- Mar 19, 2006
- 38,645
- 557
- 113
- 75
Line at my book is still 4 :shrug:
and what does that 4 cost ya.
it ain't -110
probably -130
:0corn
Line at my book is still 4 :shrug:
and what does that 4 cost ya.
it ain't -110
probably -130
:0corn
a question...
when we put so much emphasis on what "the public wants/plays",aren`t we admitting that many gamblers believe that the whole shooting match is fixed in some way?...why else would such a statistic mean jack- shit?.... we all would agree that logically,carolina has been the far better,more consisitent team all year long...manning looks lost out there much of the time(his qb rating is just north of eddie Arcaro`s boot size).....the entire afc has been decimated by injury and was a bit of a joke this year....
always wondered what the actual logic behind bucking the public was?(unless the books need the other side and have some way of shading the outcome)........you hear quite a bit about momentum,but,nobody`s been hotter than cam and Carolina....
we hear this contrarian anti-logic all the time on gambling forums....why?...what`s the logical explanantion?
i appreciate the responses...but I don`t think I got a logical answer as to why people worry about public percentages on a game...
why worry about what vegas "needs' if vegas has no actual bearing on what happens in a game?
to differntial is huge
negative number vs a postive number add together to get differnce bewteen two teams or points on a straight zero line scale
heres what it looks like
Denver -4 - - - -0- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Panthers +21
byieeeeeeeeee denver Panthers win by making Deners D stay on filed with 4 minute to 6 minute drives wearing them down final scores i have are
Panthers 35 denver 14 or 17 Panthers 28- denver 9 Panthers 49 or 53 denver 21
Great Post.Hell, I've been asking this for years "and just who is the public?" and have never received an answer of any sort.
People around here use the term all the time. It's like they think they are somehow on a higher plane than others because they post on a sports gambling forum or maybe they gamble a few more dollars than the average Joe.
For the record, I don't buy into the notion that books release sensitive and accurate information that could potentially damage them. There is absolutely no advantage to be gained by them by doing so. I don't buy into any of it.
It's got to the point that there are very few of us that cap games the old fashioned way any more. I think that all the hoopla surrounding any given game is more scrutinized than the match up itself. I'd be willing to bet that 75% of the guys that post in the college hoops forum could name 3 starters on any team they wager on.
We are all the public
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.
