12 Teams - 1 Trophy

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,539
263
83
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
NFL Postseason: 0-0 (+0.00*)

NFL Regular Season YTD: 56-46 (+6.05*)
NCAA Bowl Season YTD: 7-7 (-0.98*)
NCAA Regular Season YTD: 59-62 (-9.70*)
Top Plays (included above): 4-1 (+4.35*)


Cincinnati(-6')(-113) over San Diego (2*)
- - An excellent Bengals team that just slammed the defending champs to the sidelines is ready to win a playoff game, and when they do, they will be carrying my largest wager of the season.


GL
 

Scrapman

Rollingdembones
Forum Member
Jan 6, 2013
5,929
112
63
south east PA
yeah i'm loving cincy also hugeeeeeeeee might go for a nickle on them but i still have to handicap this tilt in reality Chargers shouldnt be here Steelers should have got in but then Cincy would face Chiefs i think

other games i'm just leaning on some
 

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,539
263
83
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
New Orleans(+3)(-103) over Philadelphia (1*)
- - New Orleans has been on a mission all season, and now they are on a bit of a related mission to show they can get it done away from the Superdome. Arguably, New Orleans has actually had fewer poor road performances this year than Philadelphia has had poor home performances. IMO Philadelphia is overachieving at the moment, and I'll definitely take the Saints offense, defense, coaching and intangibles as a package in this game, and I'll also take the points as a bonus.

Indianapolis(+2') over Kansas City (1*)
- - Toughest game for me to come down on one side or another. But as noted elsewhere: "(Kansas City) has seven straight losses when getting points against winners of at least two straight. Eight straight losses when getting points against .600 or better teams. Chiefs cooling off in last two weeks, after Oakland and Washington self-destructed against them. Colts getting hot at the best possible time" . . . and a team with wins over Seattle, San Francisco and Denver looks to take the nesxt step. Andrew Luck will carry my cash as a dog at home today.

GL
 
Last edited:

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,539
263
83
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
Green Bay(+3)(-115) over San Francisco (1 Biscuit)
- - I'll keep it short . . . Green Bay's matchup strength and the source of a real bounce after the tolls of a depleting season is clearly the Aaron Rodgers led offense, armed with a significant upgrade since they last played the 49ers in the form of a legitimate threat with a running attack featuring Eddie Lacy . . . In some regards the weather conditions today are almost certainly too bone chilling and blustery for maximizing the Packers chances for an efficient offense that keeps the ball away from the 49ers offense, but those brutal and slick conditions will also effect the execution and game plan of the 49ers; a couple of confidence shaking miscues by QB Kaepernick (or his cohorts) with a slick ball, and some of the shakier trends of the 49ers over the course of this season could easily displace their balmy confidence to date in their recent matchups against the Packers . . . . The plain fact is the 49ers are not an unstoppable juggernaut, on offense or defense, and they were a good bit healthier all of last season, . . . On offense, it's pretty much been been feast or famine. http://blog.sfgate.com/49ers/2013/12/31/49ers-offensive-play-calling-a-review/ And on defense, the hobbled secondary of the 49ers has looked particularly vulnerable, giving up 399 yards through the air in their last game against Arizona, and they surrendered 341 such yards against Atlanta in the game before that . . . But make no mistake, the big question mark for the Packers on Sunday is their own defense, and if the Packers flop on that side of the ball, it could very well cost DC Dom Capers his job. http://www.jsonline.com/sports/pack...-to-make-an-impact-b99175507z1-238739331.html . . . And adding some stuff I read elsewhere, teams with less than 9 wins are perfect 6-0 ATS in week 18 Wildcard Round, winning 5 of those 6 games outright as underdogs. The Packers have 4 wins less than 49ers and these teams are 3-0 SU and ATS in first week of playoffs, winning all three games as home underdogs. First round playoffs favorites are 0-7 ATS if they won as favorites in same season head to head meeting in first 12 weeks of the season. And Super Bowl losers are 0-5 SU and 0-4-1 ATS on the road in game one of playoffs the following season . . . IMO those trends are meaningful and intriguing, but until Green Bay shows that their defense can make meaningful stops against the 49ers offense, I actually think San Francisco is probably the right side for wagering. But I like the prospects of the soft Packers at least getting another shot to line up against the 49ers on a brutal January day at Lambeau. We'll know the outcome shortly.

GL
 

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,539
263
83
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
NFL Postseason: 2-1 (-0.26*)

Seattle(-8)(-116) over New Orleans (1*)
- - I was there with New Orleans winning their first road playoff game in 46 seasons against an overachieving and wide-eyed Philadelphia team. What a different animal they are tasked with facing today.

