amazing!!!!!!!!!!!!

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
168
63
Bowling Green Ky
Donkey Party's Assets Frozen

Wednesday, June 22, 2005

By Brit Hume



Now some fresh pickings from the Political Grapevine:

Florida's Democratic Party has had its assets frozen by the IRS (search) for failing to pay tens of thousands of dollars in Social Security (search) and income taxes. The party owes about $124,000 in back payments and another $78,000 in interest and penalties. (Source: Tallahassee Democrat)

But it only has about $98,000 in its bank account, after losing track of more than $900,000 in donations and other funds. Records show the organization netted nearly $1.2 million the last two years, but somehow ended up with only $269,000 in the bank at the start of this year. The party insists it's an "isolated incident," and wants the IRS to conduct a new audit.

As for paying the debt, the party says, "That's being worked on." And Wednesday, according to the Tallahassee Democrat newspaper, the chairman of the state party drew about $100,000 from the Democratic National Committee to help resolve the problem.

Prisoner Treatment Poll

A new Rasmussen Reports poll out Wednesday shows that only a fifth of Americans say prisoners at Guantanamo Bay (search) are being treated unfairly. The vast majority says prisoners are being treated about right, or better than they deserve. What's more, only 14 percent of Americans say prisoner treatment at Guantanamo Bay is similar to that of the Nazis. 69 percent disagree.

Victims' Firms Not Donating to Fund

The only defense contractors to lose employees in the Pentagon attacks on 9/11 were consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton, technology firm BTG, and Verizon Communications, but so far two of them haven't given anything to the Pentagon Memorial Fund, and the third has yet to make a substantial contribution.

According to the DC Examiner newspaper, fundraising efforts have brought in just over a quarter of the $28 million needed to build and maintain the memorial. Verizon says it "respectfully declined" to donate because it's already given millions to various 9/11 charities. BTG says it made a donation "some time ago," but fund documents show it made no donation over $5,000. As for Booz Allen, it insists it will make a "significant" donation in the "relatively near future."

Pledge for Programs

Travis County, Texas, district attorney Ronnie Earle (search), who insists his investigation into a group founded by House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (search) is not political, has dropped felony charges against several corporations indicted in the probe ? in exchange for helping one of his pet causes.

In September a grand jury in Travis County charged eight corporations with making illegal contributions. But, according to the National Review's Byron York, Earle then agreed to dismiss charges against four of them after they pledged to contribute as much as $100,000 to the University of Texas' School of Public Affairs, where the money would fund programs on corporate influence in American democracy.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
168
63
Bowling Green Ky
Place Your Bets

Friday, June 24, 2005
By Brit Hume



Now some fresh pickings from the Political Grapevine:

Euros for Terrorists

The insurgents in Iraq need money to keep attacking American and Iraqi forces and they're getting some of it from a surprising source ?- anti-American Europeans, who have started a campaign dubbed 'Ten Euros for the Resistance" to provide aid and comfort to terrorist forces in Iraq.

Organizers for the multi-national movement say they hope to broaden support for the insurgency from just fringe leftists, to the more inclusive antiwar and anti-globalization movements. One observer at the group's rallies told U.S.News and World Report that the campaign plans to send "everything it takes" including weapons to help the insurgents on to victory. But one person told the magazine the leftists may not be all that much help, noting that many of the European militants looked so ragged, they're unlikely to have 10 euros to contribute.

Place your Bets

It may be more than three years until the next presidential election, but oddsmakers are already taking bets on the winner ? and the smart money is on Senator Hillary Clinton (search). Online bookmakers at SportsInteraction.com give the New York Democrat 7-to-2 odds on winning in 2008.

Republican Rudy Giuliani (search) trails close behind at 5-to-1, while New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson and former Vice Presidential Candidate John Edwards stand at 12-to-1. And if you're looking for a long shot, place your bets on last year's Democratic Nominee John Kerry ? a 40-to-1 underdog to win the presidency.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
By Bill O'Reilly



A "Talking Points Memo", what you the folks think about Guantanamo Bay (search). As you know, the left-wing press has been relentless in pounding home the theme that the U.S. is torturing suspected terrorists. Almost every day, we hear that in the media.

