9 US soldiers killed in Afghanistan

Spytheweb

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 27, 2005
1,171
14
0
Jul 13, 2:20 PM EDT


KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) -- A multi-pronged militant assault on a small, remote U.S. base killed nine American soldiers and wounded 15 Sunday in the deadliest attack on U.S. forces in Afghanistan in three years, officials said.

The attack on the U.S. outpost came the same day a suicide bomber targeting a police patrol killed 24 people, while U.S. coalition and Afghan soldiers killed 40 militants elsewhere in the south.

The militant assault on the American troops began around 4:30 a.m. in a dangerous region close to the Pakistan border and lasted throughout the day.

Militants fired machine guns, rocket-propelled grenades and mortars from homes and a mosque in the village of Wanat in the mountainous northeastern province of Kunar, NATO's International Security Assistance Force said in a statement.

Nine U.S. troops were killed in the attack, a Western official said on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to release the troops' nationalities.

NATO confirmed nine of its soldiers had been killed and 15 wounded. Four Afghan soldiers also were wounded, NATO said.

"Although no final assessment has been made, it is believed insurgents suffered heavy casualties during several hours of fighting," NATO said in a statement.

Lt. Col. Rumi Nielson-Green, the top U.S. military spokeswoman in Afghanistan, said she could not comment because the fight was ongoing.

The attack appeared to be the deadliest for U.S. troops in Afghanistan since June 2005, when 16 American troops were killed - also in Kunar province - when their helicopter was shot down by a rocket-propelled grenade.

Those troops were on their way to rescue a four-man team of Navy SEALs caught in a militant ambush. Three SEALs were killed, the fourth was rescued days later by a farmer.

Sunday's attack came during a period of rising violence in Afghanistan. Monthly death tolls of U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan surpassed U.S. military deaths in Iraq in May and June. Last Monday, a suicide bomber attacked the Indian Embassy in Kabul, killing 58 people in the deadliest attack in the Afghan capital since 2001.

In two other incidents this month, an Afghan government commission found that U.S. aircraft killed 47 civilians during a bombing run in Nangarhar province, while a separate incident in Nuristan province is alleged by an Afghan officials to have killed 22 civilians.

The high casualty tolls have prompted the International Committee of the Red Cross this week to ask all sides to show restraint and avoid civilian casualties. But violence continued around the country on Sunday.

A suicide bomber on a motorcycle blew himself up next to a police patrol Sunday in the southern province of Uruzgan, killing 24 people.

The bomb attack on a police patrol at a busy intersection of the Deh Rawood district killed five police officers and 19 civilians, wounding more than 30 others, said Juma Gul Himat, Uruzgan's police chief. Most of those killed and wounded were shopkeepers and young boys selling goods in the street, he said.

Elsewhere, Taliban militants executed two women in central Afghanistan late Saturday after accusing them of working as prostitutes on a U.S. base.

The women, dressed in blue burqas, were shot and killed just outside Ghazni city in central Afghanistan, said Sayed Ismal, a spokesman for Ghazni's governor. He called the two "innocent local people."

Taliban fighters told Associated Press Television News the two women were executed for allegedly running a prostitution ring catering to U.S. soldiers and other foreign contractors at a U.S. base in Ghazni city.

1st Lt. Nathan Perry, a U.S. military spokesman, said he had not heard allegations "anything close to that nature."

Meanwhile, at least 40 militants were killed following an attack on Afghan and U.S.-led coalition forces in Helmand province, the coalition said in a statement.

The militants attacked the combined forces near Sangin on Saturday from "multiple concealed and fortified positions," the coalition said. Thirty "enemy boats" and several small bridges have been destroyed on the Helmand River during two days of fighting, it said.

A soldier with NATO's International Security Assistance Force died in a roadside blast in Helmand province Sunday, a statement said. The soldier's nationality was not released and it wasn't clear if the death was connected to the two-day battle.

