ALCS - Indians vs Red Sox

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
Feb 22, 2001
7,300
74
48
Toronto
PLAYOFF RECORD

9-6 +6.39
ML 5-1 +6.08
RL 1-3 -1.6
game totals 1-0 +0.5
team totals 1-0 +0.5
parlays 1-2 +0.91

system sides 9-4
system picks 2-1 (value indicator any+10, +7at60+, +5at65+)

system totals 3-3
total picks 0-0 (65%+)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
Feb 22, 2001
7,300
74
48
Toronto
series starts Friday Oct. 12th

series starts Friday Oct. 12th

Game #1

Sabathia @ Beckett

Red Sox 65% (N/A)

under 8.5? 64% (N/A)


Giving a fairly small edge to the Red Sox pitching and a slightly larger edge to their hitting.

Sabathia faced the Bosox once this season, at home on July 24th, and was the loser in a 1-0 game against Dice-K; Sabathia pitched 7 strong, allowing only 5 hits and no walks while striking out 7. In 7 career starts against the Bosox he's 2-4 with a 3.91 era. In 3 games at Fenway he's 1-1 with a 2.35 era. On the road this season he went 8-3 with a 3.32 era. Sabathia was a little bit stronger in August than he was in September, and his first start in the ALDS was a little shaky as he allowed 4 hits, 6 walks, and 2 homers in 5 innings of work against the Yankees. Indians have solid middle relief as they're displaying in these playoffs, while closer Borowski is average at best. I have their bullpen rated a 78.

Beckett faced the Indians twice this season, going 1-1 with a brilliant 1.80 era and 0.53 whip; the Indians hit .143 off him this year. At Cleveland on July 25th he lost a 1-0 decision to Carmona, while allowing only 4 hits over his 8 innings pitched. Earlier, on May 29th, he got the W in a 4-2 win at home over the Indians. In 4 career starts vs them he's only 1-3 with a 6.57 era; those numbers are raunchy as he was 0-2 against them last season, getting pummelled once at home and once at Jacob's. He had a 2.18 era on the road this season but at Fenway it was 4.17. He was outstanding for most of August and September, with the only rough starts coming against the Yankees and then the season closer at home to the Twins. Beckett's brilliant game #1 performance against the Angels extended his postseason scoreless innings streak to 18. Bosox have a fantastic pen (rated an 82) and a very good closer in Papelbon.

Indians OPS vs R .760
Red Sox OPS vs L .800

Indians OPS on the road .749
Red Sox OPS at home .844

Indians OPS last 7 days .685 in 5 games (won't include Monday's result)
Red Sox OPS last 7 days .917 in 5 games

Indians were 29-28 on the road to R
Red Sox were 12-8 at home to L

Both clubs were very impressive in their opening round victories. This should be a very entertaining opener to this series, what with Beckett really establishing himself as a phenomenal playoff pitcher. Sabathia is having quite a season, too, and I suppose that he can be forgiven for his fairly weak start against the Yankees. While I alluded to him being a little less sharp in September than August, it is worth noting that in his last 5 regular season starts his K/BB ratio was 33/6 or 5.5?doesn't get much better than that, so maybe we can expect a little more control than he showed facing the Pinstripers. I have Sabathia rated fairly high for this contest, but I have to give Beckett the nod on the mound. The offensive numbers posted above also suggest that the Bosox should get the edge at the plate, too. If we somehow get a total of 9 for this game then I'll be trying the under?that would be the first system total of these playoffs if we see that 9. Probably an 8.5 or even an 8, I'm expecting; I might try the under at an 8.5 but, then again, I might be better off waiting to see who the umpire will be for the game. Bottom line is that I'm expecting good things from Beckett, limiting the Indians to somewhere in the neighbourhood of 2-4 runs. The last time the Red Sox faced a lefty was September 21st at Tampa, where they got Kazmir out of the game by the 6th inning, adding a bunch against Tampa's weak bullpen to win 8-1; Beckett started that game. Red Sox haven't faced a lefty starter yet in these playoffs, but their offensive numbers AND their W/L record is a little better against lefties for the season. Interesting to note, however, that they were 12-6 at home to lefties to begin September, so they actually went 0-2 at home vs lefties during that final month. One was actually a loss to the Yankees with Pettitte starting, on September 14th, but they actually eliminated Pettitte before he had even gone 5 innings and just ended up losing the battle of the bullpens. The other loss was a 1-0 game with Schilling losing to Kazmir on the 10th. The 'Sox were actually 2-0 on the road to lefties in September, beating the Orioles Olson before taking the 8-1 decision over Kazmir and Tampa.

