stock market on Obama's watch

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,494
171
63
Bowling Green Ky
Obama's watch? 22 hours after elected? 10 weeks before it's his 'watch.'

I know you post this ridiculous shit for fun, but others actually believe it.

Granted its got nothing to with obama's watch--but as I told Smurph in other thread it is extremely relevant to fact- it's the financial worlds statement following knowing which party/pres will be dictating economic policy next 4 years.

Hate to be redundant with same post as other thread--but wanted to make sure you got chance to respond Matt. ;)

Market history of day following results of who's in power next 4 years--


Year Dow S&P Nasdaq President elect
2008 -5.05 -5.27 -5.53 Barack Obama
2004 +1.01 +1.12 +0.98 George W. Bush
2000 -0.41 -1.58 -5.39 No decision: G.W. Bush v Al Gore*
1996 +1.59 +1.46 +1.34 William Clinton
1992 -0.91 -0.67 +0.16 William Clinton
1988 -0.43 -0.66 -0.29 George H. W. Bush
1984 -0.88 -0.73 -0.32 Ronald Reagan
1980 +1.70 +1.77 +1.49 Ronald Reagan
1976 -0.99 -1.14 -1.12 James Carter
1972 -0.11 -0.55 -0.39 Richard Nixon
1968 +0.34 +0.16 --- Richard Nixon
1964 -0.19 -0.05 --- Lyndon Johnson
1960 +0.77 +0.44 --- John Kennedy
1956 -0.85 -1.03 --- Dwight Eisenhower
1952 +0.40 +0.28 --- Dwight Eisenhower
1948 -3.85 -4.15 --- Harry Truman
1944 -0.27 0.00 --- Franklin Roosevelt
1940 -2.39 -3.14 --- Franklin Roosevelt
1936 +2.26 +1.40 --- Franklin Roosevelt
1932 -4.51 -2.67 --- Franklin Roosevelt
1928 +1.20 +1.77 --- Herbert Hoover
1924 +1.17 --- --- Calvin Coolidge
1920 -0.57 --- --- Warren Harding
1916 -0.35 --- --- Woodrow Wilson
1912 +1.83 --- --- Woodrow Wilson
1908 +2.38 --- --- William Taft
1904 +1.30 --- --- Theodore Roosevelt
1900 +3.33 --- --- William McKinley
1896 +4.54 --- --- William McKinley
* George W. Bush ultimately was determined the winner of the 2000
election.
Source: Reuters EcoWin
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
Looks like Obama winning did not help the stock market, 5% down today, I believe I predicted this a few weeks ago. We are headed for some really tough times in the next 4 years. I expect everyone who has a brain to take their money out right before the Bush tax cuts go away. The market will be at about 4000 in two years, enjoy. Socialism does not work, spreading the wealth will spin us into a depression.
...........................................................

you dont have to be hysterical and desparate anymore

:142smilie

let it go

everything will be ok
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
Looks like Obama winning did not help the stock market, 5% down today, I believe I predicted this a few weeks ago. We are headed for some really tough times in the next 4 years. I expect everyone who has a brain to take their money out right before the Bush tax cuts go away. The market will be at about 4000 in two years, enjoy. Socialism does not work, spreading the wealth will spin us into a depression.

Why yes, look how good the market is doing WITH the bush tax breaks!:142smilie :142smilie funnisest post I have seen here in a long whiile!
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
Granted its got nothing to with obama's watch--but as I told Smurph in other thread it is extremely relevant to fact- it's the financial worlds statement following knowing which party/pres will be dictating economic policy next 4 years.

Hate to be redundant with same post as other thread--but wanted to make sure you got chance to respond Matt. ;)

Market history of day following results of who's in power next 4 years--


Year Dow S&P Nasdaq President elect
2008 -5.05 -5.27 -5.53 Barack Obama
2004 +1.01 +1.12 +0.98 George W. Bush
2000 -0.41 -1.58 -5.39 No decision: G.W. Bush v Al Gore*
1996 +1.59 +1.46 +1.34 William Clinton
1992 -0.91 -0.67 +0.16 William Clinton
1988 -0.43 -0.66 -0.29 George H. W. Bush
1984 -0.88 -0.73 -0.32 Ronald Reagan
1980 +1.70 +1.77 +1.49 Ronald Reagan
1976 -0.99 -1.14 -1.12 James Carter
1972 -0.11 -0.55 -0.39 Richard Nixon
1968 +0.34 +0.16 --- Richard Nixon
1964 -0.19 -0.05 --- Lyndon Johnson
1960 +0.77 +0.44 --- John Kennedy
1956 -0.85 -1.03 --- Dwight Eisenhower
1952 +0.40 +0.28 --- Dwight Eisenhower
1948 -3.85 -4.15 --- Harry Truman
1944 -0.27 0.00 --- Franklin Roosevelt
1940 -2.39 -3.14 --- Franklin Roosevelt
1936 +2.26 +1.40 --- Franklin Roosevelt
1932 -4.51 -2.67 --- Franklin Roosevelt
1928 +1.20 +1.77 --- Herbert Hoover
1924 +1.17 --- --- Calvin Coolidge
1920 -0.57 --- --- Warren Harding
1916 -0.35 --- --- Woodrow Wilson
1912 +1.83 --- --- Woodrow Wilson
1908 +2.38 --- --- William Taft
1904 +1.30 --- --- Theodore Roosevelt
1900 +3.33 --- --- William McKinley
1896 +4.54 --- --- William McKinley
* George W. Bush ultimately was determined the winner of the 2000
election.
Source: Reuters EcoWin


So what was the worlds 'statement' over the last few months as the market has crashed? Was that Obama also?

