8/6/01 presidential daily briefing

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
The text of a declassified presidential daily intelligence briefing from Aug. 6, 2001 made public on Saturday by the White House. Portions marked "x" were blacked out before release.
Bin Ladin Determined to Strike in US

Clandestine, foreign government, and media reports indicate Bin Ladin since 1997 has wanted to conduct terrorist attacks in the U.S. Bin Ladin implied in US television interviews in 1997 and 1998 that his followers would follow the example of World Trade Center bomber Ramzi Yousef and "bring the fighting to America."

After US missile strikes on his base in Afghanistan in 1998, Bin Ladin told followers he wanted to retaliate in Washington, according to xxxxxxxxxxx service.

An Egyptian Islamic Jihad (EIJ) operative told an xxxxxxxxxx service at the same time that Bin Ladin was planning to exploit the operative's access to the US to mount a terrorist strike.

The millennium plotting in Canada in 1999 may have been part of Bin Ladin's first serious attempt to implement a terrorist strike in the US. Convicted plotter Ahmed Ressam has told the FBI that he conceived the idea to attack Los Angeles International Airport himself, but that Bin Ladin lieutenant Abu Zubaydah encouraged him and helped facilitate the operation. Ressam also said that in 1998 Abu Zubaydah was planning his own US attack.

Ressam says Bin Ladin was aware of the Los Angeles operation.

Although Bin Ladin has not succeeded, his attacks against the US Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998 demonstrate that he prepares operations years in advance and is not deterred by setbacks. Bin Ladin associates surveilled our Embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam as early as 1993, and some members of the Nairobi cell planning the bombings were arrested and deported in 1997.

Al-Qa'ida members _ including some who are US citizens _ have resided in or traveled to the US for years, and the group apparently maintains a support structure that could aid attacks. Two al-Qa'ida members found guilty in the conspiracy to bomb our Embassies in East Africa were US citizens, and a senior EIJ member lived in California in the mid-1990s.

A clandestine source said in 1998 that a Bin Ladin cell in New York was recruiting Muslim-American youth for attacks.

We have not been able to corroborate some of the more sensational threat reporting, such as that from a xxxxxxxxxx service in 1998 saying that Bin Ladin wanted to hijack a US aircraft to gain the release of "Blind Shaykh" 'Umar 'Abd al-Rahman and other US-held extremists.

Nevertheless, FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York.

The FBI is conducting approximately 70 full field investigations throughout the US that it considers Bin Ladin-related. CIA and the FBI are investigating a call to our Embassy in UAE in May saying that a group of Bin Ladin supporters was in the US planning attacks with explosives.
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
Skyscraper Suicide-Hijak warnings came during the Clinton era

Skyscraper Suicide-Hijak warnings came during the Clinton era

"Well before the Sept. 11 attacks, U.S. intelligence officials warned that terrorists linked to Osama bin Laden planned a 'spectacular attack' that involved kamikaze pilots crashing U.S. airliners into targets that included the Pentagon, the Capitol building and significant U.S. 'skyscrapers.'"

That could be the lead sentence from one of today's news reports touting the CIA's August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Briefing as a warning President Bush should have heeded to prevent the Sept. 11 attacks.

But in fact, those warnings, which are actually far more specific than anything contained in the Bush PDB, were delivered during the Clinton administration - via intelligence that was so well known it was covered newspaper reports at the time.

In a June 1997 report in the Dayton Daily News, for instance, CIA Director George Tenet warned that Islamic terrorists had already succeeded in "expanding their networks, improving their skills and sophistication, and [were] working to stage more spectacular attacks."

One-time FBI counterrorism chief John O'Neill, who was killed in the World Trade Center attacks, was quoted in the same pre-9/11 report as saying that terrorists already in our midst "have the capability and the support infrastructure in the United States to attack us here if they choose to."

What's more, by the time of the Sept. 11 attacks, U.S. intelligence had known for years that al Qaeda wanted to train kamikaze pilots to carry out 9/11-style attacks against buildings like the World Trade Center.