This line, when it opens, may be outta sight. I'm hoping that we see something similar to what we saw for the ALDS game #1 with Beckett facing Lackey; near -145ish will get me to bite on the Bosox. Up around -160 or -170 and I might take a pass on the game, or look for other options such as the Indians team total under (4?). The runline might be pushing one's luck, as C.C. is bound to make a game of this one; runlines continue to burn me in the playoffs as they did during the regular season, so I think I'd be foolish to try this one, especially as I'm expecting a reaonably low-scoring game. Red Sox are likely winners for this opener, but you probably didn't need me to tell you that.


Predicted score: Red Sox 4 Indians 2


Plays pending.

GL
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
Feb 22, 2001
7,300
74
48
Toronto
Don't give me that do goody-good bullshit

Don't give me that do goody-good bullshit

PLAYS

Red Sox -150 3/2


This is about as good a line as I was expecting for the 'Sox. It's actually just barely a system pick at this number. 'Picks are 2-1, hitting the 'Sox in game #1 with Beckett over Lackey and the Rockies in game #2, while missing the Yanks in game #4. Anybody who thinks that the Indians are a team of destiny probably hasn't been paying attention to the Red Sox this season. I think that they will be a very difficult opponent for anyone the rest of the way, Rockies or whoever. Bosox series price, at -165, looks very promising; however, considering I'm getting a cheaper price on the opener's moneyline, I'm expecting to do better sticking with the sides as opposed to tying my money up for a week to 10 days. I really think that the 'Sox look great for game #1; the 65% call is conservative, if anything, as I may be rating Sabathia a little too high for this one, and the edge that I'm giving the 'Sox at the plate should, perhaps, be larger. As for totals, I think that the game total might be worthwhile, under the 8.5, though at -115 I'm going to wait for some umpire news, and I also think that the Indians team total under 4 looks promising but I'm not thrilled by the -135 price tag.

PLAY BALL!

GL
 
Last edited:

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
Feb 22, 2001
7,300
74
48
Toronto
Go 'Sox! (game one, at least)

Go 'Sox! (game one, at least)

PLAYOFF RECORD

10-6 +8.00
ML 6-1 +7.69
RL 1-3 -1.6
game totals 1-0 +0.5
team totals 1-0 +0.5
parlays 1-2 +0.91

system sides 10-4
system picks 2-1 (value indicator any+10, +7at60+, +5at65+)

system totals 4-3
total picks 0-0 (65%+)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

ALCS game #1 will leave me up either 5 or 10 units for the playoffs, so I think that's a significant enough swing for me and I'll leave my bet as it is. Both clubs have their merits going into this game but I still believe that the Red Sox should take this one. There does appear to be some value, too, at a -150 line, or thereabouts.

I might still try a total for this game, but I'm going to wait until we have some umpire information, which might not be until an hour or maybe even a half an hour before gametime. I'll consider the Indians team total under 4, still at that -135, and also the game total under the 8.5; any type of under-ump and I'll give the under call a bonus which would make it a system under; I haven't had a true system total (65%+) yet in these playoffs which is too bad as my totals really smoked over the last 4 or 5 months (really since May) of the season. If I get umpire news and it looks promising for the under then I'll post a word in here. Somebody like a C.B. Bucknor (a major over-ump) and I'll try to post word that the unders look dreadful. Not that the umpire is the be-all and end-all for totals, but I don't like to push my luck with inappropriate umpires for any totals.