GL
 

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,539
263
83
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
NFL Postseason: 3-2 (-0.36*)
NFL Regular Season YTD: 56-46 (+6.05*)

NCAA Bowl Season YTD: 13-11 (+1.12*)
NCAA Regular Season YTD: 59-62 (-9.70*)

Top Plays (included above): 5-2 (+3.59*)

All Plays YTD: 131-121 (-2.89*)

- - I feel I've had these playoff games capped too well to be sitting at 3-2-2 and down the juice, and I needed an epic Indianapolis comeback just to get that . . . Now there are only 5 games left in the season, so last night I probably blew my chance of getting over the hump.


San Francisco(+1)(-116) over Carolina (1*)
- - I have definite opinions on how this game plays out, but pulling the trigger in this one is harder for me than every playoff game so far except Indy over Kansas City: (1) QB Colin Kaepernick will struggle leading the SF offense against that sound Carolina defense, between the 20s and in the red zone, even though he has better weapons all around him than Carolina QB Cam Newton . . . (2) I don't understand at all the stuff I've been reading this week about Carolina HC Ron Rivera as some sort of riverboat gambler, because his MO has been to play far too conservative on offense, and just like so many defensive minded coaches with elite defenses, it sure seems he trys to not let his offense lose the game. QB Newton has much better throwing fundamentals than Kaepernick, but he's still a project with his accuracy and reads (and sometimes his footwork) until the game is on the line, and then this season he has shown some brilliance in the closing stretches when he plays with no margin for error . . . (3) No question this early game today adds to a brutal stretch for San Fran against a fresh legged home squad, but the Niners as Super Bowl losers have weathered a brutal campaign all season and IMO have emerged to this point in beautiful fashion, and I have no doubt SF will be right there late in this game, and my money likes the chances of the Niners getting past Carolina with their superior coaching, playoff experience, and better weapons on offense which will be better utilized than Carolina will utilize their available weapons . . . I reject this line of thinking for leading this Carolina squad very far toward the promised land of the Lombardi Trophy: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2014/01/10/4602236/turn-it-up-for-playoffs-means.html#.UtKihvsUYVA


GL
 

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,539
263
83
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
Denver(-8) over San Diego (1*)
- - Maybe Denver has been focused for a full year, and then waited one more week, to let a team waltz in to their house and smack them down when it matters most. While I have concerns about the advantages San Diego HC Mike McCoy has in knowing the tendencies of Peyton Manning on offense and the Broncos on defense, Denver gets my money today.

GL
 
Last edited:

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,539
263
83
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
NFL Postseason: 4-3 (-0.46*)
NFL Regular Season YTD: 56-46 (+6.05*)

NCAA Bowl Season YTD: 13-11 (+1.12*)
NCAA Regular Season YTD: 59-62 (-9.70*)

Top Plays (included above): 5-2 (+3.59*)

All Plays YTD: 132-122 (-2.99*)

More lost juice last week. Felt like I deserved a better fate. Expecting something less than 2-0 this week.


San Francisco(+3') over Seattle (1*)
- - ODDS and ENDS:

(1) I don't think you've been paying attention if you haven't noticed that San Francisco has completely defied recent NFL trends by being formidable all season and then peaking late while wearing the mantle of Super Bowl loser, while Seattle has not been making any significant strides since November. On the other hand, it's not defying recent NFL trends to say that if you can find a hot team in January, that's a big plus.

(2) In order to have a realistic chance to take on the 12th Man in Seattle and win, I think it is very important that you have some recent experience in the role. I expected New Orleans to get smoked when they went to Seattle for the first time this year, but the second time they arrived saltier and resolute to shock the world; I still liked Seattle, but I didn't dismiss the chances of New Orleans as the visitor. The new regime in Arizona had the benefit of looking to avenge a 58-0 mauling from the prior season. If Carolina was paying an "initial visit" to Seattle today off the heady accomplishment of winning a playoff game, I would expect Seattle to overwhelm them early and often . . . Not only does San Francisco have plenty of familiarity with their division rival, they have a collective point to prove in their biggest game of the year. And I can look at the matchups across the board in this game and confidently say that unless Seattle manages to get inside Colin Kaepernick's head and unhinge him completely from his identity as a 4-1 starting quarterback in post season games, then I like the San Francisco team that was down 5-0 at halftime (after a 60 minute thunderstorm delay) in their earlier trip to Seattle to be playing huge on this stage. But this game in this environment has a field goal difference written all over it without a rash of turnovers.