More than 2,300 people - mostly militants - have died in insurgency related violence this year, according to an Associated Press tally of official figures.

In the country's north, a soldier serving with ISAF died of wounds caused by an explosion Saturday, the military alliance said in a statement. The statement did not give any further details of the explosion. The soldier's nationality was not been disclosed.

There are nearly 53,000 troops from 40 nations serving the ISAF in Afghanistan.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,517
212
63
Bowling Green Ky
Funny thing is -thought the liberals were for Afgan war--

Spy- is this a sign that you and liberals have conceded on the fact public opinion has turned on you over war in iraq and exposed you as weak on terror- white flag wavers--

not much else to say after -their in a civil war-we can't win-we already lost-surge won't work--and other collosal gaffs--

Appears your only option is sneak off to another war--
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,587
234
63
"the bunker"
no,dtb...the focus is "dead americans".....

the idea is to weaken american resolve by spamming as many forums as possible....

`m sure spy is responsible for his "territory"....and other "retired military"(lol)are responsible for other forums......

it`s like each one has his own little clientele...

spy`s handlers give the orders to the stw`s of the internet.....and he influences the weak minded cut and paste drones.....

they invent nothing...they provide nothing but misery.........but they`re excellent at utilizing every else`s technology to suit their own agendas....

thankfully,theres not as much misery to report on in iraq....beginning to look like they may have lost the war for hearts and minds in iraq as the people have become sick of al qaeda and al sadr(who is bravely waging the fight from iran) and the misery they bring...

so,they`re shifting their focus toward afghanistan...

which,if you think about it,is an incredible victory....

afghanistan is possibly the most desolate,backward country on the face of the earth...

while iraq is a geopolitical strategic plum....given their location,the oil and their potential to become a moderate,arab ally.....

instead of being a continuing,festering,unpredictable sore as they were under saddam...

and what also makes it preferrable is the fact that pakistan`s new governmant is beginning to put the screws to the jihadis along their border territories....

it`s a tough slog,but,the taliban have their plates full in their own backyard...makes it less likely that they will have the time and wherewithal to try and attack us here...
 
Last edited:

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
no,dtb...the focus is "dead americans".....

the idea is to weaken american resolve by spamming as many forums as possible....

`m sure spy is responsible for his "territory"....and other "retired military"(lol)are responsible for other forums......

it`s like each one has his own little clientele...

spy`s handlers give the orders to the stw`s of the internet.....and he influences the weak minded cut and paste drones.....

they invent nothing...they provide nothing but misery.........but they`re excellent at utilizing every else`s technology to suit their own agendas....

thankfully,theres not as much misery to report on in iraq....beginning to look like they may have lost the war for hearts and minds in iraq as the people have become sick of al qaeda and al sadr(who is bravely waging the fight from iran) and the misery they bring...

so,they`re shifting their focus toward afghanistan...

which,if you think about it,is an incredible victory....

afghanistan is possibly the most desolate,backward country on the face of the earth...

while iraq is a geopolitical strategic plum....given their location,the oil and their potential to become a moderate,arab ally.....

instead of being a continuing,festering,unpredictable sore as they were under saddam...

and what also makes it preferrable is the fact that pakistan`s new governmant is beginning to put the screws to the jihadis along their border territories....

it`s a tough slog,but,the taliban have their plates full in their own backyard...makes it less likely that they will have the time and wherewithal to try and attack us here...

Funny but I think you and the Pro Iraq guys get there marching orders from some secret site! Anyway, It looks like the DEMS are right and we should be pulling out of Iraq soon. I like the way the threat of a timetable got Iragi's moving. As you know we can't stay there for 100 years. Now, as for Afgan, if we kept our eye focused on the enemy there instead of being distracted by Iraq we would be in a much stronger position there than now.
I am just happy that all of the timetable talk has seemed to be the firecracker needed to get the Iraqi's off their a$$es.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top