A bit more mind-boggling...

Sun Tzu

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 10, 2003
6,197
9
0
Houston, Texas
Texas -3 v OU is the early line.

OU talent down, but I just cant imagine the public allowing a line like that to stand. Kind of like the Ohio State line, it reeks so bad you have to think Texas is the play, then you think about it some more.....
 

Mr Hockey

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 17, 2003
2,098
0
0
Texas is overhyped more then usual coming into this year as well as the way OU ended the season last year & the talent supposedly being down this year for the Sonners. This line looks about right on perception. I'd play Oklahoma with confidence.
 

SALTY DOG

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 3, 2003
370
2
0
71
19th hole
This is the year that not having the Stoops Bros.
together really shows...Bob got buy with it last
year until the NC game...it will show even more
this year...look how the two teams finished the
season...Texas was on fire in their bowl game
and OU looked like a bunch of lost souls searching
for Prep H to ease the pain...this is the year, and
if you go back in the history of OU/Texas games...
you will see the tide turns...the tide will turn this
year...and a warning for the Homer of all Homers
Scott4rubbers...Chow's leaving is the equalivent
of the Stoop's Bros. splitting up...and you better
watch out for the Stoop's in YOUR conference...
by the way, did anyone listen to the HERD on
ESPN radio the last two days...he is a west coast
guy who just pummeled the pac-10 fans for
wanting more respect...compared all other pac-10
except USC to the Mountain West and said if USC
played in the SEC, Big 12, Big 10, Acc, would not
have the cake walk they do now... :mj07:
 

Coug LJ

Registered User
Forum Member
May 16, 2005
109
0
0
It is very hard to believe in Texas until they have a better performance in big games. Oklahoma loses a lot, but Texas lost major talent as well. Texas is always rated highly in pre-season polls. Their ranking usually goes down once the season starts.

I am a fan of Washington State and a Pac-10 fan. I think the league will be better this year. True, USC is the only Top Ten team, but most of the other teams in the league are pretty solid. In my opinion, that is the strength of the conference. No Vanderbildts or Kentuckys. Historically, it has been very, very hard for a Pac-10 team to go through the conference undefeated.

There was a lot of hype surrounding Mike Stoops and he did not fare well in conference play. The Offenses are more sophisticated than other conferences, more pro-style passing. It will be interesting to see how Arizona does this year.

I agree that the loss of Norm Chow could impact USC greatly. This year the Trojans are so loaded it may not matter, but the guy has had tremendous results. It was a great day for fans of other Pac-10 teams when Norm Chow left USC.
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
SALTY DOG said:
and a warning for the Homer of all Homers
Scott4rubbers...Chow's leaving is the equalivent
of the Stoop's Bros. splitting up...and you better
watch out for the Stoop's in YOUR conference...

Something you might not know is the Carroll was not going to have Chow as OC whether he stayed or left. Chow sorta was run out by Carroll.

1st year at USC Chow's offense did not work in the Pac 10. That summer, Carroll sat with Chow and revised "Chow's" offense. Most people don't know that and most don't know how involved Carroll was with the USC offense. In practices Carroll spent a lot of time with USC offense.

This year, USC will have 3 OC's. Carroll, Kiffin (WR COACH), and Sarkisian (QB Coach)

Sarkisian was USC QB coach for 2-3 years and 1 year in NFL as coach. He played under Norm Chow and knows Chows offense very well.

Kiffin sat in booth on gamedays with Chow and learned under him for 3+ years. So he is very well equipped.

According to Carroll, he feels Sarkisian and Kiffin are 2 of brightest young coaches in the country and he wanted to promote them before they left. He wanted Chow to stay and just watch over them this year. Chow felt like he was not wanted and left.

With USC's talent and experienced Matt Leinart returning, this is the best year to start new at the OC position because there is a lot of room for error. Much better USC has new OC's this year vs next year (where CHow def. be coaching a college team) Next year USC will have a lot of new faces on offense starting at QB!

Best to start transition now vs next season.

Carroll is very smart and realized this and is clear cut sign Carroll is here to stay at USC for long haul.

Stoops at Arizona is kicking butt. Great recruiter and he will have Arizona contending for Pac 10 championships. Remember, he had Arizona compete against USC for 1st haf @USC, something his big brother couldn't do.