(3) Over his last five games, I believe Seattle QB Russell Wilson is averaging 157 passing ypg, but coach Pete Carroll says he is "playing great." I expect San Francisco to do a strong job today of making Wilson try and beat them from the pocket with an inferior arsenal of weapons. It will be a big chore to beat the Niners if you are one dimensional, even if that dimension is Marshawn Lynch . . . If Seattle sets a fierce tempo in this game, IMO it will only come about if the moment is too big for Kaepernick, and I think he's got way too much support available to let the game get away from him in that manner. But this game in this environment has field goal written all over it without a rash of turnovers.

(4) Blurbs from elsewhere . . . "Former 49ers quarterback Steve Young, on his weekly KNBR radio show, gave the 49ers a clear advantage. He loves the way Kaepernick has played of late and has his doubts that Seattle's formula of relying on a smash-mouth running game, suffocating defense and utilizing the crowd noise will be enough. "I think they can do that to most teams in the league, and if the 49ers go in and have the noise and chaos and interceptions and are behind 17-3, then that system works," Young said. "It just seems to me that the 49ers are the grittier team, more offensively expansive, and put more pressure on people." Former New York Giants quarterback and current CBS analyst Phil Simms said Seattle's passing offense hasn't progressed in recent weeks but lauded Wilson's ability to avoid mistakes . . . "Wilson hasn't thrown for more than 206 yards in his last five games. On third down he has completed less than 47 percent of his passes and has been sacked seven times, just on third down. The Seahawks have a poor 29 percent third-down conversion rate in that stretch. I can't tell you exactly what is causing Wilson's slump, but you can see it. Sometimes it just happens. In basketball, a great shooter can go into a shooting slump. Wilson is playing a little tentatively and his game has become unstructured and random. Even on his biggest play of the game last week against New Orleans he was off. Wilson has been inaccurate on too many basic throws, especially quick slants. He was inaccurate on a quick slant to Golden Tate in the first quarter last week against the Saints on a third and 5. That's a routine throw Wilson has to make. Wilson at times is throwing with a locked front leg, which negatively impacts accuracy. That's especially noticeable in quick passing game. At this point Wilson is more of a random quarterback than a precision pocket player. There's too much inconsistency in his play. Wilson has become tentative in the pocket, and not willing to pull the trigger the way he did earlier in the season. And five games is a meaningful enough sample size to indicate he is struggling. (H)e could have a good game Sunday because I think he's a good player on a really good team. But I?d be surprised if he?s precise and efficient from the pocket, because he hasn't been for weeks. But he could improvise and make a few big plays and the numbers would look great; that wouldn?t surprise me. The same statement about improvising and making plays goes for 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick, although he's not in a slump. Kaepernick is not a polished progression reader as a quarterback yet, but he is dangerous. It?s hard to be a quarterback in this league as an unstructured player, but you can make plays and he does." . . . "One other thing I wanted to mention is the noise at CenturyLink Field. There are tactical ramifications of crowd noise. It?s not just that it?s cool because it gets to earthquake levels. San Francisco's running game gets affected in Seattle. Kaepernick had 87 of the 49ers' 100 rushing yards in the first meeting this year in Seattle, a 29-3 Seahawks win. If you have a "check with me" system in the run game, that means the quarterback comes to the line and calls the play. If San Francisco has a power called to the left, Kaepernick could come to line and see a safety on the left side and know that?s where strength of defense is. He might want to switch the run to the right. The front determines the play when it's "check with me," but the quarterback doesn't know the front until he gets to the line of scrimmage. That is where the noise impacts the game tactically. It?s hard to communicate with the noise. You have to communicate this change and if you can?t you?ll have problems."

(5) Yea, I noted last week against Carolina there was no question San Fran is in the midst of a brutal stretch of games, but I had no doubt SF would be right there late in that game with their superior coaching, playoff experience, and better weapons . . . This may be the week when their tank is on empty or too low to compete effectively, but my cash says they are right there late in the game again this week with a trip to the Super Bowl for some unfinished business on the line.


GL
 
Last edited:

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,539
263
83
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
Denver(-4') over New England (1*)
- - ODDS and ENDS:

(1) "The Book" says a Bill Belichick defense is the best at taking away something you do well. "The Book" says Peyton Manning is the best at finding or creating holes in a defense and taking what the defense gives him . . . In this case I think the firepower of the Denver offense has the advantage over the New England defense.