Now there's a new Rasmussen poll out on the issue. The question, what do you think of the treatment detainees have been given at Gitmo? Just 20 percent of Americans say it's been unfair. Thirty-six believe it is better than the detainees deserve. And 34 percent say the treatment is about right.

Obviously, a huge gap between the anti-Bush media and what they believe and what everyday Americans believe. Somebody alert the Minneapolis Star Tribune (search ).

Most Americans understand the danger the terrorists pose to the USA and the difficulty in fighting said terrorists. Also, most Americans know there's a difference between dissenting from how the war on terror is being fought and undermining the war on terror.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Media Double Standard?

Thursday, June 23, 2005

By Neil Cavuto



Think quick: What's the difference between Kitty Kelly (search) and Edward Klein? (search)

Kitty can get on TV shows to talk about her books. Ed's having a devil of a time doing the same with his.

Double standard? I don't know. Here's what I do know: Kitty wasted no time dishing dirt and worse on the president in her bestseller "The Family: The Real Story of the Bush Dynasty."

Klein's dishing dirt too. Not on the Bushes, but the Clintons ? more specifically, Hillary Clinton, in "The Truth About Hillary."

Both books are way over the top ? wild accusations and lots of un-named sources.

But here's the difference: Kitty got booked on shows. Ed is getting no bookings, period.

Kitty's book came out in the heat of last year's presidential election. Ed's is poised right before Hillary's Senate re-election.

Could it be the media relished dirt on the president, less so on the woman who wants to be president?

Who knows? All I know is if it's OK for Kitty to make outlandish claims on TV news and talk shows about the Bush family, why is it not OK for Ed to dish out the same about the Clinton family?

We're told it's because of lots of un-named sources ? there's no way to tell and no way to know.

I say, good. But I also say, stop.

Why is it OK to dump on one family with un-sourced dirt, but not on another?

I think the American people are smart enough to weigh these sort of things carefully.

They apparently had serious doubts about the stuff Kitty littered ? they probably have the same thoughts about Ed's dreads.

I frankly hate these kind of personal ? often baseless ? nameless attacks anyway. I say a pox on both their editorial houses.

It's just interesting to me that Ed can't find a microphone for his musings on a media darling. But Kelly had no such problem for hers on someone who was anything but a media darling.






.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
i heard klein claimed that hil was a closet lesbian......and that chelsea either wasn`t bill`s,or he raped hillary?....not sure...i didn`t read it....

but,it`s hard to give any credence to this crap....and anyway,i could care less....

just like i didn`t give a damn whether bill was getting a hummer in the oval office....

some things are better left unsaid....even if true....

like kitty kelly`s book...

very sad....and probably will give hillary a bounce because i think that most in the public don`t agree with this kind of character assassination..

this is why i hate the kennedy`s,the dean`s and the durbins..and defend bush..i don`t love bush...but some of this stuff is ridiculous......no class...lack of civility...

cheapshot artists

apparently this guy klein fits into that mold...

if i get the chance i`ll read it...or some of it...but i wouldn`t pay for it...
 

smurphy

cartographer
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,910
135
63
16
L.A.
I'll take a cheap shot over a kill shot anyday. Bush is full of cheap shots anyway. The character assault on Kerry's swiftboat service was cheap and incorrect. Yet, Kerry is the one who suffered, while Bush got a nice bounce. People claim to be put off by slander, but they still fall for it most of the time.

I doubt there were any Bush supporters put off by the lack of civility on the attack of Kerry's service to the point of switching votes.

I'll at least respect the likes of Dean in that he'll say it up front, instead getting a hitman like Rove to do it. Make no mistake, Bush dispenses plenty of propaganda - only he does through other people.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
168
63
Bowling Green Ky
"Instead of whining, why doesn't Cavuto put Klein on his own show?"

Same reason O'Reilly won't--they don't condone personal attacks for most part regardless of which side of the fence--unlike liberal media--per above.

Have seen numerous conservatives condem attack on Hillary's personal life--how many from liberal media condemned Kitty's??
In fact some even offered up forged documents in support!!!!

