Tea party victory endangers GOP?s goal of retaking the Senate

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
105,279
1,653
113
70
home
:0corn


codonnell.jpg




With polls showing significant GOP momentum this fall, Republicans in recent weeks began to believe they had a real chance of retaking control of the Senate in November. But a major primary upset at the hands of a tea party insurgent on Tuesday may have put the Senate GOP's dreams of a majority at serious risk.

In the biggest electoral surprise of the night, conservative activist Christine O'Donnell defeated longtime GOP Rep. Mike Castle in Delaware's Republican Senate primary. Castle, a moderate who once served as the state's governor, had been so favored to win in November that his decision to run had reportedly influenced Democrat Beau Biden, son of Vice President Joe Biden, to abandon plans to seek his father's old seat.

But with O'Donnell's come-from-nowhere win Tuesday night, top Republicans in Washington now see virtually no chance the GOP will be able to pick up the Delaware seat this fall. As a result, they admit their already slim chance of winning back Republican control of the Senate is likely dead.

"It's hard to see a path for us," one senior Republican official, who declined to be named while discussing party strategy, told The Upshot. "Never say never, but it has become much harder for us after tonight."

According to Public Policy Polling, just 31 percent of Delaware voters believe O'Donnell is "fit" to hold office. She trails Democrat opponent Chris Coons by 26 points, according to the latest PPP survey. On Tuesday night, the National Republican Senatorial Committee issued a tepid statement of congratulations to O'Donnell, but a GOP official told Fox News the party has no plans of putting money into the race.

Still, O'Donnell's surprise victory was significant win for the Tea Party Express, which spent $250,000 at the last minute to boost O'Donnell's campaign. Since the first primaries in early spring, she's the eighth tea party-endorsed candidate to defeat an establishment-backed GOP contender in an election cycle that has been dominated by voters choosing change over experience. Two weeks ago, Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski lost her primary race to Joe Miller, who was backed by Palin and the Tea Party. Other surprise tea party wins among Senate candidates this year include Sharron Angle in Nevada and Rand Paul in Kentucky. In Florida, Marco Rubio was also endorsed by tea party activists, although he's tried to move toward the middle since winning the primary last month.

The difference between O'Donnell and other tea party-backed Senate candidates is she's running in a state that traditionally elects moderates. O'Donnell, a perennial candidate who once argued against masturbation on a MTV special, is not likely to move toward the middle, as Rubio has, and she doesn't look to benefit from the same anti-incumbent wave that's driven Angle's poll numbers against Harry Reid in Nevada. That's the key reason why national Republicans are so loathe to embrace O'Donnell's candidacy. Not that she cares.

"They have a losing track record," O'Donnell told CNN Tuesday night. "If they're too lazy to put in the effort that we need to win, then so be it."
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
Same deal as Nevada where the Teapartiers elected Sharon Angle to run against Harry Reid - "The only person in America who could get Harry elected".
 

Mags

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2000
2,813
27
48
Same deal as Nevada where the Teapartiers elected Sharon Angle to run against Harry Reid - "The only person in America who could get Harry elected".

Unfortunately, that is so true.

The Tea Party, while I admire their drive, values, and committment, will basically hand this election to the liberals - by screwing up the election......

Oh well....

When you have extremists on both sides (like Reid and Angle), the better known one will win.
 

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
A little background on Christine O'Donnell...

A little background on Christine O'Donnell...

Tea Party candidate: Masturbation is the same as adultery

By David Edwards and Muriel Kane
Wednesday, September 8th, 2010 -- 12:38 pm

O'Donnell, who is backed by the Tea Party Express, is running in next week's Delaware Senate primary against Rep. Mike Castle. Castle, a former governor, has been winning elections in Delaware by large margins since 1966, and in any normal year his victory would be assured. But this year, nothing can be taken for granted.

O'Donnell's views appear to be particularly extreme, even by Tea Party standards. In 1998, she told an MTV interviewer that masturbation is the same as adultery because "the Bible says that lust in your heart is committing adultery. So you can't masturbate without lust."

In an article written about the same time, the fiercely Catholic O'Donnell declared, "When a married person uses pornography, or is unfaithful, it compromises not just his (or her) purity, but also compromises the spouse's purity. As a church, we need to teach a higher standard than abstinence."

O'Donnell's character has also become an issue in the campaign. She recently told the Weekly Standard that she doesn't give out the location of her house because it was broken into and vandalized during the 2008 campaign -- even though there is no police report of any such incident.

"They?re following me," O'Donnell claimed. "They follow me home at night. I make sure that I come back to the townhouse and then we have our team come out and check all the bushes and check all the cars to make sure that?they follow me....They knock on the door at all hours of the night. They?re hiding in the bushes when I?m at candidate forums."

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/09/tea-party-masturbation-adultry/

Will the last sane person in the Republican party please turn out the lights when you leave... :142smilie
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
This is what happens what the nut balls try to emulate the "Tea Party"

One of the GREATEST Guitar Players EVER, and he never had a chance to live long enough to live up to his potential RIP Randy Rhoads

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JRbPWcLode0?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JRbPWcLode0?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
Quick vote

Are Tea Party victories in the primaries good or bad for the GOP?


Bad 58% 42805
Good 31% 22680
No impact 11% 8134
Total votes: 73619
..........................................................

neo cons :142smilie

they just may blow it yet :toast:
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
where's that from KOD ?

DUDE ! that special has gone from $79 to $99 :nono:
..........................................................

that is from cnn.com quick poll

it is posted on the far right of the news page.

If you dont vote you dont count.

