A little trip down memory lane ~

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,771
1,045
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
Here's a memory that got little press.

Rubin, Rubin

The sainted former treasury secretary makes a sleazy phone call, and nobody cares.

By Timothy Noah|Posted Monday, Jan. 14, 2002, at 5:20 PM ET
<!-- ARTICLE BODY -->
26_020114_ruobertrubin.jpg
Robert Rubin



Reporters rustling furiously through the story of Enron's demise in search of a political scandal seem determined not to find one in former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin's Nov. 8 phone call to Treasury Undersecretary Peter Fisher. Rubin asked Fisher, a fellow Democrat, what he thought about having Treasury intervene to avoid a downgrading of Enron's debt rating. Rubin is chairman of the executive committee at Citigroup, which happens to be one of Enron's biggest creditors. Because Fisher told Rubin he thought Treasury intervention a bad idea, the media herd concluded that you couldn't nail the Bush administration for any ethical infractions and moved on. But wait! What about impropriety by a former member of the Clinton administration? Rubin was trying to use his access to the Treasury Department to bring financial benefit to his employer, and, thereby, himself. Isn't that ? unethical?



Advertisement
<SCRIPT language=javascript type=text/javascript>placeAd2(commercialNode,'midarticleflex',false,'')</SCRIPT><SCRIPT type=text/javascript src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/slate.news/chatterbox;sz=446x33,300x250;pos=midarticleflex;poe=yes;ad=bb;ad=fb;del=js;pageId=2060712;u=o*27ED0A6A850110C4,6000010F202E2BD7,,,article,abc;front=n;wapo300=1;wapo728=1;page=article;articleId=rubin_rubin;tile=2;ord=541781376752498370?"></SCRIPT><!-- Template Id = 4,228 Template Name = HTML Image Banner + Optional Additional Tracking - [DFA] --> <SCRIPT type=text/javascript src="http://c.betrad.com/surly.js?;ad_wxh=300x250;coid=273;nid=7583;"></SCRIPT><SCRIPT id=script_494903397261 language=javascript type=text/javascript src="http://cdn.doubleverify.com/script26.js?agnc=422775&cmp=6114634&crt=&crtname=&adnet=&dvtagver=3.3.1346.2176&adsrv=1&plc=83561218&advid=1297440&sid=379941&adid="></SCRIPT>
i
<SCRIPT>(function(){if(d.getElementById('ba.js'))return;d.write('<sc'+'ript id="ba.js" type="text/javascript" src="http://c.betrad.com/geo/ba.js"></scr'+'ipt>');})();</SCRIPT><SCRIPT id=ba.js type=text/javascript src="http://c.betrad.com/geo/ba.js"></SCRIPT><SCRIPT>d.write('<sc'+'ript>try{BAP.start(_bao);}catch(e){var _bab = _bab||[];var ob={}; for (var p in _bao) {ob[p]=_bao[p]}_bab.push(ob);}</sc'+'ript>');</SCRIPT><SCRIPT>try{BAP.start(_bao);}catch(e){var _bab = _bab||[];var ob={}; for (var p in _bao) {ob[p]=_bao[p]}_bab.push(ob);}</SCRIPT>

You wouldn't get that impression from the coverage. The Jan. 14 Wall Street Journal carried a story by Jeanne Cummings and Greg Ip summarizing the weekend's developments on the Washington angle of the Enron story. The first few paragraphs focused on the failure of Commerce Secretary Don Evans, White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card, and Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill to inform President Bush that each of them received she's-gonna-blow phone calls from Enron chairman Kenneth Lay prior to the company's collapse. As Chatterbox noted previously, that's a completely phony issue; it's much easier to argue that it would have been unethical for Cabinet members and White House aides to give Dubya a heads-up. The Journal story didn't get to the genuinely troubling Rubin phone call until the last three paragraphs, and, astonishingly, it left out the crucial information that Citigroup (and therefore Rubin) had a financial stake in Enron. The Times has been burying the Rubin angle, too. The Washington Post's Dana Milbank and Susan Schmidt, to their credit, made Rubin the lead of their Jan. 12 Page One story on political fallout from Enron. But even the Post appears to view Rubin's involvement as a one-day story.



