A good read about advanced stats in Pro Football

DZ

Urban Achiever
Forum Member
Oct 22, 2009
11,819
119
63
310/917
From: WSJ

In Super Bowl, Giants Go Long for a Number Cruncher

Football Novice From England Studies Footage, Supplies Data
By REED ALBERGOTTI

INDIANAPOLIS?A secret strategist for the New York Giants won't be in Indianapolis for Sunday's Super Bowl bout against the New England Patriots. He won't even be in the U.S.

Neil Hornsby will be watching the game on television from his home about 30 miles from London. A north England native, Mr. Hornsby never played a down of football. Not until the age of 42 did he attend his first professional football game. Yet from watching games broadcast over the Internet, he has compiled research and analysis that the Giants and several other teams used this season to prepare for their opponents.

Now, from temporary offices in an Indianapolis Marriott, the Giants are using pieces of Mr. Hornsby's data as they get ready for the Patriots. "It's definitely valuable information," says Jon Berger, the Giants' director of football information, who for competitive reasons declines to elaborate.

Like those train spotters who stand along Britain's railways collecting locomotive data, Mr. Hornsby studies the National Football League in a way its most fanatical fans would find tedious. Using game footage available to anyone with Internet access, Mr. Hornsby and his team watch every player on every down that is broadcast on television, a process of such endless rewinding and replaying that each contest takes about 24 hours to analyze. "I get very little sleep," says Mr. Hornsby, 48 years old.

"I haven't started a support group yet," says his wife, Claire Hornsby, who dubs herself the United Kingdom's only "American football widow."

Mr. Hornsby grew up following his nation's most popular obsession, soccer. But while watching television in 1983, he underwent a road-to-Damascus-type conversion upon seeing some highlights of American football. Rushing out to buy a football magazine that happened to feature Dolphins quarterback Dan Marino on its cover, Mr. Hornsby became an instant Miami fan.

Inside the magazine, however, he discovered what he loves most: statistics. Yards per carry, completion percentage, sacks, fumbles, receptions?all this was candy to a man who held a physics degree and whose business consultancy provided process-and-program-management advice to the hotel industry.

Even so, for many years his only way of following live games was the Armed Forces Radio Network.

"It was so frustrating because the signal was always cutting out right at the crucial moments in the game," he says.

Then came the Internet, delivering game-footage galore. The more Mr. Hornsby watched and took notes, the more convinced he became that existing analysis of the game was neither complete nor entirely accurate. According to his research, hype often played a larger role than statistics in determining pay, playing time and Pro Bowl appearances. "Take everything you hear watching the game on television with a grain of salt," he says.

But in a sport teeming with armchair quarterbacks, who wanted to hear from Luton, England? Mr. Hornsby, after all, had only ever attended two professional games.

Then, in 2007, he launched his website, called Pro Football Focus. At first it made no splash. But gradually football junkies saw it offered unusual detail, including grades of how specific players performed in each game in each facet of the game. For instance, an offensive lineman would receive a separate grade for both pass blocking and run blocking.

Pro Football Focus was also keeping track of even more advanced data, that it hoped to sell to media outlets and, perhaps, football teams.

For a pass play, it didn't merely record who threw it, who caught it and how many yards were gained after completion. It kept track of how many seconds elapsed before the quarterback released the ball, where each player stood at the start of the play, which defensive player applied pressure and which blocker allowed it.

In 2009, the site came to the attention of the Giants' Mr. Berger, an executive of the team since the early 1980s. As director of information, Mr. Berger is the team's official wonk, entering every play by every NFL team into a database in search of trends and tendencies that might be useful for Giants coaches.

It was while "messing around on Google" that Mr. Berger came across Pro Football Focus, and one statistic in particular struck him: player participation. The site listed the number of times each player in the NFL participated in a play during a game. That is a statistic the NFL tracks and releases only to teams?never to the public.

Doubtful about the accuracy of Mr. Hornsby's data, Mr. Berger checked it against the NFL data set and found Pro Football Focus was nearly perfect. Impressed, Mr. Berger sent Mr. Hornsby a congratulatory note. Mr. Hornsby was so surprised he thought one of his friends had pulled a prank on him.

