maybe for Reddick in midseason form), And in this UCLA/Wash St. case - we're talking BAD luck. And that was away to boot. LSU isn't even in the top 20 defensive rankings. If you excuse the Bruins last against Memphis, they haven't scored under 62 pts. in their prev. TWELVE games and averaged closer to 70 pts/gm. in those games. This one ain't no SMALL play, it's a MEDIUM at worst.
Can you play TEAM tots? If so, think you might want to take a look at this one:
UCLA team total OVER 59 1/2 : Pretty much a case of "LSU's defense is pretty good, but not that good". For one thing, I like UCLA's chances in this game and if they're gonna win - I gotta beliieve they'll score 60+. Hell, their chances of scoring 60+ is good enough for me even if they lose. But, better than that - vs. the SIXTH best defensive team in the country they scored 50, with ONLY 2 three-pointers, which I always attribute to a bit of luck (except maybe for Reddick in midseason form), And in this UCLA/Wash St. case - we're talking BAD luck. And that was away to boot. LSU isn't even in the top 20 defensive rankings. If you excuse the Bruins last against Memphis, they haven't scored under 62 pts. in their prev. TWELVE games and averaged closer to 70 pts/gm. in those games. This one ain't no SMALL play, it's a MEDIUM at worst.