Reports published just two months after 9/11 explained that the blueprint for 9/11 attacks was uncovered during 1995 interrogations of Abdul Hakim Murad, partner of convicted 1993 World Trade Center bomber Ramzi Yousef.

According to the Washington Post, Yousef's plot to plant bombs on 12 commercial U.S. airliners and blow them up over the Pacific "called for a second, perhaps even more ambitious phase, as interrogators discovered when they pressed Murad about his pilot's license.

"All those years in flight school, he confessed, had been in preparation for a suicide mission. He was to buy, rent, or steal -- that part of the plan had not yet been worked out -- a small plane, preferably a Cessna, fill it with explosives and crash it into CIA headquarters."

The Post continued:

"There were secondary targets the terrorist cell wanted hit: Congress, the White House, the Pentagon and possibly some skyscrapers. The only problem, Murad complained, was that they needed more trained pilots to carry out the plot."

What's clear is that under Osama bin Laden's direction, the two plots were merged, and Murad's Cessna suicide mission evolved into the hijacking of four commercial U.S. airliners. In fact, the 1997 Daily News report says that while Murad attended U.S. flight schools, he "studied 747s."

The above information is far more specific than anything reportedly revealed in the Aug. 6, 2001 briefing given to President Bush - and was available to President Clinton via published reports [if not through the intelligence briefings he routinely avoided] for most of his second term in office.

As the media point fingers at Bush, however, no one seems particularly interested in asking Mr. Clinton why he ignored for years relatively clear warnings that 9/11 was coming.
 

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,716
290
83
53
Belly of the Beast
More of that liberal media coming from the Post

I love how it talks about thwarted attacks against the LA Nat'l Airport for the millenium. I don't remember hearing about that.
Nor have I ever heard about a plot to crash the 12 airliners over the Ocean. Nor an attack on the CIA HQ, the UN building, the Vatican, Boston's airport, the Lincoln tunnel, nor the first attempted strike on the Pentagon. All tried under Clinton's watch and all failed.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
168
63
Bowling Green Ky
"A clandestine source said in 1998 that a Bin Ladin cell in New York was recruiting Muslim-American youth for attacks"

A little known fact is the recuitings going on in prisons by Muslims.
Think of what demographical part population in U.S. converts to Muslim primarily?????

Think about the initial war riots in CA NY and DC and who they were found to initiated by.

The Muslims prey on the weak and uneducated who have an axe to grind for one reason or the other with a "It's not my fault attitude." What makes it even more dangerous is this is the most violent element in our population.
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
What should we do about it? It is clear that this is an unconventional war in which there is not a country that we can defeat. We have all ready blown the crap out of two countries and disolved their governments in the name of the War on Terrorism and still our soldiers get attaked daily. Now the insurgents (don't you love the way these words seem to pop up) are attacking aid workers and people sent to help them. We know they have no conscience. I am beginning to think we have to get their attention again. Things have changed since 9/11. I am not a Bush fan by any means but there was nothing he could have done to stop what happened on that terrible day. I think we should be focused on how to win this war now. We can sort this other crap out after it's over.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
excellent post

excellent post

dtb.......some great points in a concise one paragraph post.....

every time i walk into the wal-mart when i`m down by the city line,i`m astounded by the number of muslim garbed people that i see....and very few of them appear to be middle eastern folks....

it seems to have become sort of "cool" to be muslim in certain depressed areas(at least around baltimore city).....

i think,to a certain extent it`s sort of an anti-establishment phenomenon...it`s also very cool to be anti-american...even for some americans,unfortunately......

as far as all the terrorist plots "foiled" by the clinton administration,they are as complicit in the 9/11 tragedy as bush is....most of the security staff was carried over...and these
attacks were in the planning stages long before bush got near the capitol....clinton`s getting a pass in the 9/11 hearings...at least from the media...

of course,the hearings,imo,are nothing more than a political ploy to assign blame for 9/11 on bush and weaken him where he appears the strongest to the public...the war on terror....why else do you have an attack dog like clinton attorney ben-veniste on the panel?....and he did a great job....very sharp guy...and very partisan... the democrats are so much more politically savvy than the republicans.....if bush gets re-elected,it will be a minor miracle....

