ALCS - Red Sox-Rays

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,053
137
63
Toronto
MJ's mlb playoffs
-----------------
5-5 +1.54
ml: 1-3 -0.94
rl: 1-0 +0.58
1st5: 1-1 -0.82
series: 2-1 +2.72
system sides: 9-6 +164 (based on $100 risk per game)
system value plays: 7-5 +300 (same)

===

Game #1
Matsuzaka@Shields
Rays 61%(n/a...-155 would be even)

Dice was 1-0 with an era of 3.00 in 3 vs Rays '08. Pitched one at the Trop and was great in that one.
Shields was 2-2 with a 5.85 in 4 vs 'Sox '08. That includes an 0-2 with a 21.21 era at Fenway! Two home meetings were April 27th where he tossed a CG ShO, allowing only 2 hits, walking 1 and fanning 7. The other at home was June 30th where he got the W in a 5-4 game, allowing 5 hits and 2 earnies in 6.1 IP.
Line should be closer to -130, I believe.
Down around -120 and I think I'm on it.

Here's what I'm looking at for subsequent games, subject to change somewhat if suspicious:

Game #2
Beckett@Kazmir
Rays 62%(-160 is even; should be cheaper than that)

Beckett was 2-1 2.06 in 5 '08. He threw great at the Trop. Rays will take advantage if he's no better than the ALDS.
Kazmir was 0-2 with a 9.00 era 4 '08 meetings; 0-1 4.50 in 2 @Fenway. A little shaky to close the season but he was solid in the ALDS. 'Sox really smoke lefties but didn't exactly manhandle Saunders.

Game #3
Garza@Lester
Bosox 65%(-185 is even; might be a tad cheaper but will likely be pricey)

Garza was 1-1 with a 4.50 in 4 '08. 0-1 with an 8.44 @Fenway (crushed in 1 meeting). He's much better at home--true for all TB SP's save Sonnanstine. He was pretty grim in the ALDS.
Lester was 3-0 with an 0.90 era in 3 '08 meetings, all at Fenway. This game appears to be the no-brainer of the bunch.

Game #4
Sonnanstine@Byrd
rays 53%(hard to call right now...close to +100 maybe)

or Game #4
Sonnanstine@Wakefield
rays 51%(guessing +115'ish)

Sonnanstine had no decisions but a sweet era of 0.00 in 2 '08 meetings, including 7 shutout inning at Fenway. Very effective in the ALDS.
Byrd had no '08 meetings. He's 2-2 with a 5.14 in his career vs.
Wakefield was 0-2 with a 5.87 era in 3 '08 meetings, all at Tropicana Field. Last was Sept 17th where he was smoked for 6 hits (incl. 3 homers) and 6 earnies in 2.1 IP. He had owned Tampa before this season. He hasn't pitched since September 28th (tossed a solid 5 innings at home vs Yankees, shutting the door).

Save for the Lester meetings, Rays appear to be worth a shot. They play fantastic at the Trop PLUS they should have a serious shot to take game #4 if the 'Sox use a four-man rotation.

I can currently get a series price at +116.
Possible Beckett turnaround is one thing currently holding me back. The other is the possibility of Lester tossing in game #7; that scenario would favour the 'Sox if it's Garza opposing, even at the Trop.

Plays pending.

GL
 

rusty

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 24, 2006
4,627
11
0
Under a mask.
Tough one to figure IMO.
Sox banged up ,plus Beckett not the same as last year.
Thou think he pitches longer into game this next start.One thing always overlooked IMO is experience,that the Sox have a huge edge,

GL either way,should be a good series.
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,053
137
63
Toronto
Agree on the experience angle.
Also agree with DD that the Rays should be just fine at home.
Guessing Rays in 6. As mentioned above, if it goes 7 then I'd fear Lester.

series Rays +113 0.88/1
game #1 Rays -110 1.1/1

Key against Dice will be patience. Rays drew their share of walks in the first round.
That -110 is a bit cheaper than I expected. Gives me a +8 value indicator on the 61% call, above, as -110's have a 53% break-even mark. Best value that my system numbers have presented so far in these playoffs. First "system pick" of the playoffs, which I define as any value indicator or +10, +7 at 60%+ and +5 at 65%+. You'd actually see a higher ROI on a +10 at 50% (+150 line) than a +10 at 60% (+100 line) but I've got a mathematical proof that the +10 in the latter case is more valuable than the +10 in the former--without getting into the details, it has to do with the lower risk at the 60% call than the 50% call.

Hope that doesn't complicate the issue.
I like the K.I.S.S. rule as much as the next guy.

GL
 
Last edited:

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,053
137
63
Toronto
game #2

Rays offense really struggled which might make Beckett a little more confident coming in; much less pressure up 1-0 then down.
Think I should drop that original Rays call down a couple or three point--60% looks like a reasonable ceiling for the call.
No line yet but I'd try Rays better than -120.
Might be -110 to -120. Maybe even cheaper.

I'm barely above even now, for these playoffs.
Shameful.

Thank Hendrix it's Saturday...NCAA.
Holy shit has it ever been a piece of cake compared to the NFL.
Hope I didn't just fuck myself.
Got a couple of demons with a real boner for my annhialation (sic, I think) and I'm looking for a good witchdoctor in town...if you know of one then ring me at 416-555-66613
I'll owe you one.

freakin' Rays...1st and 3rd nobody out and blow me you tools.

catcha tomorrow
GL
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,053
137
63
Toronto
Not terribly excited about this play but got some money from the NCAA to throw away...

game #2 Rays -114 0.57/0.5

Tempted by under4.5 1st5 innings but neither starter is in what you'd call mid-season form and not a very promising ump either. Mind you it was McClelland yesterday who's a major over-ump and, of course, we only saw 2 runs.