Get behind me Satan

:)
 

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,859
665
113
50
TX
Unfortunately, that is so true.

The Tea Party, while I admire their drive, values, and committment, will basically hand this election to the liberals - by screwing up the election......

Oh well....

When you have extremists on both sides (like Reid and Angle), the better known one will win.

totally agree
 

smurphy

cartographer
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,910
135
63
16
L.A.
:
With polls showing significant GOP momentum this fall, Republicans in recent weeks began to believe they had a real chance of retaking control of the Senate in November. But a major primary upset at the hands of a tea party insurgent on Tuesday may have put the Senate GOP's dreams of a majority at serious risk.

stop being so partisan. i've had it with this leftist website.
:sadwave:
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
stop being so partisan. i've had it with this leftist website.
:sadwave:

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bc7t_ET6SNQ?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bc7t_ET6SNQ?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
Watchdog group: Delaware candidate's spending 'flat-out illegal'By the CNN Wire Staff
September 18, 2010 5:50 a.m. EDT

A spokesperson for O'Donnell has not responded to requests for comment

The 41-year-old upset winner of Delaware's GOP primary is aligned with the Tea Party
(CNN) -- A watchdog group says it plans to ask authorities in Delaware to investigate Senate candidate Christine O'Donnell's finances.

At issue are more than $20,000 of spending in 2009 and 2010 that Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington claims was illegal.

"It turns out Miss O'Donnell has treated her campaign funds like they are her very own personal piggy bank. She's used that money to pay for things like her rent, for gas, meals and even a bowling outing. And that's just flat-out illegal," said Melanie Sloan, the group's executive director.

In an interview on CNN's "AC360," Sloan said her organization would be sending letters to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Delaware and the Federal Elections Commission on Monday asking them to investigate.

Delaware
"For example, in 2009, Miss O'Donnell wasn't a candidate for anything, yet she had numerous campaign expenses, things like travel and gas, and yet she had no actual campaign," Sloan said.

O'Donnell's spokesperson did not respond to requests for comment.

Speaking Friday afternoon at the Values Voters Summit in Washington, O'Donnell discussed the increased scrutiny she has faced as she has moved from a virtual unknown to a Sarah Palin-style celebrity in a matter of days.

"Will they attack us? Yes. Will they smear our background and distort our record? Undoubtedly. Will they lie about us, harass our families, name call and try to intimidate us? They will. There's nothing safe about it. But is it worth it?....Are those unalienable rights worth a little alienation from the beltway popular crowd. Yes! I say yes, yes, a thousand times yes," she said.

Sloan said Friday that her organization's complaint to the Federal Elections Commission will allege that O'Donnell abused campaign funds for personal use and made false statements on forms she filed with the Federal Elections Commission.

But Sloan said her organization's scrutiny had nothing to do with partisan politics. She noted that her organization had also recently called for Rep. Charles Rangel, D-New York, to step down after allegations of ethics violations.

"We're about right and wrong and not about black or white, Republican or Democrat," she said. "And it is flat-out wrong for a candidate for the U.S. Senate to be stealing her campaign funds and be using them for personal use."

Politically, O'Donnell is firmly aligned with Tea Party movement, which funneled more than $150,000 to her campaign shortly before Tuesday's primary. Largely opposed to abortion rights and gun control, she has been endorsed by two conservative populists -- former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and Sen. Jim DeMint of South Carolina.

The 41-year-old upset winner of Delaware's GOP Senate primary may be a blank slate to most Americans, but she is no stranger to political bosses in what had been -- until Tuesday -- one of the country's last safe havens for moderate Republicans.

O'Donnell, single with no children, has run for the U.S. Senate three times in five years. She finished a distant third in the GOP primary fight in 2006 before running uncontested for the right to challenge then-Sen. Joe Biden in 2008.

Her claim that Biden had turned his back on Delaware when he joined Barack Obama's ticket fell on largely deaf ears; she lost by roughly 30 percentage points.
..................................................................

Just what we need. Another right wing tea bagging crook in the Senate.

They all start out this way because they dont have real job. They need to take the campaign funds for bills even when they aint running for anything yet.

Then when they get in there they make their backdoor millions screwing over American taxpayers.

Its a pathetic cycle.
 

lowell

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 6, 2003
9,177
89
48
if elected she will fit in nicely with rangel, geitner and daschele.
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
She's just one more Palin* wannabee. Knows nothing, has never done anything, steals like a cat and lies like a dog.

However she'll be a big hit with the crowd which believes intentional ignorance is a virtue.

*Wasilla hillbillies raiding Nieman-Marcus coast to coast.

"Expensive clothes? Oh, you must mean those clothes I borrowed from John McCain. They just happen to fit me perfectly. It's lucky we wear the same size bra."
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
This ODonnel said she was interested in withcraft in 1999

She and Palin will have alot in common

two witchs on brooms:scared
 

rusty

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 24, 2006
4,627
11
0
Under a mask.
I actually think its a wake-up call for everybody.Maybe Rand Paul's victory wasn't a fluke after all and people have really had enough.

The biggest mistake moderate GOP's can do now is turn their heads to the taxed enough already party.
I think it would be a mistake.

I still say Dems have better watch out this November.Case in point would be Barney Frank bringing in Clinton to campaign for him after 16 straight year's of victory's.Why?
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
Misunderstood and used as race bait!!

Good signature, rusty, but you're more like fish bait - chum.

Intentional ignorance, rusty, that's you.

How do they stand you, rusty? Mass? That's a state full of well educated folks who can think clearly.

Maybe you're just kidding us with your profile, you're really from lower SC?
 
Last edited:
Bet on MyBookie
Top