Wish I had more to add about the game #1 matchup, but I guess I've stated where I stand. I could be off on this one, as the 'Sox first-round victory may not be a good measuring stick as to where they're at; Angels looked ripe to fall to any playoff contender and I think that they would have even lost to the Cubs. Indians beat the hottest 2nd half team in the Yankees, including clinching it at Yankee Stadium, so they've performed quite well under pressure. And if there's only 6 runs scored, as my prediction calls, then I suppose that either squad could take it. Ramble On...now's the time, the time is now...Sing my song. (I've been this way ten years to the day).

I've done an early 'cap on game #2, which may certainly be adjusted based on whatever happens in game #1. For that Schilling-Carmona matchup I'm probably looking at a mid 50's call on the Red Sox. That number will likely be low 50's if the 'Sox perform poorly on Friday or maybe even in the high 50's if the reverse is true (reverse=either 'Sox perform great or Indians perform poorly). Probably an 8.5 total, again, and I'm looking at a low 60's call on the under that number; would be mid-to-high 60's if we get a 9 instead, as long as the umpire is kosher for an under. Regardless of what happens in game #1 my early lean for game #2 is the under.

How about those Leafs?
Early season NHL is a bit tough to figure out.
Carolina, and maybe Tampa Bay, look like early-season bargain teams.
Other strong teams are kinda being priced as strong teams (Senators,Wings,Sharks,Rangers) though they're having mixed results.
Guess I'm in the wrong forum for this.

Rock n' Roll Josh!!!


Mother earth is pregnant for the third time
For y'all have knocked her up.
I have tasted the maggots in the mind of the universe.
I was not offended.
For I knew I had to rise above it all
Or drown in my own shit.


(Funkadelic, Maggot Brain, 1971)
 
Last edited:

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
Feb 22, 2001
7,300
74
48
Toronto
Red Sox lead series 1-0

Red Sox lead series 1-0

Game #2

Carmona @ Schilling

Red Sox 57% (-132)even

under 9 70% (-125)+14 --ump Danley is even or perhaps a slight under-lean if anything (decent K% since the zone was (supposedly) enlarged a few years back)
under 8.5 62% (-105)+10


I'm giving the Indians a small pitching edge while the Red Sox get a larger edge at the plate.

Carmona faced the Bosox twice last season, both times for very short relief appearances at Fenway Park, and he took the loss each time despite only lasting for an inning combined between the two games. 2006 was a bust for Carmona, as his 1-10 record and 5.42 era will attest. In one meeting with the 'Sox this season, at home on July 25th, he outduelled Josh Beckett and picked up the W in a 1-0 game, allowing 4 hits and 2 walks while striking out 6. That game concluded a sensational run by Fausto where he won 5 straight decision, looking real good in the process. Carmona appears to be on another solid run as he picked up 5 straight W's to close out the regular season before tossing 9 brilliant innings against the Yankees in game #2 of their series. Overall, the Indians have won his past 8 starts. Carmona's era is better on the road (2.80 vs 3.32 at home) though his whip and BAA were slightly higher on the road. He went 9-4 in 16 road starts this season. Indians have great middle relief but watch out for closer Borowski in a close game; this guy is bound to blow one sooner or later if Wedge is crazy enough to use him; I believe that he actually led the Majors in saves this past season but that era, up around 5, is about double what you can expect from a half-decent closer.

Schilling faced the Indians once this season, at home on May 28th, and got the W in a 5-3 decision over Cliff Lee; Curt threw 7 solid innings, allowing 6 hits and 1 earned run while walking none and striking out 10. He's 2-2 with a 3.79 era in his career against the Indians. At home this season, Schilling was 4-3 with a 4.06 era. He was pretty solid from the middle part of August to the end of the regular season, though the Bosox lost 4 of his last 5 regular season starts, with Curt going 1-3 over that time. Schilling looked great in game #3 of the Angels series, shutting them down for 7 innings, but the Angels offense was really sputtering so I'm not sure how good a measuring stick that one was. Schilling has done outstanding work in his career during the playoffs and appeared quite loose in his post-game interviews last week; he should be able to duke it out with Fausto and likely keep the numbers down. Bosox pen is, arguably, the best left in these playoffs; Papelbon is a solid closer and has been next-to flawless this season.