no terrorist attacks at home since 9/11....i`m sure that will change....but,it`s been a fairly long period of "inactivity" on our soil...

i`ll be honest,though,certain "incidents" that have taken place since 9/11 are somewhat suspicious,particularly the american airlines crash in belle harbor queens,ny on 11/12/01....killing 260 people...they were way to quick to label that a legit accident...

but,again,an excellent post,dtb...
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
There was enough info in that memo to put someone on guard. At least get a little fire started under there butts. But it didn't. Now of course they blow it off as it was nothing. I would to if I was running for election. Funny how any little thing now they pay attention to and change the color code for us all to be on the watch. Maybe they should have practice this a long time ago. More then enough in that memo to at least say lets folow up right down to our agents in the field. Why do I think Rice did not give that order. And it sounds like bush never told Rice to follow up. Lets see they tried the WTC in 93 the barricks in 98 and the Cole in 2000. Lets not worry about this memo.
 

ferdville

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 24, 1999
3,165
5
0
78
So Cal
djv - don't often agree with you but you have the bottom line dead on here. There is enough blame to go around. There were more than enough warnings that something like 9/11 was inevitable. Blame Bush, blame Clinton, blame our intelligence - doesn't much matter.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
168
63
Bowling Green Ky
terrorist attacks are impossible to stop regardless of who is president. The next pres regardless of who it is will take a pounding from in an situation that has no clear solution.
Makes no diff whether you fight it or look the other way.

The biggest strides I see is the terrorist are bringing all countries in against them now as they have now China pissed off.

The outcome will lie in the hands of the good Muslims who continue to sit on the sidelines. The time is coming when they have to get off the fence or get included in a world wide prejudice against Muslims in general.
 

bjfinste

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2001
5,462
18
0
AZ
DOGS THAT BARK said:
The biggest strides I see is the terrorist are bringing all countries in against them now as they have now China pissed off.

I just read about that tonight. Doesn't seem like the Iraqi insurgents are the brightest bulbs on the tree, pissing off a major political adversary of the US.

DOGS THAT BARK said:
The outcome will lie in the hands of the good Muslims who continue to sit on the sidelines. The time is coming when they have to get off the fence or get included in a world wide prejudice against Muslims in general.

I'm curious what you mean by this statement. I mean, if there are nutcases who take radical views of their faith, what are they supposed to do? What did Christians do differently after the incidents of McVeigh and Rudolph, both of whom were Christian terrorists? They did nothing, because McVeigh and Rudolph were radical extremes of an otherwise non-violent faith.
 

Eddie Haskell

Matt 02-12-11
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
4,595
41
0
26
Cincinnati
aclu.org
Why is it that most members of this country's Christian right fail to comprehend the fact that there is no difference between fundamental Christianity and fundamental Islam? Other than numbers, tell me the difference between flying a couple of planes into a couple of buildings while reciting verses from the Koran and bashing your 7 year olds head in with a rock on the front yard while reciting verses from the Bible.

It's amazing to me how the conservatives and racial profilers in this country are able to write off the actions of the Christian mother who killed her children with a rock as an insane person not really representing Christianity yet in the same breath catagorize all Muslims as terrorists and to be looked upon with suspicion based upon the actions of that religions insane members. Amazing.

Ed
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
168
63
Bowling Green Ky
BJ I do not in least agree with branding all Muslims but it will happen just as the radical right (skinheads ect) and extreme left have been branded. While the etrocities are the result of few, after a while their actions are stereotypyed--unjustly I might add.

Eddie "Why is it that most members of this country's Christian right fail to comprehend the fact that there is no difference between fundamental Christianity and fundamental Islam?"

I believe your brain dead:confused:
People like you are the cause of "the brading of left wing extremist in above"

For starters--How many Christians are massacreing 1000's of civilians in every country they exist in the name of God?