It goes back to "values" ;)
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
168
63
Bowling Green Ky
"Do you wiork for Fox News?"
:) Nope Smurph but thought items you don't find in liberal media would be of interest.

and speaking of intersting I found something that is quite puzzeling. In doing research on Supreme Court justices only liberals Ginsberg and Berger where appoint by dem pres (Clinton)--the others were appointed by Rebs--WHY would a conservative Pres appoint a liberal justice??????
 

Master Capper

Emperior
Forum Member
Jan 12, 2002
9,104
11
0
Dunedin, Florida
A President should appoint a middle of the road justice to reflect a country that is split down the middle. I would highly doubt if Bush has this ability due to the fact he is at the beck and call of the religious right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nosigar

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
DOGS THAT BARK said:
and speaking of intersting I found something that is quite puzzeling. In doing research on Supreme Court justices only liberals Ginsberg and Berger where appoint by dem pres (Clinton)--the others were appointed by Rebs--WHY would a conservative Pres appoint a liberal justice??????

It might seem like a foreign concept, but I would imagine that those republican presidents actually chose people who they thought were the best for the job without regard to politics. Is that possible? Let's remember, not *every* president has been a total idealogue.
 
P

PRO190

Guest
Thursday, June 23, 2005

By Neil Cavuto



Think quick: What's the difference between Kitty Kelly (search) and Edward Klein? (search)

Kitty can get on TV shows to talk about her books. Ed's having a devil of a time doing the same with his.

Double standard? I don't know. Here's what I do know: Kitty wasted no time dishing dirt and worse on the president in her bestseller "The Family: The Real Story of the Bush Dynasty."

Klein's dishing dirt too. Not on the Bushes, but the Clintons ? more specifically, Hillary Clinton, in "The Truth About Hillary."

Both books are way over the top ? wild accusations and lots of un-named sources.

But here's the difference: Kitty got booked on shows. Ed is getting no bookings, period.

Kitty's book came out in the heat of last year's presidential election. Ed's is poised right before Hillary's Senate re-election.

Could it be the media relished dirt on the president, less so on the woman who wants to be president?

Who knows? All I know is if it's OK for Kitty to make outlandish claims on TV news and talk shows about the Bush family, why is it not OK for Ed to dish out the same about the Clinton family?

We're told it's because of lots of un-named sources ? there's no way to tell and no way to know.

I say, good. But I also say, stop.

Why is it OK to dump on one family with un-sourced dirt, but not on another?

I think the American people are smart enough to weigh these sort of things carefully.

They apparently had serious doubts about the stuff Kitty littered ? they probably have the same thoughts about Ed's dreads.

I frankly hate these kind of personal ? often baseless ? nameless attacks anyway. I say a pox on both their editorial houses.

It's just interesting to me that Ed can't find a microphone for his musings on a media darling. But Kelly had no such problem for hers on someone who was anything but a media darling.


Actually Klein was on the Al Franken show Friday: What does Franken do but bring on Left wing Hack columnist Joe Conason that found three dubious "mistakes" out of 360 pages and ambush Klein:
Whether Klein and his book deserve criticism is up to each persons view but these CLOWNS pursued Klein in a manner that made them look more Foolish than Kliens so called "mistakes "....







.
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
Master Capper said:
A President should appoint a middle of the road justice to reflect a country that is split down the middle. I would highly doubt if Bush has this ability due to the fact he is at the beck and call of the religious right.

I actually think that even that idiot realizes that if he chooses somebody far-right/anti roe-wade, he will be in for a HUGE fight and won't get such a person confirmed. We saw what happened with circuit court judges and we see what is currently happening with Bolton. Can you imagine what will happen with a Supreme Court nominee, if he chooses a certain type? Luckily for us, there are still checks and balances, even with one party running congress and the White House. Our wannabe dictator can't just ramrod his agenda down our throats. Well, sometimes he can- see: Iraq.
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
PRO190 said:
Actually Klein was on the Al Franken show Friday: What does Franken do but bring on Left wing Hack columnist Joe Conason that found three dubious "mistakes" out of 360 pages and ambush Klein:
Whether Klein and his book deserve criticism is up to each persons view but these CLOWNS pursued Klein in a manner that made them look more Foolish than Kliens so called "mistakes "....

lol-I hadn't seen that. Looks like Franken tried to trap him and came away looking stupid.
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
DOGS THAT BARK said:
"Instead of whining, why doesn't Cavuto put Klein on his own show?"