Indians .760 OPS vs R
Red Sox .808 OPS vs R

Indians .749 OPS on the road
Red Sox .844 OPS at home

Indians .685 OPS the last 7 days in 5 games
Red Sox .917 OPS the last 7 days in 5 games
(these offensive stats exclude Friday's game)

Indians 29-28 on the road to R
Red Sox 39-22 at home to R

Despite somehow collecting a zero, I think that the Bosox survived Gagne in the 9th simply due to their monster lead; why he's on the post-season roster I'll never understand, and if the Rockies take the Series in 7 games over the 'Sox then a Gagne stumble would be an ideal way to finish. Enough about this has-been?I can't see Francona using him in a close game unless all of his other pitchers have been kidnapped by aliens.

Game #2 should be dynamite. Fausto had been better than C.C. to close out the regular season and also in the Yankees series. It took me a long time to really develop any trust for Carmona?I was a non-believer for at least half of the season?but I'd be really surprised to see the Red Sox top a 5-spot for this game. 3 or 4 seems more likely for the home squad, who won't necessarily be complacent due to their game 1 victory, but they'll be in a position where a loss would be less critical. Schilling I've been fond of since him and the Big Unit won the '01 Series. Always trying to put any biases aside (hint: fade my Jays plays next season), I think that Schilling will likely toss a good game as well. For his 6 or 7 innings I imagine the Indians managing 1-3 runs; at least I think that the chances of that?a solid start by Curt?has to be somewhere between 60-80%; I'll admit that leaves, perhaps, a 1 in 3 chance that Curt gets lit up by what should be a very anxious Indians order. With a poor start by Curt we can expect somewhere between 4 and 7 runs for the visitors; I'm counting on Curt in order to preserve my under. As for the Indians facing the 'Sox pen, and likely the better part of the 'Sox pen as they've got a few key pieces that could use some work in this series AND this should be a much closer game, I don't expect much success there. Umpire Kerwin Danley has a relatively generous strike zone so I'm further expecting the score to be at the lower end of the spectrum. I think that the likelihood of Carmona tossing a solid game is a little bit greater than Schilling looking sharp, but if Curt is on then the 'Sox will have a sizeable edge due to their bats and the home-field edge. This one is a much tougher call than that first one, and it looks like the opening line is appropriate, at least according to my numbers, so I see no value on the sides. The total is available at both a 9 (maybe not for long) and at an 8.5, which I expected. At the 9 I've got my first system total ("pick") of these playoffs and as soon as I saw the 9 I was hoppy. This will be my only play for game #2. I could care less who wins; would be nice to see the Indians make a series of it, and insure us of at least a 5th game in the series (more opportunity=greater opportunity). I still have to give the home side the edge.


Predicted score: Red Sox 4 Indians 3


Plays performed but posting's pending.

GL
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
Feb 22, 2001
7,300
74
48
Toronto
I'm alright, Jack. Keep your hands off my stack.

I'm alright, Jack. Keep your hands off my stack.

PLAYOFF RECORD

12-6 +12.00
ML 8-1 +11.69
RL 1-3 -1.6
game totals 1-0 +0.5
team totals 1-0 +0.5
parlays 1-2 +0.91

system sides 12-4
system picks 3-1 (value indicator any+10, +7at60+, +5at65+)

system totals 4-5
total picks 0-0 (65%+)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

PLAYS

clev@Bost un9 -125 1.75/1.4


That's it for this contest. Hopefully Carmona keeps his roll going. Schilling, too.
System totals ("picks"?65%+) had a great year for me, even saving my rather poor September by ending the season 51-27 (65.4%). This is the first of it's kind during these playoffs, which is a little surprising conisdering we should have a bunch of the best pitchers left standing, but we've also got some strong bats left, too, so things have kind of been balancing out for the totals. The under looks strong for this game.