Today, the site provides customized data to five NFL teams, Mr. Hornsby says, as well as to sports agents seeking to bolster their players' arguments for fat paychecks. Mr. Hornsby won't say which teams or agents are paying for his data. But he says revenue is now great enough that he employs four analysts to help him study game footage, and 13 others to count how many downs each NFL athlete plays per game. He says he doesn't provide data to the Patriots.

The Giants are a nonpaying user of the site. That relationship deepened last August when Mr. Hornsby requested a visit with Mr. Berger. The timing could hardly have been worse: With the preseason shortened by a labor dispute, August was busier than usual for Mr. Berger. But he agreed to meet with Mr. Hornsby, blocking out a full hour on his calendar.

The meeting lasted seven hours. Stunned at the material Mr. Hornsby produced from his laptop, Mr. Berger says he was especially intrigued by data showing where individual players most often line up on the field, and how they perform against certain formations and opponents.

"It was really impressive," says Mr. Berger, calling Mr. Hornsby the first outsider ever to supply usable data to the Giants.

What most amazes Mr. Berger is that Mr. Hornsby gathers his data using the television footage available to everyone. That footage is highly limited compared with the proprietary film?known as All 22?that the NFL gathers at each game and makes available only to team officials.

Mr. Berger says it is now customary for him to seek information from Mr. Hornsby about coming opponents. Mr. Berger says these communications typically begin with an email to Mr. Hornsby asking him to call Giants headquarters. That is because the teams' low-cost telephone system won't allow calls to England.

Write to Reed Albergotti at reed.albergotti@wsj.com
 

DZ

Urban Achiever
Forum Member
Oct 22, 2009
11,819
119
63
310/917
Who stands out in a wide-open NFL playoff field? Eric Edholm and Michael Salfino provide the real story on how to beat the teams still standing. Click on each team?s helmet for a scouting report and a graphed presentation of their 2011 seasons in the Massey-Peabody index.



New England Patriots (13-3)
Final Massey-Peabody Ranking: 4th
The Patriots played only one negative game all season ? a 24-20 loss at home Week 9 to the Giants. New England faced one other playoff team, Pittsburgh, and lost that one, too ? 25-17. Ominously, two of their worst three games came in the season?s final three weeks (both wins). The Patriots had two great efforts ? Week 1 against the Dolphins and Week 12 against the Eagles. Both of those games were road contests. As the AFC?s top seed, they will play all conference playoff games at home, where they have lost in the divisional round two straight seasons, to the Ravens and Jets.

OFFENSE
The Patriots mix and match personnel, formations and tempo as well as any team in the NFL, and they attack horizontally as well as they do vertically. Having a stable of versatile running backs and two of the best pass-catching tight ends make them a real chore to match up against. Tom Brady is a master of checking down and going through his progressions. On any given day, Rob Gronkowski, Wes Welker, Aaron Hernandez or Deion Branch could be the go-to receiver. Slow starts have been a bit of a problem this season, and the offensive line has been forced to move a lot of pieces around. There is good depth up front, but several of the group?s stalwarts ? Logan Mankins and Matt Light included ? are playing hurt. Brady throws often early to get into a rhythm, and the team will turn to its running game to salt away victories in the fourth quarter. The four-minute offense has been better with rookie Shane Ridley adding some punch.

DEFENSE
The Patriots primarily have vacillated between 4-3 and 3-4 defenses this season, with varying levels of success. Their rankings in terms of yards allowed, third-down efficiency and sacks are way substandard for a Bill Belichick-coached team, but the bottom line is that they have thrived on creating turnovers and playing decent red-zone defense. Immoveable nose tackle Vince Wilfork anchors the run defense, with tackle machine Jerod Mayo having a fine season behind him. The pass rush took a hit when defensive end Andre Carter was lost for the season, but since then the Patriots have shown more of a willingness to blitz their linebackers to create pressure, something they did not do as much early on. All season long, the secondary has been a nightmare and the healthy return of safety Patrick Chung is not a cure-all. He?s a good box tackler, but the team has struggled to defend the deep halves with shaky safety play.