Same reason O'Reilly won't--they don't condone personal attacks for most part regardless of which side of the fence--unlike liberal media--per above.

Have seen numerous conservatives condem attack on Hillary's personal life--how many from liberal media condemned Kitty's??
In fact some even offered up forged documents in support!!!!

It goes back to "values" ;)

lol- I can buy the part about Cavuto, but you must be joking about O'Relly being above personal attacks.

And yes, of course, conservatives have a monopoly on 'values.'
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
168
63
Bowling Green Ky
"The office of Senator Ted Kennedy (search), who last week told Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld that U.S. forces in Iraq were caught in a "quagmire," and suggested he should resign, has now confirmed that the Massachusetts Democrat has never been to Iraq.

According to the Pentagon, some 265 members of Congress have visited the embattled nation, including 57 senators and every member of the Senate Armed Services Committee ? except three. West Virginia Democrat Robert Byrd (search) hasn't been there for health reasons, and North Carolina Republican Elizabeth Dole (search) has plans to go. There's been no explanation as to why Kennedy has never been."

My guess it would be fear factor--and not so much of terrorist but more so our own troops.Would love to see him and Durbin inserted with our troops in combat atmosphere ;)
 
Last edited:

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
168
63
Bowling Green Ky
Well I have to report the liberal press is now responding to the reports of Dems and Rebs that visited Guantanamo prison recently--
Here is their response--would you expect anything different :)

These liberals won't even believe their fellow Dems--What sico's--Just think if they were ever in power???


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. lawmakers just back from visiting the Guantanamo prison compared it to a resort, but Democrats complained of a "whitewash" at a hearing on Wednesday because they were unable to hear from an attorney for detainees.

and a little on fair and balanced--note in Brit Humes assessment he noted more Rebs responded to poll--he didn't have to say that ;)

--and I am still waiting for copy of any liberal source that had more quotes of Bush in HIS speech than liberal comments after it---



After the Address...

Wednesday, June 29, 2005

By Brit Hume



Now some fresh pickings from the Political Grapevine:

In a snap Gallup poll taken after the president's address Tuesday night, in which far more Republicans than Democrats responded, the vast majority says their reaction to the speech was positive. In fact, nearly half say their reaction was "very positive."

What's more, 54 percent now say the U.S. and its allies are winning the war in Iraq, compared with only 44 percent who said that before the speech. And substantially more now say President Bush (search) has a clear plan for handling the situation in Iraq, and say the U.S. should stay there until the situation improves.

Property, Please?

Just days after the Supreme Court (search) said local governments could seize people's homes for the public good, a California businessman has written a letter to the government of Weare, New Hampshire, urging it to seize the property at 34 Cilley Hill Road, so he can build a hotel there.

That address is currently the home of Supreme Court Justice David Souter (search) ? who was in the majority of last week's decision. Logan Darrow Clements, of Freestar Media, says his hotel would "serve the public interest" by boosting Weare's economic development and tax revenue. Plus, he says, the hotel ? to be named "The Lost Liberty Hotel" ? will feature an exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. The city board is slated to discuss the proposal at its next meeting.
 
Last edited:

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
DOGS THAT BARK said:
Property, Please?

Just days after the Supreme Court (search) said local governments could seize people's homes for the public good, a California businessman has written a letter to the government of Weare, New Hampshire, urging it to seize the property at 34 Cilley Hill Road, so he can build a hotel there.

That address is currently the home of Supreme Court Justice David Souter (search) ? who was in the majority of last week's decision. Logan Darrow Clements, of Freestar Media, says his hotel would "serve the public interest" by boosting Weare's economic development and tax revenue. Plus, he says, the hotel ? to be named "The Lost Liberty Hotel" ? will feature an exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. The city board is slated to discuss the proposal at its next meeting.

That's pretty funny and would be f*cking hilarious if Clements were to somehow win.
 

bjfinste

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2001
5,462
18
0
AZ
DOGS THAT BARK said:
Property, Please?

Just days after the Supreme Court (search) said local governments could seize people's homes for the public good, a California businessman has written a letter to the government of Weare, New Hampshire, urging it to seize the property at 34 Cilley Hill Road, so he can build a hotel there.