GL
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
Feb 22, 2001
7,300
74
48
Toronto
series tied 1-1

series tied 1-1

Game #3

Matsuzaka @ Westbrook

Indians 57% (+112)+9

over 10 58% (-105)+6 --umpire Gorman is an under-ump


I'm giving the Indians a small edge pitching while I've got the hitting even for this contest. A reasonable home-field edge comprises the rest of the edge.

Dice-K faced the Indians twice this season, first getting pounded at home to them on May 30th, taking the loss in the 8-4 Indians win, then later pitching a great 7 shutout innings at Jacob's on July 24th, picking up the W in the 1-0 win over Sabathia. It's not surprising that Dice's better game came on the road as his era was almost a full point lower on the road and his other numbers were a bit better too; save for that win-loss record, where he went 8-4 at Fenway and only 7-8 on the road (getting much less run-support away from Fenway, of course). From the second half of August to the end of the regular season Matsuzaka was generally consistently bad. His first playoff start was, likewise, horrible, as he posted a 5.79 era and .333 BAA after surviving for less than 5 complete. It's hard to expect good things from him here due to the past couple of months. Red Sox have a solid bullpen but I don't think that the Indians will fear it much due to their breakout in the 11th on Saturday; Papelbon was the lone bright spot for the 'Sox pen in that one and he should be lights out again givin the chance.

Westbrook faced the Bosox once this season and was hit pretty hard at home on July 23rd, taking the loss in the 6-2 'Sox win. In 6 career starts against the Red Sox he's 3-2 with a 4.81 era, the 'Sox hitting a whopping .364 against him overall. At home this season Jake went 4-5 with a 3.94 era. He looked pretty sharp through August but had a rougher go throughout September. He was smoked by the Yankees in game #3 of that series and took the loss in the 8-4 game. While it is also quite difficult to expect great things from Jake for this contest, I do have the Indians pitching rated higher than the 'Sox for this one. Indians middle relief is solid though I still have little regard for closer Borowski.

Red Sox .808 OPS vs R regular season
Indians .760 OPS vs R same

Red Sox .768 OPS on the road same
Indians .795 OPS at home same

Red Sox hit .276 on the year vs R
Indians hit .268 on the year vs R
Red Sox hit .264 on the road vs R
Indians hit .279 at home vs R
Red Sox hit .288 last 10 vs R
Indians hit .290 last 10 vs R

Red Sox 32-21 on the road to R
Indians 35-19 at home ro R

I don't really understand this line. It appears that Dice-K is getting more respect than he deserves. That or, perhaps, the Indians are merely being discounted, but I believe that it's the former. Red Sox may need to use Lester again if Dice can't survive 5 innings again. Such a move might impel Francona to use Beckett on 3 days rest for game #4 while saving Wakefield for any possible long relief roles; there's always a chance that Wakefield gets used for this one if Dice gets diced. Westbrook hasn't been great over the past month so the over might be a solid play. Still, I think that I have a little more faith in Jake, currently, than I have in Matsuzaka, so I think that I'll be backing the hometowners for game #3. Very nice line, anyways; almost a system pick but just barely missing the cut. Umpire Gorman will likely keep me off of the over; the call would have been 65% on the over if it weren't for Gorman going?I gave it a sizeable penalty due him being scheduled.


Predicted score: Indians 6 Red Sox 5


Plays pending.

GL
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
Feb 22, 2001
7,300
74
48
Toronto
New car, caviar, four-star daydream...think I'll buy me a football team.

New car, caviar, four-star daydream...think I'll buy me a football team.

