A) atl: $135 to win $100 ML
B) mon: $135 to win $100 RL
3 scenarios:
1) atl wins by 2+. You just lost $35. (A wins 100. B loses 135)
2) Mon wins. You just lost $35. (B wins 100. A loses 135)
3) Atl wins by 1. You just won $200. (A wins 100. B wins 100)
I wrote it up meaning "270 total wagered. If (A) happens, you get back $235, the $135 bet plus the $100 you won"
You must always get something back in this scheme, just like a middle. In the original scheme, you can get middled, as Nolan did last night.
Sorry if I wasn't clear.
TheShrimp
B) mon: $135 to win $100 RL
3 scenarios:
1) atl wins by 2+. You just lost $35. (A wins 100. B loses 135)
2) Mon wins. You just lost $35. (B wins 100. A loses 135)
3) Atl wins by 1. You just won $200. (A wins 100. B wins 100)
I wrote it up meaning "270 total wagered. If (A) happens, you get back $235, the $135 bet plus the $100 you won"
You must always get something back in this scheme, just like a middle. In the original scheme, you can get middled, as Nolan did last night.
Sorry if I wasn't clear.
TheShrimp