This game is up for grabs.
Rays lose and see-ya, wouldn't wanna be ya.

GL

Secret elders of a gentle race
A world that's never seen
Talk of dates for which they sit and wait
All will be revealed

--LZ
 

rusty

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 24, 2006
4,627
11
0
Under a mask.
That strike zone got extra small when Timlin came in.Sad way to end a game when 2 men are practicly given a base by blue.
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,053
137
63
Toronto
Yeah rusty...I've noticed that a lot in these playoffs so far--strike zones have not been very consistent by the umpires.

For game #3 I've decided to bet against my series play. You see a chance you take it.

Bosox 1st5 -0.5 -116 1/0.86
Bosox -1 -127 0.8/0.63

Rays have had their troubles vs lefties this year and certainly against Lester (3-0 0.90 era in 3 during '08, all at Fenway). Garza has been pretty poor on the road (incl. getting crushed in his only Fenway appearance) and was not very effective in the ALDS.

No clue what I'm doing in the other game. Blanton is a model of inconsistency and his '08 batter vs pitcher numbers have seen several key LA bats hit him well. Lowe on 3 days rest and I further notice that his '08 batter vs pitcher numbers has some key Philly sticks hitting him well this season. All that maybe means an over might hit but ump Barrett is no help for that. Likely spectating unless we see a cheap price for the Dodgers, which is unlikely (guessing -150).


GL
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,053
137
63
Toronto
stupid playoff bets: 2-0 +1.8

Not so stupid in hindsight but more on foreskin.

game #4
Sonnanstine@Wakefield
rays 51%(+143)+9

Sticking with the original call, posted above.
If anything I'd be tempted to up it by a point or two as a few key bats (Ellsbury,Ortiz) have been a non-factor so far. A +10 would make it a system pick however and the same are 0-1 so far in these prayoffs.
Tim did great against the Rays in previous years but they appear capable of handling the knuckleball this season. Sonnanstine always seemed to win when I bet against him this season (which was (too) often) so maybe I'll make a larger bet on the Rays and a token bet on the fade. Stupid bets 'R Us.

rays +143 0.7/1

Hopefully a stupid bet.

GL
 

rusty

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 24, 2006
4,627
11
0
Under a mask.
After last nites game,im down on the Sox.
I know this.If they lose tonite theres no comback llike last year vs Cleveland.

Franconia did juggle lineup which was a no-brainer.
ill be watching(no money either side).:scared

By the way nice move by Toronto to bring back Gaston,he still has what it takes to manage,they should contend for a play-off spot next year I would think.
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,053
137
63
Toronto
Don't tease me like that, Rusty--Jays starting pitching could be a major question mark for next season. McGowan coming off surgery, Marcum likely not on the opening day roster and Burnett signing still (way) up in the air. Jays really need to bust a move for a solid free-agent arm, methinks.

game #5
Kashmir@Physical Graffiti
Bosox 58%(-149)-2 rays 42(+141)0
over9 60%(+113)+13
ump Marquez is a decent over-ump

Tempted by both team totals over--Rays at a 4 (+117) and Bosox at 4.5 (-108). Opponent's hitting .298 so far off of Kazmir in the playoffs, not to mention that (regular season) the 'Sox walked 14 times off him while only fanning 13 times. Ump should help with the walks total, too (rather low K% this season, similar to years past). In Kazmir's last 10 starts the Rays have supported him with AT LEAST 5 runs each and every time and, of course, their sticks are enjoying this Fenway visit so far. I don't think that the 'Sox will go quiety so they should plate their share. With a bit of luck we'll see Byrd-is-the-word trotting in early.

over9 +113 0.44/0.5

Bet size is more a reflection of my confidence presently as opposed to anything else...been procratinating over this mother for the past 4 or 5 hours...price improved from +109 to give me a pair of lucky 13's (including V.I.). 'Course, either starter is on and this play becomes another stupid bet.

Stupid bet?
Shit...sure hope so.

To paraphrase Nietzsche, Gop is dead.
Those unindoctinated probably realize the status quo will not disolve regardless.

I miss baseball already.

GL

hey Matt, you could at least call me to tell me what the score is. Sorta figured it out on my own but it would be nice to hear. I'll be up by around gametime. 416-666-1313.
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,053
137
63
Toronto
game #6
Beckett@Shields
Rays 61%(-139)+2
over9 54%(-104)+3

Not much value by my assessments. I'm a spectator. Sorta. Could use the Rays for my series play. Will contemplate a hedge if Lester goes in #7. I called Rays in 6 before the series started so maybe I can be correct on something for twice in my lives.

GL
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,053
137
63
Toronto
game #7
Lester@Garza
Rays 52%(+119)+6
under9 52%(-122)-3
McLelland is a major over-ump

Had a base of 58% on the under but really needed to adjust it down due to McLelland.
Game looks close to a coin-toss but I'm giving the medium-level value a go with the home side.

Rays +119 1.68/2

Rays win and I'll be inclined to try the Phillies for the Series.
Bosox win and I will pound Philly.

GL
 

rusty

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 24, 2006
4,627
11
0
Under a mask.
Think this pitching match-up heavily favors Boston.
Dont see Boston lettn up now.

If anything they must be licking there chops.
Could hear a pin drop in that stadium last nite.
Almost like the TB fans were anticipating the worst.

Odviously anything can happen,but I think this could be the game that Boston breaks out in.

GL!
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top