PLAYOFF RECORD

14-8 +10.96
ML 9-1 +12.3
RL 2-3 -0.9
game totals 1-2 -1.85
team totals 1-0 +0.5
parlays 1-2 +0.91

system sides 13-5
system picks 3-1 (value indicator any+10, +7at60+, +5at65+)

system totals 4-7
total picks 0-2 (65%+)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



PLAYS

Indians +114 2/2.28


I decided to wait a bit, what with all the other action going on for Sunday. I'm glad that I did as, with this line, it just makes the cut as a "system pick." (+112 has a 47.17% break-even mark, and I always round these up so that's 48%, while a +114 has a 46.73% break-even mark, rounded up to a 47 I get the 'cap (57%) minus the BE of 47% gives me a +10, hence a "system pick"). "Picks" are 3-1 so far in the playoffs, hitting Beckett over Lackey, Morales over (wasn't it Kendrick?...game #2?), and Beckett over Sabathia in their game #1; the miss was the Yankees in game #4 with Clemens (oops) against Byrd. The only one of those four that was an underdog was the Rockies in game #2, so I'll be hoping that dog "picks" can stay undefeated. Not much more that I can add about this game. Until about 6 or 7 weeks ago I had Dice-K rated as a top-notch starting pitcher, but it appears that either the scouting reports have really figured him out or, more likely, that the wear and tear of a full MLB schedule has really taken it's toll on the Diceman (apparently in Japan they predominantly work on 5 days rest instead of MLB's norm of 4). Dice had 6 days of rest prior to his playoff start against the Angels, but that didn't seem to help him much as he was pretty bad. For this one he'll be going on a full 9 days of rest, making it very difficult to predict if he will be effective or not. He's already chucked one solid game at Jacob's but it is a true hitter's park, and his era did close the season at 4.40 after being at 3.59 a mere 8 starts earlier, and he allowed 8 homers over his last 40 innings pitched. Sizemore was the only Indian that took him deep in his 2 encounters with them, though 5 Indians had extra-base hits off him, 4 of whom will certainly be in the lineup (Garko,Hafner,Sizemore, and, most likely (in the lineup) Trot Nixon). The Bosox may have the three best bats going in their lineup?Ortiz, Ramirez, and Lowell?but I think that the balance of the roster is not quite as potent as the secondary bats in the Indians order. As for Westbrook facing these big three, Manny was 2 for 3 against him this season with a double, Lowell went 1 for 3, and Big Papi was out when Jake faced them. Of note, Crisp was 3 for 4 off him with a double. For Jake's career, Manny is actually 8 for 16 against Jake (just the one double and no homers), Ortiz is 0 for 7 with 3 walks and 1 K, and Lowell is 3 for 11 (.273) off him with no extra-base hits. Others of note, Crisp is 6 for 8, Hinske might play as he's 5 for 12 (.417), Varitek is 3 for 6 off him with a double, and Youkilis is 5 for 8 (.625) off him with a double. The only Indian with a homer off him is actually John Olerud, and he's been out of the Bigs for the past 2 seasons. Didn't I say something earlier about not having much more to add about this game?...I guess that I'm still trying to get a handle on whether or not my 57% call on the game is reasonable. I have the bats exactly even for this one, which you can agree with or disagree with, and then adjust my 'cap up or down according to your own take on the sticks. For the pitching, I'm giving a small edge to the Indians as I think that Dice has been pretty consistent in his mediocrity lately and he is more of a fly ball pitcher which isn't a great thing to be in certain hitter's parks such as Jacob's?or even Fenway for that matter, and notice that his numbers at Fenway were pretty bad, even throughout his more productive portions of the season. Jake is more of a ground-ball pitcher so he can survive in pretty much any park, not that he's been too impressive lately; I just think that he can match up with Matsuzaka. For the 2007 season, Westbrook allowed a homer every 11.7 innings pitched while Matsuzaka allowed one every 8.2 innings pitched. And, as mentioned, Dice was lit up fairly consistently during the latter stages of the season; Jake allowed only 3 homers over his last 60 innings pitched, though he did serve one up in his playoff game against the Yankees (Damon). To wrap this up, finally, I've got the bats even, the pitching edge comprises 3% of the 'cap, another 3% is given for home-field advantage, while the additional 1% is given due to the Indians momentum from the game #2 victory. Again, you can play with these numbers as you see the game and try to come to your own conclusions about the probability. I'm fairly comfortable with the call and think that there's value to be had with the Indians as a doggie today.

