Dogs, is there a point to this?
My point was in reply to Gregg statement-
"This "right" to vote for felons has been debated for years and is really a non-issue and as the posted article clearly states,
has no bearing on Obama whatsoever."
If it has no bearing--why is one side fighting to get felons registered and no id required for voting--and the other side against it?
A prudent person could see that evidently each party does think it has a bearing.
---and a step further--with liberals ingnoring fed law in setting up sacntuary cities for illegals--plus O wanting to give them healtcare and tax refunds--who do you think they'd support?
--and another step
With liberals/O
against humiliating terrorist prisoners
-want to get them attorney's
Access to U.S. courts U.S. courts
-limit Fisa
--no coerced interrogations
-surrender and retreat vs terrorist
ETC
I believe we can conclude there is little doubt who they'd support.
So I guess
my point is Smurph--I don't care much for your current nor future prospects of your parties base.
:0corn