That address is currently the home of Supreme Court Justice David Souter (search) ? who was in the majority of last week's decision. Logan Darrow Clements, of Freestar Media, says his hotel would "serve the public interest" by boosting Weare's economic development and tax revenue. Plus, he says, the hotel ? to be named "The Lost Liberty Hotel" ? will feature an exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. The city board is slated to discuss the proposal at its next meeting.

That is awesome! Good work, Mr. Clements.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
168
63
Bowling Green Ky
Made note previously of abuse BY prisonors against or troops at Guantanamo Bay and how liberal press failed to report--will have to give them benefit of doubt now as AP has finally did front page report--I'll give em a thumbs up and hope others follow---


AP: Documents Show Gitmo Inmates Defy U.S. By BEN FOX, Associated Press Writer
1 hour, 39 minutes ago



SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico - Military authorities have previously disclosed some incidents of guard retaliation at Guantanamo Bay, which resulted in mostly minor disciplinary proceedings. What emerges from 278 pages of documents obtained by The Associated Press is the degree of defiance by the terrorism suspects at Guantanamo.

ADVERTISEMENT

The prisoners banged on their cells to protest the heat. They doused guards with whatever liquid was handy ? from spit to urine. Sometimes they struck their jailers, one swinging a steel chair at a military police officer.

And the American MPs at times retaliated with force ? punches, pepper spray and a splash of cleaning fluid in the face, according to the newly released documents that detail military investigations and eyewitness accounts of alleged abuse.

Some prisoners at the U.S. base in eastern Cuba have gone on the attack, as in April 2003 when a detainee got out of his cell during a search for contraband food and knocked out a guard's tooth with a punch to the mouth and bit him before he was subdued by MPs. One soldier delivered two blows to the inmate's head with a handheld radio, the documents show.

"Several guards were trying to hold down the detainee who was putting up heavy resistance," recounted a translator who saw the incident. "The detainee was covered in blood as were some of the guards."

The soldier who struck the inmate, and was dropped in rank to private first class as a result, described it as a close call. "The detainee was fighting as if he really wanted to hurt us. ... We all saved each other's lives in my opinion," he wrote.

The documents, obtained under a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by AP, are far from a comprehensive look at Guantanamo and do not provide full details about each incident.

Names and some other identifying details have been blacked out by military censors. Handwriting at times isn't legible and pages appear to be missing or out of sequence. In some cases, it is not possible to decipher who did what to whom. Disciplinary measures against the troops were either relatively minor or unclear in some reports.

The internal investigative reports do, however, provide a snapshot of life behind the wire at Guantanamo, depicting a tense, hostile and sometimes chaotic place.

In one of the more serious incidents described in the documents, detainees told guards that an MP threw the cleaning liquid Pine-Sol in the eyes of a prisoner in the middle of one night in January 2004. In a written statement, another soldier said he came in immediately afterward to find what smelled like cleaning liquid dripping from the cell.

"The detainee could be seen rubbing his eyes intensely and moaning in pain," he said.

Documents show that the guard, from the 661st Military Police Company, did not admit throwing the cleaning fluid when questioned about it that night but did say the detainee had spit on him, and may have thrown urine.

A medic on the cell block flushed the detainee's eyes with water, a witness said.

A Department of Defense investigative memo written six months later concluded the soldier had mistreated detainees twice ? the second offense involved cursing at inmates ? and that his superiors failed to report either episode.

Investigators recommended disciplinary action against the soldier and a probe into why the incident wasn't reported up the chain of command, but the outcome is unclear from the papers.

In a statement to investigators, one service member said he hadn't seen the Pine-Sol incident but noted that U.S. personnel have been taught to use restraint with detainees: "The training we have received here at Guantanamo Bay has always stressed ... that no matter what happens on the block do not retaliate ... it will just get you into trouble."

Still, tensions between prisoners and guards have been high since the first suspects arrived in early 2002, hooded and shackled, mostly from the battlefields of Afghanistan.

The detainees' defiance discussed in the documents ranged from mild ? prisoners getting matching haircuts in a show of solidarity or refusing orders to stop practicing martial arts in the exercise yard ? to hostile acts like spitting or throwing unknown liquids at the MPs. One soldier used pepper spray on prisoners because, he said in a report to superiors, he feared that the unknown liquids hurled could pose a health danger.