It isn't against the law for Rubin to lobby the Treasury Department (unless the matter concerns something Rubin had direct policymaking involvement in while in government, which doesn't apply here). The legal prohibition on government employees lobbying their old department on any matter lasts only one year, and Rubin left office two and a half years ago. The practice is, however, sufficiently questionable from an ethical standpoint that Bill Clinton signed an executive order in 1993 extending that ban for senior appointees to five years. The only thing that keeps Rubin from being in formal violation of the executive order is the fact that Clinton rather shamelessly revoked it on his way out the door in 2001.



Why is Rubin getting a free pass? Apparently because he's put out the word, through an anonymous intermediary, that he prefaced his remarks to Fisher by saying, "This is probably not a good idea." He was just thinking out loud! But of course, if Rubin really thought it was a bad idea, why was he calling a Treasury official in the first place? In fact, self-effacement can be an excellent strategy for manipulation and/or self-protection. Chatterbox would guess that at least 60 percent of all adulteries begin with somebody saying, "This is probably not a good idea, but why don't we rent a hotel room?"



Some have observed that a government-organized bailout of Enron is just the sort of thing Rubin might have advocated when he was treasury secretary. That's true. But Rubin is in no position, as chairman of Citigroup's executive committee, to portray himself as a disinterested steward of the common good (unless you believe that what's good for Citigroup always coincides with what's good for America). This has been a long-standing problem for Rubin: He's always had difficulty making up his mind whether he wanted to be Jesus Christ or J.P. Morgan. For the most part, a wildly adulatory press has let Rubin have it both ways. One notable exception was an Al Hunt column headlined "A Rare Disappointing Rubin Move" that ran in the Wall Street Journal on Nov. 4, 1999. In it, Hunt criticized Rubin for accepting the Citigroup job on the grounds that it would take valuable time away from Rubin's prior commitment to chair the Local Initiatives Support Corp., a nonprofit community development group that offered Rubin an opportunity to make good on his long-standing claim that he wanted to help people trapped in the inner city. Hunt pointed out that Rubin was already worth several hundred million dollars, so he hardly needed the cash. "I think I can do more for LISC by being at Citigroup," Rubin explained to Hunt, but Hunt, quite rightly, didn't buy it. Sure enough, in August 2000 Christopher Swope reported in Governing magazine that Rubin wasn't raising money for LISC as aggressively as LISC officials had hoped because he was too busy fulfilling his commitment to Citigroup.



Rubin's stewardship of LISC remains, of course, uncompromised in any moral way by his role at Citigroup. It would be hard to argue that anything Rubin did for LISC was aimed at maximizing Citigroup's profits. You can't say the same about Rubin's playing free-lance consultant on the advisability of allowing Enron to suffer the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history. For Rubin, it just wasn't simply a matter of promoting the best policy, and the press isn't doing nearly enough to make that understood.
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,771
1,045
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
Charlie Rangel Scandal: Congressman Could Be 23rd House Member To Be Censured <!-- Large image -->
r-CHARLIE-RANGEL-large570.jpg

LARRY MARGASAK 11/19/10 06:32 AM ET Associated Press
ap_wire.png

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/...al-co_n_785879.html?view=print&comm_ref=false


