A Number Of Home Dogs This Week

cooz3

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2002
6,026
2
0
boston
22-16-4...POSTED PLAYS...


SEEMS LOTS OF HOME TEAMS GETTING POINTS...WITH THE DOGS COVERING THIS YEAR SO MUCH THIS SEEMED ODD TO ME WHEN I SAW THE PAPER THIS MORNING...

1.) MINNY PLUS 7 AT HOME VS. GB
2.) CINCI GETTING 3.5 VS BROWNS
3.) HOUSTON GETTING 6 VS. JAX
4.) DETROIT GETTING 3 VS. JETS
5.) TITANS GETTING 3 VS. PITT
6.) CHARGERS GETTING 2.5 VS. NINERS

THATS A LOT OF HOME TEAMS GETTING POINTS...ANYONE HAVE ANY THOUGHTS...LIKE MAYBE THE LAW OF AVERAGES PLAYING OUT THE NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS WITH THE FAVES COVERING????...SOME OF THESE TEAMS FAVORED ON THE ROAD HAVE NO BUSINESS GIVING POINTS...JUST SEEMS VERY SUSPICIOUS TO ME....COOZ
 

Nolan Dalla

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2000
1,201
2
0
Washington, DC/Las Vegas, NV
There are two contrary trends at work here. Yes, the home dogs are usually a good bet (all handicapping aside). Trouble is -- home teams have been covering at only a 44 percent clip this season. Home field advantage is clearly not what it used to be in the NFL, so I would be more inclined to bet a dog if the matchup is favorable. I am not saying I will play against these home dogs, only that there are compelling reasons to approach these games with caution. My short comments are as follows:


1.) MINNY PLUS 7 AT HOME VS. GB
Very tough to bet on Minnesota at the moment. Yes, the Vikings usually play GB tough at home and there's the dismal record of the Packers indoors on turf, but the Viking's defense could get fried by the Packers. Now, there's also a QB controvery in Minnesota -- which certainly doesn't help. I wouldn't play the Packers based on history, but pretty tough to find a reason to play on MINN -- one of the NFL's most gutless teams.

2.) CINCI GETTING 3.5 VS BROWNS
I look for Cleveland to get back in form in this game. They have had two weeks to get healthy. Cincy's defense is god-awful and anytime Kitna goes back to pass you have to worry about the defense scoring. Even RB Dillon is on the verge of giving up on this team.

3.) HOUSTON GETTING 6 VS. JAX
Had JAX won the first game between these two, I might play the Texans. But getting upset at home sets the stage for a huge revenge matchup. No way the Jaguars get caught napping this week. Biggest problem is Texans offensive line -- clearly the NFL's worst. Unless I got at least a TD, I wouldn't even consider playing Houston against a team desperate to win and still hanging on to playoff hopes, in a revenge situation no less.

4.) DETROIT GETTING 3 VS. JETS
Pennington's completion rate is the highest in the NFL. That really scares me. I'm not a believer in the Jets as a road favorite, but Detroit seems to have fallen back to earth the last few weeks with two terrible offensive efforts against Dallas and Green Bay.

5.) TITANS GETTING 3 VS. PITT
I'll be on the Steelers this week. Pittsburgh played an awful 4Q last week and gave away the game. That won't happen again. This teams has rolled up double digit leads for five straight weeks and surely won't take this opponent lightly. Now that PITT has a pass offense, and RB Bettis may come back this week, that's a dangerous combination. Titans have played a very soft schedule and now they face a much tougher opponent. I got this at PITT -2.5 early, which is a gift.

6.) CHARGERS GETTING 2.5 VS. NINERS
49ers are now peaking. They get better each week (especially defensively). Unless you can get +3, I'd be wary of a bet on the home Chargers.

Those are just some random thoughts. I am not touting the road teams, just saying that many of these home dogs are getting points for a very good reason........which is -- THEY STINK!

Nolan Dalla
 

cooz3

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2002
6,026
2
0
boston
7.) Seattle now getting 4 at home vs. Denver


Nolan, i would agree with you regarding your reasoning why most of these teams are getting points at home..."they stink"...as soon as a i saw all these homies getting points i immediately thought go the other way...there are certainly reasons why these teams are getting points at home....and statistically you mentioned that home teams are only coverring at a 44% clip....in my opinion the more relevant stat would be what % home dogs are covering at...i personally dont know...so if you or anyone has that information it might be heplful...in the end however i agree its about the matchup and not whether you should bet on a team simply because they are getting points at home...

thanks..cooz
 

kbyoda

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 31, 2001
292
0
0
52
Bethesda, MD
I agree w/ yah Nolan...Thes home dogs (outside of SD in my opinion) for the most part stink! It's gotta even out and I see some Favs covering this week. Wanta look into Valuists thread w/ warm weater teams on the road.....
 

IE

Administrator
Forum Admin
Forum Member
Mar 15, 1999
95,440
223
63
cooz3, i wrote something up on this on IE's page last night, maybe have a look.

thanks

IE
 

GM

PleasureGlutton
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2000
2,962
5
0
124
Toronto, ON, Canada
cooz -

Home dogs are 25-19-2 ATS this year (56.8%).
Road dogs are an amazing 58-38-2 (60.4%).

Home dogs are usually the best bet on the board, but it's been a weird year. Home fav's are so far this year the worst performing bet of the 4 possibilities!
 

Senor Capper

is feeling it
Channel Member
Nov 14, 2000
24,666
115
63
Vegas
www.SenorCapper.com
I beg to differ...

I beg to differ...

On the Brownie / Bengal game.

Bengals.
They have turned things around the last few weeks averaging 30 ppg in their last 2. Dillon ran for yet another 100 yds against the Ravens LW.
Brownies have the worst rushing "O" in the NFL.
Their first get together this year Cincy had 28-15 FD & 156-75 RY edges.
Sure the Brownies are well rested & are starting to click but Cincy, I believe, will give this one their all.

;)
 
Last edited:
Bet on MyBookie
Top