What a baffoon:rolleyes:
 

Eddie Haskell

Matt 02-12-11
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
4,595
41
0
26
Cincinnati
aclu.org
Wayne:

How many Muslims are? Sounds like your blessed.

So, what your saying is that Muslims who read the Koran and adopt of literal reading of that book are different than Christians who adopt a literal reading of the Bible. By the way, how bout dem Crusades. Onward Christian soldiers.

Bigot.

Ed
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Any Religion that brain washes there followers to the degree that there right any everone else is just someplace else. That is high risk. We have plenty of that here at home.
But anyway they did not bring any of that up in that PDB. What they did should have open some eyes to ask a few more questions. LIKE WHEN. The title beggs someone to ask that. Anyone have any idea when Bin and his gang wish to hit the USA. We cant always just be out on fund raisers.
 

bjfinste

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2001
5,462
18
0
AZ
djv said:
Any Religion that brain washes there followers to the degree that there right any everone else is just someplace else.

All religions do that.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Sorry mind at least my church tells the word of god. And I never here any politics. And I am thankful for that. My minister isn't running around trying to be president. Now is he helping raise funds for any reelection of anyone. You wont see him on TV trying to tell everyone he's right and everyone else is left.
My minister tells it as it should be. Politics is everyone right to believe as they want. And The CHURCH should stay out of it. It is a private matter. And religion need not try to spin peoples minds.
Now If Rice would have only followed up on that memo.
 

saint

Go Heels
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
9,501
140
63
Balls Deep
I think this whole memo thing is completely blown out of proportion. This one memo was probably in a stack of 100 memos that day. I'm sure for everything that has ever happened in this country there has been a memo somehow referencing it beforehand. I'd be more worried had Bin Laden attacked us and we had never even heard of him, rather than us being aware of his existence. It would be different had the memo given specific dates etc and we falied to act on it, but there is only so much we can do as such a large country with the continuous influx of threats we probably deal with on a daily basis. :rolleyes:


How come the media doesn't declassify and print on it's front page the thousands of memos warning of potential threats that haven't come to fruition due to action by the government?
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Saint the memo was not part of 1000. It was the one and only one they acted on that day. They all say that. They just didnt think there was much there to worry about. I guess they were wrong. Some one for got to follow up. The Title of the memo should have gotten more attetion. He was determind and pulled it off.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
c`mon,ed

c`mon,ed

that`s just a horrible comparison.....i`m no fan of the radical christian right,but,to compare them to what`s going on with muslim extremists ALL OVER THE WORLD is a stretch of monumental proportions...

and the crusades?.....maybe you can compare what`s going on now with radical islam to the crusades.....that might be a fairly valid comparison...

but,what i believe is very evident is that theocracies usually result in the stagnation of a society on many different levels.....we don`t live in a theocracy.....many muslims do....and as a result,their societies as a whole have not yet progressed out of the middle ages....and that`s even in rich countries like saudi arabia,maybe one of the more oppreessive societies...


religion and patriarchy justifying age old oppression...there can never be real equality in a society dominated by religion...and that is the end game for these fanatics...

the cutting off of hands,the oppression of women(acid throwing,dowry deaths,in some muslim countries,the illiteracy rate of women hovers around 80%),torturing....



if we are expected to acknowledge that islam is a religion of peace, one that preaches tolerance and equality, one that preaches freedom of religion, one that preaches the brotherhood of men, one that in short is not a threat to western values, culture, and society, then perhaps they ought to undertake a more active role in supressing the radicals who have tarnished islam and who, by virtue of the enemies they have made and seek to make, threaten the very existance of islam...

there are about 1.3 billion muslims in the world today......i`ve heard that about 1% of those all radical fundamentalists... well,that equates to about 13,000,000 people willing to commit acts of violence, acts of terror, acts of murder. ...i believe that 1% is a ridiculously conservative estimate...

radical islam is quickly becoming a very real threat to the west. perhaps pure, true islam, as passed to mohammed by allah is not a threat. The problem is, that is not the sort of islam practiced by millions of people around the world today...
 
Last edited:
Bet on MyBookie
Top