(2) "My book" says HC John Fox doesn't know how to put teams away in a big game or when the opponent is not a cupcake. "Conventional wisdom" says a game between these two legendary quarterbacks comes down to the last team with the ball . . . My gut tells me the backdoor and/or frontdoor in this one won't be closed unless the Denver defense plays above themselves and makes a stop when New England has the ball late.

(3) I think the huge pressure is now off Denver and the intangibles line up in their favor, and with more favorable matchups to exploit, Manning "having the best year in NFL history" gets past Brady doing it with grit and mirrors.

GL
 

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,539
263
83
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
NFL Postseason: 5-4 (-0.56*)
NFL Regular Season YTD: 56-46 (+6.05*)


Seattle(+3)(-133) over Denver (1*)
- - ODDS and ENDS:

I have little doubt HC Pete Carroll has been pushing his guys buttons with, "Everybody wants Peyton Manning to win, everyone hates you, you guys are the villains." . . . I see Seattle as the more talented team, the deeper team having one of the healthiest seasons of any team in the league; they play physical and with tremendous speed; they play well on special teams. They have all that going for them, and now they are playing with a chip on their shoulder, so I doubt you can convince me Seattle will not have playmakers stepping up all over the field.

Seattle gets to the quarterback, no matter how mobile, or in this case, no matter how brilliant and decisive; no way do I see Peyton having a comfortable ride in this game. Seattle roughs up receivers. Seattle brings sure tackling and maintains integrity in their schemes. Seattle isn't complicated, but Pete Carroll has admitted they will bring more of their coverages and packages than they usually fall back on . . . The way I see it, the Denver offense is going to have a tough road against Seattle in grinding out sustained drives without negative plays and tough down and distance situations, a tough time breaking off a very large collection of chunk plays to compensate, and a tough time finishing. The easy yardage on dump offs and quick outs will not be a dangerous component of their repertoire, and this isn't John Elway out there firing rockets through the tightest windows in February, it's Peyton being cerebral and wearing gloves.

17-0 and 23-3 in their two playoff games at home, with Peyton getting only slightly touched on two plays in those two games. It's like Denver hasn't faced any adversity at all in almost two months. I think they get a full plate of adversity in this game, and maybe they handle it like champions, but it's coming . . . That Seattle defense travels well, and they play well as a dog (although that's a rarity this season).

It's a legitimate question to ask what kind of game QB Russell Wilson will deliver. The Denver defense is very good in spots at making plays, but they give up far too many big plays over sustained stretches against a much weaker schedule to set the tone in this game if the Seattle offense holds it's own. Wilson has always posed the biggest threat to make plays in unscripted situations, but as analyst Ron Jaworski has pointed out, the San Francisco game was the first time in weeks when Wilson was on the mark with all of his required throws, effectively coming out of an obvious slump. Maybe it was temporary, but he looks prepared for this moment off his two year trend lines.

Neither team has Super Bowl experience worth speaking of except Peyton Manning. Hell, HC John Fox was already responsible for one near fatal error in these playoffs when Denver went so conservative against San Diego that they were unprepared to know what looks they would get from San Diego on crucial 3rd downs late in the game, so don't tell me having Fox on the sideline is some big game advantage, unless you can sell me Denver draws some great inspiration from Fox's earlier health concerns . . . Last year for the Super Bowl I posted: "The Ravens have vocal leaders on their team, and a chemistry of strong personalities, it?s hard to argue with that. John Harbaugh has a comfort level with the identity the Ravens have built in their locker room on this journey. Jim Harbaugh is THE leader of the 49ers; the entire team takes their cues from him. If he?s uptight for this contest, there?s a good chance his team is uptight." . . . This year, Pete Carroll and Peyton Manning are the acknowledged leaders of their respective teams, and I definitely think it is more likely Manning rather than Carroll might be giving off cues that would have their inexperienced teams feeling uptight as the game draws close.

I've just been waiting for these two weeks to see how close the line might get to -3 before making my play, but I was always ready to pull the trigger if a bad weather forecast sent the line back towards Seattle . . .Two weeks ago there was really no question the NFC was going to be favored today, and I really missed out on the startling developments which changed that equation . . . I'm actually no fan of Pete Carroll and his regime. "Go Hawks", my ass; the whole team can eat a bag of dicks and I'd be happy. In fact, they can lose this ginormous game and I can still win my bet, which would be fine by me . . . I could make a case for Denver, but I don't think it would be as strong of a case . . . I'll be letting the live dog carry my cash into the 4th quarter in this one.


GL
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top