One soldier told military investigators he punched a detainee's face because the man spit at him and hit him as he tried to put him in restraints at the prison hospital in October 2004.

"My instincts took over after the hitting and spitting," said the soldier. Documents show authorities recommended that the punishment include reduction in rank to E-4, loss of a month's pay and extra duty for 45 days, though the outcome is unclear.

In the prison camp's early days, inmates showed their anger over the heat and the practice of leaving lights on in their cells at night by banging on the bars throughout one guard shift in September 2002, the documents say. One detainee who was believed to be leading the protest threw what an MP said smelled like water from the toilet on him. The MP tried to spray water from a hose in response, but the detainee blocked it with a mat.

The guard who tried to spray the detainee was charged with assault, given a reduction in rank to private first class, which was suspended, and reassigned to other duties at Guantanamo.

In another case, an inmate threw a partially full urine bottle at an MP in May 2002, apparently because he believed the soldier had intentionally kicked his hospital bed. When the soldier threw the urinal back, the detainee grabbed a steel chair and swung it at guards before they subdued him.

A military witness defended the MP, writing: "I believe (name deleted) to be a good and honest soldier ... and just influenced by negative elements among us." The documents don't make clear what punishment, if any, the MP got.

Military officials at Guantanamo did not respond this week to questions about relations between guards and detainees at the camp, which has held some 700 prisoners from 45 countries since it opened. There are about 540 detainees there now.

___

EDITOR'S NOTE: This story is based on information contained in 278 pages of U.S. military documents dealing with investigations of alleged abuse of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. The Associated Press obtained the documents under a Freedom of Information lawsuit.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,489
168
63
Bowling Green Ky
President Like a 'Mad' Man?

Monday, July 11, 2005

By Brit Hume



Now some fresh pickings from the Political Grapevine:

Deficit to Go Down

A surge in tax revenue is cutting this year's budget deficit by as much as $90 billion ? that according to the Congressional Budget Office (search). The CBO says daily tax revenue is now $1 billion higher than it was a year ago and that will likely bring last year's record deficit of $412 billion to about $325 billion this year.

What's more, according to Bloomberg News, the deficit could drop as low as $250 billion next year ? which means President Bush could fulfill last year's promise to significantly cut the annual deficit by 2009, three years early. Just a few months ago, the government was projecting the deficit to rise.

New Poll Results

A new Pew Research poll ? taken after last week's terrorist attacks in London ? shows that President Bush's job approval ratings have risen, from 42 percent last month to 47 percent now. Meanwhile, in a new Rasmussen Reports poll, 58 percent of likely voters say that if President Bush nominates a qualified conservative to the Supreme Court (search), Senate Democrats should vote to confirm the nominee.

This follows a recent Gallup poll, in which a similar 58 percent said it is "very likely" that Senate Democrats would try to block a Bush nominee for inappropriate political reasons. Another 28 percent said it is "somewhat likely."

Most Stories Were Negative

A new survey of network TV news coverage shows that in the first 100 days of President Bush's second term, the solid majority of stories on ABC, NBC and CBS were negative. Specifically, stories about the president on ABC's nightly newscast were 78 percent negative, on CBS they were 71 percent negative, and on NBC they were 57 percent negative.

Overall, 78 percent of stories on President Bush's Social Security reforms were negative, as were 77 percent of stories on domestic policy, 71 percent on Iraq policy, and 58 percent on foreign policy.

President Like a ?Mad? Man?

New York Democratic Senator Hillary Clinton (search) says President Bush reminds her of Mad magazine's freckle-faced mascot, Alfred E. Neuman (search). In Colorado over the weekend, Clinton said, "I sometimes feel that ? Neuman is in charge in Washington," insisting that, like Neuman, the president's attitude toward tough issues is "What, me worry?"

New York Republicans call that "insulting" and a "partisan jab." Meanwhile, the liberal journal The Nation is claiming credit for Clinton's comparison, noting that it "had the same thought" in 2000, when it ran a cover featuring Mr. Bush, then a presidential candidate, as Neuman.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top