Locals say no one talked to them
Mark Salter, Mr. McCain?s closest adviser, said in an e-mail message that Ms. Palin had been interviewed by Arthur B. Culvahouse Jr., a veteran Washington lawyer in charge of the vice-presidential vetting process for Mr. McCain, as well as by other lawyers who worked for Mr. Culvahouse. Mr. Salter did not respond to an e-mail message asking if Ms. Palin had told Mr. Culvahouse and his lawyers that her daughter was pregnant.
In Alaska, several state leaders and local officials said they knew of no efforts by the McCain campaign to find out more information about Ms. Palin before the announcement of her selection, Although campaigns are typically discreet when they make inquiries into potential running mates, officials in Alaska said Monday they thought it was peculiar that no one in the state had the slightest hint that Ms. Palin might be under consideration.
?They didn?t speak to anyone in the Legislature, they didn?t speak to anyone in the business community,? said Lyda Green, the State Senate president, who lives in Wasilla, where Ms. Palin served as mayor.
Representative Gail Phillips, a Republican and former speaker of the State House, said the widespread surprise in Alaska when Ms. Palin was named to the ticket made her wonder how intensively the McCain campaign had vetted her.
?I started calling around and asking, and I have not been able to find one person that was called,? Ms. Phillips said. ?I called 30 to 40 people, political leaders, business leaders, community leaders. Not one of them had heard. Alaska is a very small community, we know people all over, but I haven?t found anybody who was asked anything.?
Trying to keep a secret
The current mayor of Wasilla, Dianne M. Keller, said she had not heard of any efforts to look into Ms. Palin?s background. And Randy Ruedrich, the state Republican Party chairman, said he knew nothing of any vetting that had been conducted.
State Senator Hollis French, a Democrat who is directing the ethics investigation, said that no one asked him about the allegations. ?I heard not a word, not a single contact,? he said.
Mr. French, a former prosecutor, said that he was knowledgeable about background checks and that, he, too, was surprised that the campaign had not reached out to state legislative leaders.
More from NYTimes.com
Click links below:
Party?s plans are unsettled; McCain visits Gulf
TV cameras turn from G.O.P. to storm
G.O.P. rallies in support of McCain, poll shows
McCain's pick may foster bigger role for Clinton
External links
A number of Republicans said the McCain campaign had to some degree tied its hands in its effort to keep the selection process so secret.
?If you really want it to be a surprise, the circle of people that you?re going to allow to know about it is going to be small, and that?s just the nature of it,? said Dan Bartlett, a former counselor to President Bush and an adviser in both of his presidential campaigns.
Former McCain strategists disagreed on whether it would have been useful for Ms. Palin?s name to have been more publicly floated before her selection so that issues like the trooper investigation and her daughter?s pregnancy might have already been aired and not seemed so new at the time of her announcement.
Catch-22
?Had the story been written about the state trooper three months ago, nobody would care about it anymore,? said Dan Schnur, a former McCain aide who now directs the Jesse M. Unruh Institute of Politics at the University of Southern California. ?It?s a risk. No matter how great the candidate, it?s a significant risk to put someone on the ticket? who hasn?t been publicly scrutinized.
?They obviously felt it was worth the risk to rev up the base and potentially reach out to Clinton supporters,? Mr. Schnur said.
But Howard Opinsky, another McCain veteran, said calling attention to Ms. Palin?s possible candidacy during the search process would have undermined the impact of her eventual selection.
?Had her name been played out in the press for months and months, she wouldn?t have been seen as so bold,? Mr. Opinsky said. ?You either get freshness and you have to live with what you get in your vetting or you lose the freshness.?
...........................................................
Holy Shit Balls Batman :scared