PLEASE READ!!!
- Thread starter CartersCubs
- Start date
You both have points. May need to get Eddie to weigh the case.
Keep it clean fellas! :mj06:
- Jan 21, 2008
- 494
- 7
- 18
That's right. He said that the Saints would put up 42 against Washington. I said no way they do that. The only reason I referenced the total of the game was to show just how stupid his 42 number was. I looked at it as if he was right in saying the Saints would score 42, then if Wash scored just 1 touchdown then the total would be near 50. I can't remember the last time I saw a total near 50 in a Redskin game. For the last time, the bet was that the Saints were not going to score 42 against the Skins, that's it. Why as a Skins fan would I give a shit about the game total? I took offense to him putting up that large number he thought would be scored against my team and I asked him to put his money where his mouth was. Once he looked at it closer, like after the big Monday nte game, he knew the Saints were ripe for the big hangover and then started talking some shit about the game total.
I thought it was the Saints and 42, but these bets should be made out and clear.. I make many bets on here and they are so cut and dry without any argument as to what they are..
Now I can't believe they missed that fucking FG.. Nobody outside of Washingon wants the Skins win more than Minnesota.:00hour
Now I can't believe they missed that fucking FG.. Nobody outside of Washingon wants the Skins win more than Minnesota.:00hour
Redskin,
You seemed to manage to post up within minutes of this guy's posts every single time, EXCEPT after he makes the offer of the bet.
Once he asks if the wager is ok.....you are a no-show for a week? Kinda looks like you started the pussy parade....not him.
Then, you get to pick and choose how to call foul? Real nice.
It looks to me like you never accepted his bet in a timely fashion, so if he wishes to not accept the terms when you finally DO show your face, (when it looks good to you)......that's his choice!
It's not a back out of a wager by any stretch!
You seemed to manage to post up within minutes of this guy's posts every single time, EXCEPT after he makes the offer of the bet.
Once he asks if the wager is ok.....you are a no-show for a week? Kinda looks like you started the pussy parade....not him.
Then, you get to pick and choose how to call foul? Real nice.
It looks to me like you never accepted his bet in a timely fashion, so if he wishes to not accept the terms when you finally DO show your face, (when it looks good to you)......that's his choice!
It's not a back out of a wager by any stretch!
- Jan 21, 2008
- 494
- 7
- 18
If you followed along from the start, you would see that there never was a doubt what the bet was. He changed things around today because he knew he was crazy for thinking the Saints would score 42 pts. I did answer his question about the bet on a different thread, if you look it up you'll see that. Why the hell would I run from a bet that I wanted to make for the last 7 weeks? The bet was just as crazy as his shit about how the Saints would be the all time scoring leaders and beat the prev record. Just like the bet today, that will not happen.
- Dec 8, 2005
- 2,963
- 0
- 0
Now that I think about it.....You didn't say Minnesota would win the division. I thought I agreed to Minnesota losing 1 or more games. I would like to back-out now. :mj07:
