Matt in simplist terms--
I was for bank bailouts under both admins because if banks fail it effects every swinging dick in the U.S. plus world wide. EVERYONE from everty walk of life.
I was not for auto bail under either admin because it effects small sector of population-
--and doesn't make any diff how much you give them--the unions have put them past point of no return.
--and before you rebut with the union hype of trickle down effect if they go under--
let me ask you a common sense question.
Will the # of auto's in US go down if they go under. If #'s of auto's don't decrease how can # parts needed go down?
Only thing that will change is the auto makers that acted finacially responsible and didn't have weightof unions to pack around will gain the sales that those that didn't go under lose.
Make sense?
Now had only some banks been in jeopardy of defualt and not entire system--I'd been doing cartwheels watching them having to pay for it by going under and the ones that didn't get stronger-
--but that was not the case.
I was for bank bailouts under both admins because if banks fail it effects every swinging dick in the U.S. plus world wide. EVERYONE from everty walk of life.
I was not for auto bail under either admin because it effects small sector of population-
--and doesn't make any diff how much you give them--the unions have put them past point of no return.
--and before you rebut with the union hype of trickle down effect if they go under--
let me ask you a common sense question.
Will the # of auto's in US go down if they go under. If #'s of auto's don't decrease how can # parts needed go down?
Only thing that will change is the auto makers that acted finacially responsible and didn't have weightof unions to pack around will gain the sales that those that didn't go under lose.
Make sense?
Now had only some banks been in jeopardy of defualt and not entire system--I'd been doing cartwheels watching them having to pay for it by going under and the ones that didn't get stronger-
--but that was not the case.