HOW TO BEAT
Multiple blitz looks have confounded the Patriots at times. With all the personnel changes on the line, some of the communication has suffered up front. Brady has seen more man defense this season, and the lack of a true burner at wide receiver has allowed teams to play a single-high safety against them. Defensively, the Patriots appear ripe for the picking. They scheme well, but the talent just isn?t there. The primary coverage they use is a cover-2 zone, and many teams have carved that up with short and medium passes. Teams that don?t kill themselves with turnovers, have a sound pass rush and can throw the football efficiently have an excellent chance of taking down the Patriots, even in Foxborough, where they have lost their past two playoff games.
 

DZ

Urban Achiever
Forum Member
Oct 22, 2009
11,819
119
63
310/917
New York Giants (9-7)
Final Massey-Peabody Ranking: 18th
They played below league average in eight of their 16 games, third-worst behind the Broncos (12) and Bengals (9). New York?s high-water mark occurred in a Week 13 home loss to the Packers, 38-35. Shockingly, they weren?t even close to league best in a 31-14 win against the Cowboys on Week 17. Ditto their Week 9 win at New England. Big Blue?s worst effort of the season was in Week 15?s 23-10 loss to the lowly (24th-ranked) Redskins.

OFFENSE
Eli Manning has had one of his finest seasons, and his fourth-quarter prowess has kept the Giants in most games. The other huge reason the Giants won the NFC East? The shocking development of WR Victor Cruz, an undrafted free agent from 2010 who was almost cut by the team. Cruz has become the team?s big-play passing threat (five plays of 65 yards or longer), showing impressive quickness and competitiveness, lining up outside and in the slot. He and Hakeem Nicks are as dangerous a one-two receiver punch as there is in the playoffs. The Giants have shuffled their offensive line and have not been as physically imposing up front as in years past. Although the unit has kept Manning from taking a lot of sacks, the run game ranks as the worst in the NFL in yards per carry. The return to health of Ahmad Bradshaw gives the Giants a second tough runner to pair with Brandon Jacobs, and they are just now showing some explosion in their running. Offensive coordinator Kevin Gilbride loves to play-action pass, but that has been limited somewhat by the muted run game.

DEFENSE
Perry Fewell has come under fire for his unit?s disappointing results (27th in yards allowed, 25th in points), but he has overseen the development of defensive end Jason Pierre-Paul into a star. Pierre-Paul has gone from one-trick pass rusher as a rookie to a havoc-wreaking all-around player in Year Two, capable of lining up inside or outside (or even rushing from a two-point stance) and wrecking opposing blocking schemes. Pierre-Paul hasn?t always had a lot of help, although the front four is beginning to step up. Ends Osi Umenyiora and Justin Tuck are getting healthier, and tackles Chris Canty and Linval Joseph are asserting themselves more. Linebackers Mathias Kiwanuka and Michael Boley also are making more impact plays now than earlier in the season. Fewell runs a lot of two-deep coverages, and they often operate out of the team?s ?big nickel? formations, which use three safeties on the field, to match up with good passing teams, especially those that feature quality pass-catching tight ends. Big plays allowed continue to be a bugaboo, and the depth at cornerback is a concern.

HOW TO BEAT
Although Manning has been mostly great this season, he always has been prone to poor throws off his back foot, so look for teams to pressure up the middle. The offensive-line changes have led to some miscommunications up front and allowed some inside pressures to throw off Manning?s timing and footwork. The lack of a consistent running game puts a lot of pressure on Manning and his two key passing targets to do all the heavy lifting. Defensively, they have been too reliant on Pierre-Paul bailing them out with big plays. With Tuck and Umenyiora battling through injuries, the Giants? pressure can be uneven. As quarterbacks become comfortable in the pocket against the Giants, they can really pick apart a sometimes generous secondary in terms of coverage. Fewell has a lot of defensive wrinkles and has outsmarted himself at times, and simple, straight-ahead offensive teams have exploited them.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top