What if the market goes up 400 points today? Is that Obama? I mean, seriously.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
LMAO. As if Obama had anything to do with a random day in a choppy market. So the 4 straight up days just before the election (when everyone in the US except you knew Obama was about to win) were a copincidence - but today - today was an indication of Obama. Funny to be in your world.:00hour

the worst post-election nose dive....in history...
 

Happy Hippo

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2006
4,794
120
0
Market history of day following results of who's in power next 4 years--


Year Dow S&P Nasdaq President elect
2008 -5.05 -5.27 -5.53 Barack Obama
2004 +1.01 +1.12 +0.98 George W. Bush
2000 -0.41 -1.58 -5.39 No decision: G.W. Bush v Al Gore*
1996 +1.59 +1.46 +1.34 William Clinton
1992 -0.91 -0.67 +0.16 William Clinton
1988 -0.43 -0.66 -0.29 George H. W. Bush
1984 -0.88 -0.73 -0.32 Ronald Reagan
1980 +1.70 +1.77 +1.49 Ronald Reagan
1976 -0.99 -1.14 -1.12 James Carter
1972 -0.11 -0.55 -0.39 Richard Nixon
1968 +0.34 +0.16 --- Richard Nixon
1964 -0.19 -0.05 --- Lyndon Johnson
1960 +0.77 +0.44 --- John Kennedy
1956 -0.85 -1.03 --- Dwight Eisenhower
1952 +0.40 +0.28 --- Dwight Eisenhower
1948 -3.85 -4.15 --- Harry Truman
1944 -0.27 0.00 --- Franklin Roosevelt
1940 -2.39 -3.14 --- Franklin Roosevelt
1936 +2.26 +1.40 --- Franklin Roosevelt
1932 -4.51 -2.67 --- Franklin Roosevelt
1928 +1.20 +1.77 --- Herbert Hoover
1924 +1.17 --- --- Calvin Coolidge
1920 -0.57 --- --- Warren Harding
1916 -0.35 --- --- Woodrow Wilson
1912 +1.83 --- --- Woodrow Wilson
1908 +2.38 --- --- William Taft
1904 +1.30 --- --- Theodore Roosevelt
1900 +3.33 --- --- William McKinley
1896 +4.54 --- --- William McKinley
* George W. Bush ultimately was determined the winner of the 2000
election.
Source: Reuters EcoWin

This is the most irrelevant semi-interesting information I have ever seen. So since FDR's first term in office also coincided with the last biggest loss in the market, I guess he was a horrible president. Funny how he was the only horrible president in history to be elected to four terms. I guess the American people thought differently.
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
the worst post-election nose dive....in history...

So what was that 900 point drop a couple weeks ago? The largest drop 2 weeks away from an election?

You guys need to be patient. I'm sure there will be plenty of legitimate things to criticize Barry for once he actually is the president, but this shit is just silly.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
So what was that 900 point drop a couple weeks ago? The largest drop 2 weeks away from an election?

You guys need to be patient. I'm sure there will be plenty of legitimate things to criticize Barry for once he actually is the president, but this shit is just silly.

usually the market respnds favorably to the stability of the final selection of president...the market likes stability...

apparently,thats not the case this time.....
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
105,349
1,680
113
70
home
usually the market respnds favorably to the stability of the final selection of president...the market likes stability...

apparently,thats not the case this time.....

you're right. the market crashing has nothing to do with the shitty housing market, people losing half their retirement accounts, the auto industry about to go down the tubes, retailers showing record losses, quartetly earnings down for 80% of the corps reporting, etc, etc, etc.

it's ALL Obama's fault. you're right :rolleyes:

WTF are you thinking, kosar????
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
105,349
1,680
113
70
home
:shrug:

:142smilie
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
105,349
1,680
113
70
home
can't be coal because Obama is gonna bankrupt that industry :mj07:
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
you're right. the market crashing has nothing to do with the shitty housing market, people losing half their retirement accounts, the auto industry about to go down the tubes, retailers showing record losses, quartetly earnings down for 80% of the corps reporting, etc, etc, etc.

it's ALL Obama's fault. you're right :rolleyes:

WTF are you thinking, kosar????

I don't know what i'm thinking other than that some of these guys operate in another dimension.
 

kneifl

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 12, 2001
9,138
95
48
51
Virginia
www.tradewithjon.com
The Economy controls itself regardless of who is president. We saw it have a sharp decline under Cinton with the dot.com bubble. Now we have the housing bubble, which shouldn't be called the housing bubble at all because banks and lenders are who is to blame. The whole Economy is in recession now, not "just" the housing bubble. Now the whole economy is in the shitter because banks were loaning out money to anyone, funny how my next door neighbors who work at Subway and the local liquor store and have two boys in College qualified for a 315K condo with no problems at all:142smilie :142smilie No money down I might add. Research shows which administrations (presidents) relaxed these lending policies, but I won't get into that. People who are educated should know this fairly well. Regardless, the market has it's ups and downs and will continue to do so. Hopefully, it will recover soon. The economy will always have it's peaks and valleys regardless of who's president (The Dow hit 14,000 under Bush in 2007), and then retreated. It's bound to show annual returns of around 17-20% for the next few years (maybe not 2009, but I would guess 2010-2012). I know what I'm talking about after trading stocks in the markets before and getting a BA in Economics and MBA in Marketing.

kneifl
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top