Stoops was quoted during season last year saying while he was at OU and in Big 12 he did not have much respect for Pac 10. Then he went on to say he was wrong and he felt Pac 10 was as good as Big 12.

Coug LJ said:
I am a fan of Washington State and a Pac-10 fan. I think the league will be better this year. True, USC is the only Top Ten team, but most of the other teams in the league are pretty solid. In my opinion, that is the strength of the conference. No Vanderbildts or Kentuckys. Historically, it has been very, very hard for a Pac-10 team to go through the conference undefeated. .

:clap: :clap: :clap:
 

Coug LJ

Registered User
Forum Member
May 16, 2005
109
0
0
So, Scott, Norm Chow wasn't all that good, after all? For the past three or four years we have been hearing, from mostly USC fans, what a genius Norm Chow was and now we you're giving us the real story. He was really just figurehead, huh?

I, for one, had bought into the hype. I remember when USC was a bad football team. Carson Palmer was the quarterback and he was by all accounts a bust. Then Pete Carroll and Norm Chow showed up.

Now, everyone knows what a great coach Pete Carroll is. He is super with the media, recruits better than anyone else and is a great motivator. He is also in charge of the Defense. You are now telling us he was also the brains behind the Offense.

Norm Chow had a pretty good track record. He was the quarterback guru of all those great Brigham Young quarterbacks and most recently Phillip Rivers at North Carolina State. Carson Palmer, if I remember correctly, praised Norm Chow highly for his unlikely rise from bust to Heisman Trophy. ...As did Matt Leinart.

It was just a couple of seasons ago that college football wondered how USC was going to replace Carson Palmer. What we were hearing from USC fans until very recently was that Norm Chow did a marvelous job with Matt Leinart and the Offense and turned the untested QB into a Heisman Trophy winner as well.

Whoever has been in charge of the USC Offense has done a fantastic job the last three seasons. The USC Defense has been fine, but as a fan from the outside, I have been really impressed with the Offense - especially, the transition from Palmer to Leinart and with the unexpected loss of Mike Williams. Like I said, until a few months ago, the word from L.A. was that it was mostly due to Norm Chow.

Well, Pete Carroll won't have Norm Chow around to muck up the works, anymore. We will all have an opportunity to see Pete Carroll unfettered. The cupboard is far from bare, so he should not have a problem. If I had any advice for Pete it would be to not lose a game. Go undefeated and everything should be fine.

...On a side note, what's the word with USC players leaving the program? My USC sources were very high on Eric Wright. Isn't he the second projected defensive starter to leave the program in the last month? ...And what about LenDale White? You guys are loaded, but is there any concern about recent developments?
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
Good post Coug LJ

Coug LJ said:
So, Scott, Norm Chow wasn't all that good, after all? For the past three or four years we have been hearing, from mostly USC fans, what a genius Norm Chow was and now we you're giving us the real story. He was really just figurehead, huh??

NO. You took my post the wrong way. Norm Chow was great OC, #1 in country. BUt the USC offense was not ALL NORM CHOW. Pete Carroll is the DC for USC and defensive minded coach. People, media, gameday announcers assume that Carroll had nothing to do with offense and let Chow control it. Giving Chow all the credit. Simply not true.

Carroll works with USC offense in practice and gameplans with both defensive coaches and offensive coaches. He was involved with everything. Carrroll puts in 15 hour workdays during the season and leaves office at 10pm. The guy loves to work and never gets tired. Also explains why he is great recruiter. After the 1st year, Carroll and Chow along with other assistants modified Chows offense that he ran at BYU. It wasn't working at USC and Pac 10.

Chow will be missed on gamedays. Chow would run specific and conservative plays in 1h to see how the defense plays USC. Then USC would make the adjustments at halftime. USC did not want to make adjustments in 1h because they didn't want to give the opposing team a chance to adjust to USC. That is why USC dominated opponents in 2h along with being better conditioned team. Carroll did same thing on defense. USC never showed there card in the 1h. They didn't want the opposing team to be able to make adjustments against them at halftime.

Chow will be missed on gamedays because if USC needed the right play at crucial moment, Chow new exactly how a defense would defend USC in 2h and would call a play to counter that. The new OC's learned from Chow but there will be mistakes all season long. But USC has the talent this year on offense and experience (Leianrt) to get by with the new OC's mistakes.