React
follow-arrow.png


<!-- facebook vote --><SCRIPT type=text/javascript> HPFacebookVoteV2.init(785879, 'Charlie Rangel Scandal: Congressman Could Be 23rd House Member To Be Censured', 'WASHINGTON ? One of Congress\\\' most likable veterans, Rep. Charles Rangel, would become the 23rd House member in the nation\\\'s history to be censured if the House goes along with a recommendation of its ethics committee. After Thanksgiving, House members will take up the solemn task of disciplining one of their own when the New York Democrat is reproached for financial and fundraising misconduct.', 'http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/19/charlie-rangel-scandal-co_n_785879.html', 'http://i.huffpost.com/gen/219030/thumbs/s-CHARLIE-RANGEL-small.jpg', 'Please join me at <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/">Huffington Post</a>!', 'news', ["Amazing","Inspiring","Funny","Scary","Hot","Crazy","Important","Weird"]); </SCRIPT>Amazing
Inspiring
Funny
Scary
Hot
Crazy
Important
Weird


Read more
follow-arrow.png


Charlie Rangel , Charlie Rangel Ethics Violations , Rep. Charlie Rangel , Charlie Rangel Charges , Charlie Rangel Ethics , Charlie Rangel Ethics Probe , Charlie Rangel Ethics Trial , Charlie Rangel Scandal , New York News<!-- There were Verticals -->


<STYLE>#news_entries #ad_sharebox_260x60 img {padding:0px;margin:0px}</STYLE><SCRIPT type=text/javascript> if(HPAds.ad_check_page_config('sharebox_260x60')) { var adId = '93315220'; htmlAdWH(adId, "260", "60","f"); var debugadcode = ''; document.write(debugadcode); } </SCRIPT><IFRAME style="WIDTH: 0px; DISPLAY: none; HEIGHT: 0px" id=atwAdFrame1 title=Ad height=60 marginHeight=0 src="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/_uac/adpage.html" frameBorder=0 width=260 allowTransparency marginWidth=0 scrolling=no banId="1918609|1"></IFRAME>

<SCRIPT type=text/javascript>setTimeout(function(){if(typeof social_campaign != 'undefined' && jQuery('.print-link')[0].href.indexOf(social_campaign) == -1 ) { var _print_href = jQuery('.print-link')[0].href; jQuery('.print-link').attr( 'href' , _print_href + '&comm_ref=' + social_campaign )} },3000)</SCRIPT><!-- =================================================================== --><!-- =================================================================== --><!-- Now, goes hack's for different layouts -->share this story

<?xml:namespace prefix = fb ns = "http://www.facebook.com/2008/fbml" /><fb:like class=" fb_edge_widget_with_comment fb_iframe_widget" width="244" show_faces="false" font="lucida grande" entry_id="785879" href="http%3A%2F%2Fwww.huffingtonpost.com%2F2010%2F11%2F19%2Fcharlie-rangel-scandal-co_n_785879.html" action="like" locale="en_US" hp_track="Badges"><IFRAME style="WIDTH: 244px; HEIGHT: 23px" id=f39202724846c3e class="fb_ltr " title="Like this content on Facebook." src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?action=like&api_key=46744042133&channel_url=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.ak.facebook.com%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter.php%3Fversion%3D9%23cb%3Df3de1c7fa808b24%26origin%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.huffingtonpost.com%252Ff382c1d5f34dc14%26domain%3Dwww.huffingtonpost.com%26relation%3Dparent.parent&extended_social_context=false&font=lucida%20grande&href=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.huffingtonpost.com%252F2010%252F11%252F19%252Fcharlie-rangel-scandal-co_n_785879.html&layout=standard&locale=en_US&node_type=link&sdk=joey&show_faces=false&width=244" frameBorder=0 allowTransparency name=f247088744ce7da scrolling=no></IFRAME></fb:like>