Just Wakefield-Byrd for Tuesday. Sounds like an over to me. Ump should be Emmel if they keep the rotation. He's even, though 36-24 on the total over the past 2 seasons. One at a time?one at a time?great thing about this part of the playoffs?I don't have 15 games to 'cap each and every freakin' day. Don't know how I survived that.

See you tomorrow(today).

GL
 
Last edited:

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
Feb 22, 2001
7,300
74
48
Toronto
Indians lead series 2-1

Indians lead series 2-1

Game #4

Wakefield @ Byrd

red sox 51% (+105)+2

over 10 72% (+106)+23 --ump Emmel is even, though he was 36-24 on the total over the past two seasons


I'm giving the Bosox the smallest of edges at the plate. An ever so slightly larger edge to their pitching. Indians home-field keeps the call out of the mid-50's.

Wakefield did not face the Indians this season. For his career, he is 9-8 with a 4.50 era vs the Tribe. At Jacob's he is 5-4 with a 4.64 era. On the road this season he went 7-8 with a 4.26 era. His era and BAA were lower on the road but his W-L record was better at Fenway as, like Dice yesterday, he gets much greater run-support at home. Since a 22-inning scoreless streak at the end of August, Tim was not very good, at all, in his 5 starts to close out the season, including surrenduring 7 homers over those final 5 starts, spanning only 24.2 innings pitched. He hasn't worked yet in these playoffs. Bosox have a solid bullpen and a great closer in Papelbon.

Byrd threw one game against the Bosox this season, getting the win at Fenway by posting a solid 1.50 era for the game (1 earned in 6 IP), but the Bosox did get 9 hits off him, batting .346 in the contest. Maybe not such a big deal as Byrd pitches to contact and gives up a tremendous number of hits. For his career against Boston, he's 4-2 with a 4.12 era in 7 starts. At home this season he went 8-4 with a rather large 5.68 era. His final 5 starts of the regular season were god-awful, as he went 1-3 (team 2-3) while sporting a 6.83 era over that time. Yankees hit .348 off him in their game #4, but Byrd got the W by keeping the Yankees to only a pair of runs over his 5 innings of work. Indians have a solid bullpen, as well, though closer Borowski is a weak spot.

Red Sox .808 OPS vs R regular season
Indians .760 OPS vs R regular season

Red Sox .768 OPS on the road RS
Indians .795 OPS at home RS

Red Sox hit .276 vs R
Indians hit .268 vs R
Red Sox hit .264 vs R on the road
Indians hit .279 vs R at home
Red Sox hit .288 vs R last 10
Indians hit .290 vs R last 10
(these offensive stats exclude Monday's game)

Red Sox 32-21 on the road to R RS
Indians 35-19 at home to R RS

Your call is as good as mine for this contest, as far as the side goes; I have no clue as to who has the edge in this one, though with the Indians current streak I suppose that they have some momentum, especially being at home. Wakefield's last 5 starts were extreme garbage, save for maybe his closer at home to the Twinkies; he has been serving up home runs as if he'd lost some kind of bet, and the Indians are likely to get a big fly or two off him in this contest; an early appearance by lefty Lester would not surprise me, and he's done good work vs the Indians in limited work; still, Indians hit lefties quite a bit better than they hit righties so an early appearance by Lester?which likely means a bunch of Indians runs anyways?would not bode well for the visitors. Byrd has been fade material for most of the season and I totally expected the Yankees to tear a strip off of him in their game #4; that didn't happen and I suppose that I should be giving Byrd some credit for being a fairly smart pitcher, as he has to be with the pretty bad stuff that he has; I'm not expecting great things from him here and the edge that I'm giving the Bosox piching is a reflection of that.

I think that we can safely expect 5 or more runs from BOTH sides, making the over about all that I would consider for this game (maybe the team totals, too). Ump Emmel is basically even, but he was 36-24 on the total over the past 2 seasons which doesn't figure too badly for attacking the over. This series has 7 games written all over it. With that being said, I think that the Red Sox will likely achieve the greater total.


Predcited score: Red Sox 7 Indians 6


Plays pending.

GL
 
Last edited:

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
Feb 22, 2001
7,300
74
48
Toronto
thanks, AnkAnk,

I appreciate it.

