90% Public money on Carolina
- Thread starter 128bit
- Start date
Don't like that number and I can break it down and point it towards Carolina but in the end I'll ride with Vegas over my logic cause logic doesn't win $$$$$
LOL read this if you think Broncos lose game and hang within points
2. Turnover Ratio. Forty-one of the 47 Super Bowl champs had a positive turnover ratio; 21 of the 47 had a +10 or more turnover ratio in the regular season. While the Broncos turnover differential was 0, the Seahawks led the NFL with a +20 turnover ratio.
Broncos finshed at NEGTIVE To's Panthers Finsihed at PLUS 21 baby
last time we had this happen it broncos who finshed at Flat zero 0 Seahwks were Plus 21 in to's In that superbowl whyat was that final score ?
ooooooooyeah wait 43-8 lol
I cant wait until the bowl is on i will relish every minute of old aged busted up noddle arm manning getting hammered again..
That Panthers offense alone proved through two playoff wins they can beat top ranked defenses Broncos squeaked by both hurt playoff teams steelers and patriots
2. Turnover Ratio. Forty-one of the 47 Super Bowl champs had a positive turnover ratio; 21 of the 47 had a +10 or more turnover ratio in the regular season. While the Broncos turnover differential was 0, the Seahawks led the NFL with a +20 turnover ratio.
Broncos finshed at NEGTIVE To's Panthers Finsihed at PLUS 21 baby
last time we had this happen it broncos who finshed at Flat zero 0 Seahwks were Plus 21 in to's In that superbowl whyat was that final score ?
ooooooooyeah wait 43-8 lol
I cant wait until the bowl is on i will relish every minute of old aged busted up noddle arm manning getting hammered again..
That Panthers offense alone proved through two playoff wins they can beat top ranked defenses Broncos squeaked by both hurt playoff teams steelers and patriots
- Mar 19, 2006
- 38,640
- 557
- 113
- 75
13-5 ATS
why would anyone bet into that..
really ...but they can be had OTR....:mj07:
DROPPING 35 on whoever shows up and the road is going to take away their MoJo.
ain't a snowballs chance in hell...Denver going to post a 30 spot w/dink and dunk and 35 carries for 80 yards..
it's one game...season over..have a nice winter..
why would anyone bet into that..
really ...but they can be had OTR....:mj07:
DROPPING 35 on whoever shows up and the road is going to take away their MoJo.
ain't a snowballs chance in hell...Denver going to post a 30 spot w/dink and dunk and 35 carries for 80 yards..
it's one game...season over..have a nice winter..
to differntial is huge
negative number vs a postive number add together to get differnce bewteen two teams or points on a straight zero line scale
heres what it looks like
Denver -4 - - - -0- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Panthers +21
byieeeeeeeeee denver Panthers win by making Deners D stay on filed with 4 minute to 6 minute drives wearing them down final scores i have are
Panthers 35 denver 14 or 17 Panthers 28- denver 9 Panthers 49 or 53 denver 21
- Apr 10, 2015
- 2,443
- 56
- 0
Denver Def will not give up that absurd amount of points.
This game will be more like both teams barely cracking the 20's
Just like Denver vs New England afc championship game where the score was
Denver 20
New England 18
This site shows 82% of money on Carolina.
https://www.sportsinsights.com/free-nfl-odds/
Not sure how accurate that is.
https://www.sportsinsights.com/free-nfl-odds/
Not sure how accurate that is.
- Mar 19, 2006
- 38,640
- 557
- 113
- 75
SIA
[h=2]Customers who gave their opinion predict the winning result will be[/h]
[h=2]Sports Interaction customers are placing their bets on:[/h]
[h=2]Customers who gave their opinion predict the winning result will be[/h]
- Carolina -5
- Denver +5
- 86%
- 14%
0%
50%
100%
[h=2]Sports Interaction customers are placing their bets on:[/h]
- Carolina -5
- Denver +5
- 82%
- 18%
0%
50%
100%
- Mar 19, 2006
- 38,640
- 557
- 113
- 75
[h=2]Customers who gave their opinion predict the winning result will be[/h]
[h=2]Sports Interaction customers are placing their bets on:[/h]
- Carolina -6
- Denver +6
- 91%
- 9%
0%
50%
100%
[h=2]Sports Interaction customers are placing their bets on:[/h]
- Carolina -6
- Denver +6
- 79%
- 21%
a question...
when we put so much emphasis on what "the public wants/plays",aren`t we admitting that many gamblers believe that the whole shooting match is fixed in some way?...why else would such a statistic mean jack- shit?.... we all would agree that logically,carolina has been the far better,more consisitent team all year long...manning looks lost out there much of the time(his qb rating is just north of eddie Arcaro`s boot size).....the entire afc has been decimated by injury and was a bit of a joke this year....
always wondered what the actual logic behind bucking the public was?(unless the books need the other side and have some way of shading the outcome)........you hear quite a bit about momentum,but,nobody`s been hotter than cam and Carolina....
we hear this contrarian anti-logic all the time on gambling forums....why?...what`s the logical explanantion?
I have been betting football for over 30 years and I do not get the whole "public money" thing. Can you really trust the sites your going on for accurate numbers? There are so many sports books that it makes my head spin thinking about trying to be on the Sharp's side of a play. For me, I like who I like and do not give a shit if it is deemed a public play or not. Both sides win games, does it really matter? And if it was that easy betting on the other side of the public......the books would get there ass handed to them weekly and that's not happening. :0008
The Sportsbooks have no frickin' idea who's gonna win this game, they never do! That's the whole idea of a point-spread. The fact that most of the wagers are on one side in this case, only means they came out with the number too low. The linemaker will adjust the line to try and attract money on the other side, but rarely if ever, will they move the line more than a couple of points. They sure as hell don't want to get middled like they did in Super Bowl XIII.
