I'm just curious to know if anyone here has ever or known anyone first hand who has beaten legislature of random drug testing at work.
The municipality I work for went to random drug testing as part of a contract agreement early last year and we have a guy that pissed dirty for weed. The problem he has is that although never disclosed as part of the agreement, they are forcing him to pay for his tests now (or it is considered a positive test), he had to pay his insurance portion normally paid for by the City while he was suspended (and again was told to him after the fact). We have no literature on the testing (it is the same rules as the DOT samsa 5 or something like that) and there are all sorts of new rules that seem to come up like 'alternates' having to go in the stead of a person who is out on that particular day and then the person who was out being tested upon their next work day, the question of random selection etc...
I'm not looking for ways to beat it. Not looking for the magic masks etc...
I smoked weed for 25 years and gave it up cold turkey and although I miss the shit out of it, I just get by on painkillers and booze now. We can take all the acid and mushrooms we want and the quick out of your system drugs are more prevalent to the people who used to just toke a little so many of us feel it just pushed us to alter our uses.
So any lawyers in here that know of any literature or cases that have 'beaten' this type of legislature??
The municipality I work for went to random drug testing as part of a contract agreement early last year and we have a guy that pissed dirty for weed. The problem he has is that although never disclosed as part of the agreement, they are forcing him to pay for his tests now (or it is considered a positive test), he had to pay his insurance portion normally paid for by the City while he was suspended (and again was told to him after the fact). We have no literature on the testing (it is the same rules as the DOT samsa 5 or something like that) and there are all sorts of new rules that seem to come up like 'alternates' having to go in the stead of a person who is out on that particular day and then the person who was out being tested upon their next work day, the question of random selection etc...
I'm not looking for ways to beat it. Not looking for the magic masks etc...
I smoked weed for 25 years and gave it up cold turkey and although I miss the shit out of it, I just get by on painkillers and booze now. We can take all the acid and mushrooms we want and the quick out of your system drugs are more prevalent to the people who used to just toke a little so many of us feel it just pushed us to alter our uses.
So any lawyers in here that know of any literature or cases that have 'beaten' this type of legislature??