Over for me, though, as the side for this game is beyond my grasp.
I'll wait patiently for Wednesday in order to grab a piece of the Bosox.
Beckett appears to be the best pitcher going in these playoffs.
I suppose that a Boston win today would bode well for a Boston play on Wednesday; I think that the club would be much looser with the series tied 2-2 as opposed to being down 3-1.
My only interest in the side for today is just how it might affect that game #5 as, with Peavy nowhere to be found, Beckett has become my darling of these playoffs.

Even on a quick acknowledgment of a compliment I can't seem to keep things short and sweet.
The K.I.S.S. rule can kiss my ...

Thanks again
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
Feb 22, 2001
7,300
74
48
Toronto
I'm in the high fidelity first-class travelling set and I think I need a Lear jet.

I'm in the high fidelity first-class travelling set and I think I need a Lear jet.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLAYOFF RECORD

15-8 +13.24
ML 10-1 +14.58
RL 2-3 -0.9
game totals 1-2 -1.85
team totals 1-0 +0.5
parlays 1-2 +0.91

system sides 15-5
system picks 4-1 (value indicator any+10, +7at60+, +5at65+)

system totals 5-8
total picks 0-2 (65%+)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PLAYS

bost@Clev ov10 +106 2/2.12


I actually could have gotten +108 if I had waited, but this one is moving in the opposite direction that I expected. Obviously they're getting some under money moving the line, which is totally beyond my comprehension. I think that both team totals, over the 5, look good as well, and I almost tried Boston over at +105, but I think that I'll just stick with the game total as I think that looks best. This is the third total pick of the playoffs for my system but I missed the first two; the Schilling-Carmona under call was under at 70% while I had a 68% call on the over for Fogg-Hernandez. At a 72, this one is the highest, so far. Regular season total calls at 70% or more did fabulous but I'll leave this play at 2 units as my playoff totals are suffering some. Moneylines, as during the regular season, is where my bread is being buttered. I haven't 'capped game #5 yet, but I certainly expect a call on the Bosox as Beckett looks incredibly strong currently. We got a -145 for Beckett-Sabathia in Boston so I'm expecting a very appealing line of, maybe, -120 for the rematch. Better than that and I'll be looking at a 3-4 unit play. Worse than that would surprise me. An off-day Wednesday so that will be a good day to try and find some decent NCAA plays; think I might start on those tomorrow.

Jack is totally on top of things. I sent him an e-mail with my desired avatar, at about 2:30 am eastern; went out for a walk and when I got back, less than 2 hours later, my avatar was already in place. Thanks, Jack. Keep up the good work!

Man, this past week has been dynamite for me.
I am totally pumped up right now.
It's periods like this that make the extra effort worthwhile.

GL
 

gsp

Registered User
Forum Member
May 26, 2000
10,437
18
0
If the crew uses the same zone as last night your over might be in trouble, if they use the one they had at Bos you might be over before 5. Great job so far and good luck tonight.
 

robertw477

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 12, 2004
784
0
16
Great analysis. This game could be a toss up. Cleveland decided not to roll over like AZ.They can definitely play at home and wakefield can run hot and cold.

I love the over here tonight. Looks like a BEST bet for me!


GL to All

Rob

For AZ no tomm. They looked like a pile of crap. Rockies are so hot they could be the upset winner in the World Series
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
Feb 22, 2001
7,300
74
48
Toronto
:com: Geez...there's nothing worse than being totally WRONG on a call.:com:

(save for maybe running out of smoke, which is the position I'm in)

Emmel is calling eVeRyThInG for strikes, too, which is uncharacteristic of him and certainly doesn't help my cause.

I'd like to bail, but to buy the under I have to pay -150.

Guess I'll just have to accept this one.
Sorry for such a shitty call.
 

Destructor D

Destructor
Forum Member
Dec 6, 2005
8,624
125
63
Kansas City, MO
You have a push... Nice call! At least you won't lose and you still have 21 outs lefts which means the Over looks very good.

I'm just hoping the Tribe settle down and win this game.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top