<!-- Badge layout is: 8 -->9
19
3
<IFRAME style="POSITION: static; MARGIN: 0px; WIDTH: 50px; HEIGHT: 60px; VISIBILITY: visible; TOP: 0px; LEFT: 0px" id=I2_1342565209706 title=+1 tabIndex=0 marginHeight=0 src="https://plusone.google.com/_/+1/fastbutton?bsv=pr&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.huffingtonpost.com%2F2010%2F11%2F19%2Fcharlie-rangel-scandal-co_n_785879.html&size=tall&count=true&origin=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.huffingtonpost.com&hl=en-US&jsh=m%3B%2F_%2Fapps-static%2F_%2Fjs%2Fgapi%2F__features__%2Frt%3Dj%2Fver%3DB8SnDGBcGPY.en.%2Fsv%3D1%2Fam%3D!tlHYjvot7leYTf5X2A%2Fd%3D1%2Frs%3DAItRSTMgtpfo5t4Nbz08_iWrkbwoSBiQhg#id=I2_1342565209706&parent=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.huffingtonpost.com&rpctoken=390009952&_methods=onPlusOne%2C_ready%2C_close%2C_open%2C_resizeMe%2C_renderstart" frameBorder=0 width="100%" allowTransparency name=I2_1342565209706 marginWidth=0 scrolling=no></IFRAME>

<SCRIPT type=text/javascript src="/badge/badges_json_v2.php?sn=facebook_glamorous,retweet_glamorous,email_glamorous,google_plusone_glamorous&gn=window.Badges_3729347_1&eu=http%3A//www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/19/charlie-rangel-scandal-co_n_785879.html%3Fcomm_ref%3Dfalse&id=785879&ebi2&entry_design=&cb=window.Badges_3729347_1.slicesCallback&ng=0"></SCRIPT>
<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> var inst_def = Badges.getUniqName(); window[inst_def.obj_name] = new Badges({ unique_id: inst_def.unique_id, holder_id: "badges_v2_1", human_readable: 0, panel_layout: 8, complete_callback_func_name: "", share_details_callback: false, additional_panel_classes: "", entry_params: { "id" : 785879, "title" : "Charlie Rangel Scandal: Congressman Could Be 23rd House Member To Be Censured", "created_on": 1290174660, "vertical_name": "New York", "tweet_comm_hash" : "", "tweet_comm_text" : "", "force_fb_like" : 1, "custom_tweet_text" : "" }, global_name: "window." + inst_def.obj_name }); // ===================================================== // Now goes logic for every layout window[inst_def.obj_name].setPanelBorderStyle("glamorous_4"); var slices = { 1: "facebook_glamorous", 2: "retweet_glamorous", 3: "email_glamorous", 4: "google_plusone_glamorous" }; // checking for ie7 safari 3 and ff 3.5 browsers because +1 badge not work if ((jQuery.browser.mozilla && (jQuery.browser.version <= '1.9.2')) || (jQuery.browser.msie && (jQuery.browser.version <= '7.0')) || (jQuery.browser.safari && (jQuery.browser.version <= '526.12.2'))) slices[4] = "comment_glamorous"; window[inst_def.obj_name].setSlices(slices); // Finaly, launch our badges Badges.launch("badges_v2_1", inst_def); </SCRIPT><!-- collections badge block --><!-- end collections badge block --><!-- Share Box Block B -->Get New York Alerts
<INPUT id=subscribe_user_email class=share_boxes_input_edit>Sign Up