I, for one, had bought into the hype. I remember when USC was a bad football team. Carson Palmer was the quarterback and he was by all accounts a bust. Then Pete Carroll and Norm Chow showed up.

Palmer had more talent than Leinart. Palmer never had Mike Williams at WR, an OL that protected him or RB's. Leinart has studs surrounding him while Palmer had DUDS along with horrible coach in Hacket. Leinart is better QB because he checks off and reads defenses better but Palmer would have similar success. Palmer had to learn Chow's offense on the job and Palmer finally had superstar talent around him in his last year. That talent was nowhere near what Leinart had.

Now, everyone knows what a great coach Pete Carroll is. He is super with the media, recruits better than anyone else and is a great motivator. He is also in charge of the Defense. You are now telling us he was also the brains behind the Offense.

Carroll was very involved with the offense!

Norm Chow had a pretty good track record. He was the quarterback guru of all those great Brigham Young quarterbacks and most recently Phillip Rivers at North Carolina State. Carson Palmer, if I remember correctly, praised Norm Chow highly for his unlikely rise from bust to Heisman Trophy. ...As did Matt Leinart.

Chow is great coach and QB developer. Track record speaks for itself. Palmer was a 4-star high school recruit and Leinart was a 4-star high school recruit. So both had talent etc. More impressed with what CHow did for Leinart vs Palmer because Leinart does not have as much physical talent. Sarkisian also played roe in developing both QB's as he was the QB coach and still is!

Now USC has Booty 5-star recruit and Sanchez 5-star recruit, and Hinds 4-star recruit as backup QB's. Both Booty and Sanchez were #1 QB's in country coming out of high school and are phenoms. Most college football teams have only have one 4-star QB on there team. USC has two 5-star QB's. Basically what I am saying is USC is set at QB for LONG time.

Chow earned his money last year where USC had no returning starters on OL and WR. Quite amazing. This year it was time for Chow to move on because Carroll was tired of him interviewing for jobs while coaching at USC. Week against UCLA Chow was out interviewing and if USC beat UCLA they would be in OB. Huge distraction.

...On a side note, what's the word with USC players leaving the program? My USC sources were very high on Eric Wright. Isn't he the second projected defensive starter to leave the program in the last month? ...And what about LenDale White? You guys are loaded, but is there any concern about recent developments?

:cursin: :cursin: :cursin:

USC losing all there big time talent.

Manual Wright who was USC's most talented DT had to leave school because of academics. USC is too high of standards academically. This means USC now lost there 3 best DT's from last year with ZERO returning starters at DT with extensive playing time. Not good! Good news is USC is hoping that the #1 Junior College DT Gabe Long will get accepted into USC and be on team in fall.

Eric Wright who was USC's #1 returning DB. He was a stud and has NFL talent. He was charged with rape, but then courts did not have evidence and charge was dropped. But they found a bag of ecstasy pills in his dorm room but Eric said they were not his. USC told him to leave and he is gone. Guy was never found guilty of anything by law but USC doesn't give 2nd chances like some schools do. USC does have some returning talent at DB so shouldn't hurt too bad.

Whitney Lewis who was #1 WR recruit out of high school 2 years ago has not played because of academics. If he passes his summer school he will be playing and signs are pointing he will. He was USC's best WR out of spring practice last year before he was ruled ineligible. Put him next to Dwane Jarret along with Steve Smith and nobody is defending USC WR's. No team's 3rd best DB can defend Whitney Lewis. USC also could put 4 WR's at once with freshman Patric Turner who is 6.6 and a Mike Williams clone. He was #1 high school WR in country last year and Mike Williams says this kid will be better than he was at USC.

