right meets left again

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,859
665
113
50
TX
thats just great:sadwave: future

this is going to kill this nation
 

bryanz

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2001
9,724
35
48
64
Syracuse ny, usa
nothing kills this nation

nothing kills this nation

thats just great:sadwave: future

this is going to kill this nation
WE LIVED THREW bush'cheney....
THE LAST 8 YRS DIDN'T KILL THE FUTURE ?? we are in for tough times but Amerincans and tough people in America will be fine ... all this is , business as usual for people that go to work every day. We always find a way and we will again ! I'm ready... bring it on... Lets have a pitty party for the trust fund babies/siler spoons and the entitlement foks on the left & right and do what we do every day... Lets go get ours ! fuck them....
 

bryanz

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2001
9,724
35
48
64
Syracuse ny, usa
kill this nation ??? ARE you talking about RETREAT ? right wingers don't retreat in iraq but they cut & run everytime here at home... how do you explain that ?? I believe in what we can do as a country around the world and what we can at home... that is the difference between a patriot and a loyalist... big picture ..... think about it !!!
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
105,287
1,658
113
70
home
2 good posts, bryanz.
 

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,859
665
113
50
TX
hurt.pork2000.jpeg


thanks Obama, we really needed this pork filled bill:sadwave: future
 
Last edited:

dawgball

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 12, 2000
10,652
39
48
50
Much of the new spending would be for victims of the recession, in the form of unemployment compensation, health care and food stamps.

This quote is from the article. Could we guarantee that this new, additional money is going ONLY to those who are "victims" :)142smilie ) of the recession by not including lifers on welfare and food stamps?

This may sound cold-harded, but if we are going to stimulate the economy we need to be directly helping those people who want to work but have lost their jobs.

A plan to help the unemployed purchase health insurance would be reduced to a 50 percent subsidy instead of two-thirds.

This is a logical cut because this is what many employers are doing. Once again, if this bill has any hope of "stimulating" the economy, we have to make it more appealing to get back to work than to not work.

Much of the money would go for victims of the recession in the form of food stamps, unemployment compensation and health care.

Second time in this article that "victims" was used. I fecking hate this word in this context. It's like we expect to coast through life without road bumps and hurdles. Victims? Feck that!

It's hoped that the combined effort would work its way into the economy and save or create 3 million jobs or so to begin to ease the nation out of the recession by the end of this year.

I have a question from the last quote above and a quote from another article: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aUQhUE4hmNh4&refer=us

The total number of people collecting benefits jumped to a record 4.788 million a week earlier, today?s report showed.

Are these 3 million jobs government jobs? If so, does anyone else get an uneasy feeling from the angle that we are getting too many people employed by our government? This trend will continue to weigh down our (taxpayers) burden to keep the house of cards going.

If not, then disregard that last statement/question. :)
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top