Submit this story
diggredditstumble



<!-- /Share Box Block B -->

WASHINGTON ? One of Congress' most likable veterans, Rep. Charles Rangel, would become the 23rd House member in the nation's history to be censured if the House goes along with a recommendation of its ethics committee.
After Thanksgiving, House members will take up the solemn task of disciplining one of their own when the New York Democrat is reproached for financial and fundraising misconduct.
It will be one of the more unpleasant jobs in the waning days of the 111th Congress because the congressman from Harlem is legendary for his friendliness and greetings to anyone he passes on the grounds of the Capitol.
The normally self-confident, 80-year-old Rangel, newly re-elected with 40 years of House service behind him, was reduced to pleading with the ethics committee Thursday to refrain from calling him corrupt.
It didn't.
"Although prior committee precedent for recommendation of censure involved many cases of direct financial gain, this committee's recommendation of censure is based on the cumulative nature of the violations and not any direct personal financial gain," the committee said in a report.
The ethics committee deliberated about three hours before voting 9-1 to recommend a censure, plus a requirement that Rangel pay taxes he owes on income from a vacation villa in the Dominican Republic.
If the House agrees to a censure resolution, Rangel would stand before his colleagues at the front of the chamber ? known as the well ? where the resolution of censure would be read by the speaker of the House.
The House has the option of changing the punishment to a reprimand, which eliminates an oral rebuke at the well.
<SCRIPT type=text/javascript>HPAds.adSonar(1523709,2259768,300,250);</SCRIPT><SCRIPT type=text/javascript>adsonar_placementId=1523709;adsonar_pid=2259768;adsonar_ps=-1;adsonar_zw=300;adsonar_zh=250;adsonar_jv="ads.tw.adsonar.com";</SCRIPT><SCRIPT language=JavaScript src="http://js.adsonar.com/js/tw_dfp_adsonar.js" gapi_processed="true"></SCRIPT><FORM style="DISPLAY: none" id=qas_dfp_frm method=get name=qas_dfp_frm action="" target=""><INPUT name=ie52_mac_only type=hidden></FORM><IFRAME id=adsonar_serve196445 height=250 marginHeight=0 src="http://ads.tw.adsonar.com/adserving/getAds.jsp?previousPlacementIds=&placementId=1523709&pid=2259768&ps=-1&zw=300&zh=250&url=http%3A//www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/19/charlie-rangel-scandal-co_n_785879.html&v=5&dct=Charlie%20Rangel%20Scandal%3A%20Congressman%20Could%20Be%2023rd%20House%20Member%20To%20Be%20Censured&ref=http%3A//www.google.com/url%3Fsa%3Dt%26rct%3Dj%26q%3D%26esrc%3Ds%26frm%3D1%26source%3Dweb%26cd%3D1%26ved%3D0CFQQFjAA%26url%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.huffingtonpost.com%252F2010%252F11%252F19%252Fcharlie-rangel-scandal-co_n_785879.html%26ei%3DVusFUOX6LMW0qAHewvHUCQ%26usg%3DAFQjCNF2vQPGbNOcrOyw26J8H1RI2JA7Nw&metakw=charlie,rangel,scandal%3A,congressman,could,be,23rd,house,member,to,be,censured,new,york" frameBorder=0 width=300 name=adsonar_serve196445 marginWidth=0 scrolling=no></IFRAME>
Rangel was convicted in an ethics trial this week by a panel of lawmakers on 11 counts of ethical wrongdoing, including his use of House letterheads and staff to solicit money for a college center named after him. A number of the donors had business before the House Ways and Means Committee while Rangel served as chairman.
Rangel also filed a decade's worth of misleading financial statements understating his assets and converted a subsidized New York apartment ? designated for residential use ? into a campaign office. Other tenants who violated their lease got evicted.
The tax issue was a sore point for several members of the ethics committee, who said it was especially egregious that a former chairman of the House's tax-writing committee failed for 17 years to pay taxes on the income from his island villa.
It's unclear how much Rangel owes in taxes. An ethics committee document indicated he owed $16,775 as of 1990, but Rangel has paid some of his back taxes.
The Rangel case won't end the ethics committee's business. On Nov. 29, the panel of five Democrats and five Republicans will hold an ethics trial for Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif.
Waters is vigorously fighting charges that she improperly attempted to get federal financial aid for a bank where her husband is an investor.
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
Guess what, Skulnutz:

You post lies - nobody cares.

You suck a dick - nobody cares.

You prove you're a moron - nobody cares.

You drop dead tomorrow - nobody cares.

You see, Skulnutz, since you contribute nothing, nobody cares.

If a sewer rat dropped dead tomorrow, more would care about that rat than would care about you.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top