Lendale White and Dominic Byrd both sat out spring practice to focus on academics and both will be playing in fall. No trouble with either player. :) Byrd IMO is best TE in country and White is a top 3 RB in country.
 

dr. freeze

BIG12 KING
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2001
7,170
8
0
Mansion
Oklahoma Offensive Line looked worse than Baylor at the Spring game...and so did Bomar

they put up 13 points last year with not much other than Johnson leaving

add to that OU has 7 starters on D gone and Young should get enough points to win this one by 2-3 scores i dont care what Coach Mack does

OU should be good again in ' 06
 

Coug LJ

Registered User
Forum Member
May 16, 2005
109
0
0
NO. You took my post the wrong way. Norm Chow was great OC, #1 in country. BUt the USC offense was not ALL NORM CHOW. Pete Carroll is the DC for USC and defensive minded coach. People, media, gameday announcers assume that Carroll had nothing to do with offense and let Chow control it. Giving Chow all the credit. Simply not true.

The impression I have gotten from SC fans is that Chow was not all he was cracked up to be ...of course, this was only AFTER he left the program. Like I said, the rest of us in the Pac-10 are euphoric he has left Troy.

After the 1st year, Carroll and Chow along with other assistants modified Chows offense that he ran at BYU. It wasn't working at USC and Pac 10.

My guess is that Chow had more talent at USC, especially in the backfield. Whatever the kinks, it has been ironed out the last three years.

Chow will be missed on gamedays. Chow would run specific and conservative plays in 1h to see how the defense plays USC. Then USC would make the adjustments at halftime. USC did not want to make adjustments in 1h because they didn't want to give the opposing team a chance to adjust to USC. That is why USC dominated opponents in 2h along with being better conditioned team. Carroll did same thing on defense. USC never showed there card in the 1h. They didn't want the opposing team to be able to make adjustments against them at halftime.

USC is legendary for it's 2nd half adjustments. Often times, it is superior talent overwhelming the opposition, but you have to give SC coaches credit. The results speak for themselves. As I mentioned in my last post, one loss and people are going to wonder what would have happened if Norm Chow was around.

Chow is great coach and QB developer. Track record speaks for itself. Palmer was a 4-star high school recruit and Leinart was a 4-star high school recruit. So both had talent etc. More impressed with what CHow did for Leinart vs Palmer because Leinart does not have as much physical talent. Sarkisian also played roe in developing both QB's as he was the QB coach and still is!

Now USC has Booty 5-star recruit and Sanchez 5-star recruit, and Hinds 4-star recruit as backup QB's. Both Booty and Sanchez were #1 QB's in country coming out of high school and are phenoms. Most college football teams have only have one 4-star QB on there team. USC has two 5-star QB's. Basically what I am saying is USC is set at QB for LONG time.

No one recruits better than Carroll and USC, but you cannot expect to have Heisman winning quarterbacks every year. I heard Chow loved Booty and Sanchez looks like the real thing as well. I hear Hinds is thinking of leaving. Time will tell.


Chow earned his money last year where USC had no returning starters on OL and WR. Quite amazing.

Yeah. I thought you guys would be in trouble when Williams was declared ineligible and with a green offensive line. As you say, Chow did a great job.


Manual Wright who was USC's most talented DT had to leave school because of academics. USC is too high of standards academically. This means USC now lost there 3 best DT's from last year with ZERO returning starters at DT with extensive playing time. Not good! Good news is USC is hoping that the #1 Junior College DT Gabe Long will get accepted into USC and be on team in fall.

I think the most underrated aspect of USC success has been it's defensive line. The have been so good USC doesn't have to blitz and they wear out most any offensive line. SC has had a number of 1st round NFL draft picks from their defensive line. It is going to be hard to equal last year's performance and it will be interesting to see how that effects the overall defensive performance.

You guys are more stacked at DB, but Wright seemed to be very talented. White sounds like he'll return, but I am always nervous until they are green-lighted. LenDale White is a load.


As for Oklahoma, they are a lot like USC - they always recruit blue-chippers. I would be surprised if Texas beat them, let alone by a couple of touchdowns. People went gaga over Vince Young's performance against Michigan in the Rose Bowl. A freshman quarterback from Ohio State basically did the same thing a month earlier.
 

flapjack

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 13, 2004
1,244
7
0
Stoops vs Brown? Yeah, I'll take the 3 pts. Michigan put on one of the most stunning displays of how not to defend a running QB in the Rose Bowl since, well since they played Ohio St. OU will contain Young, force him to pass and that is where he gets into trouble. Not to mention losing Benson will set that Offense back considerably. I don't personally like OU but they will own UT again unfortunatley IMHO.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top