Another Tuesday System Play
- Thread starter Shleprock
- Start date
System Record to Date if my records are correct:
NCAA: 5-8
NFL: 10-4, with 4 outright winners
Total: 15-12 55%
NCAA: 5-8
NFL: 10-4, with 4 outright winners
Total: 15-12 55%
Saint
Saint
I have been keeping an eye on this system.
And from what I seen this system is definitely doing much better in the NFL. This doesn't mean that the Ncaa will continue its slide. Giving time, the Ncaa may turn out to be pretty good as well.
Saint
I have been keeping an eye on this system.
And from what I seen this system is definitely doing much better in the NFL. This doesn't mean that the Ncaa will continue its slide. Giving time, the Ncaa may turn out to be pretty good as well.
Yeah I agree. I wasn't posting it to knock Shlep- We're all on the same team...wanting to take $$ from our books. If the system is working, great. If not, it's good to know.
- Jan 21, 2007
- 1,594
- 29
- 0
I am disappointed with college record I have it at 6-7. 5 teams won game outright and 2 of the wins were triple plays. So if there is any consolation you would be up 3 units in college. As I stated when there is a triple play which are rare you bet 3x your normal bet. Plays are normal is a 1 unit, 2 is a double, and a 3 is a triple play. In NFL 10-4 with 6 teams winning outright. College will turn around there were 5 games that were just bad beats but this is not would of could have should have. Eventually college will even out bad losses. It is still early so there is alot of catching up to do in college. Overall 16-11 ats if you go by units won it is +9. The goal however is to have an overall record of 70% or better.
Last edited:
Shleprock
Shleprock
I agree, I think the college will even out.
I think you have a GOOD system here.
Patience is the virtue. Thanks for the feedback.
:toast:
Shleprock
I agree, I think the college will even out.
I think you have a GOOD system here.
Patience is the virtue. Thanks for the feedback.
:toast:
- Jan 21, 2007
- 1,594
- 29
- 0
Saint
Saint
I knew you were NOT knocking Shleprock.
This is GOOD and interesting dialogue in this thread.
I wish all the threads were like this one.
Everytime I turn around someone is bashing someone.
This thread is actually a BREATH of FRESH air.!!!
Thanks for sharing....................:0074
Saint
I knew you were NOT knocking Shleprock.
This is GOOD and interesting dialogue in this thread.
I wish all the threads were like this one.
Everytime I turn around someone is bashing someone.
This thread is actually a BREATH of FRESH air.!!!
Thanks for sharing....................:0074
Although you didn't state it, when you called the Michigan a "huge system play" and an "extra big play" then I'd assume that was a 3u loss which puts NCAA about even...which, is still good.
You are right, NCAA is 6-7 so that's positive, my mistake.
Again, it would be freaking awesome for this system to work and part of tracking systems is to keep good records- which it seems like you're doing.
You mention 70% ats...have you tracked it prior to last year? Is this something that can be tracked in previous years using database lines? Is the info you use available to look back further? If so and you need help going through I'm a numbers guy and would be glad to help out-
Agree were working towarrds beating the book. Not bashing. You have to becarefull with anyone system. Feal it out go slow look for other info to support the play. I have ??. What makes a single play become a double. I never herd of this before.
- Jan 21, 2007
- 1,594
- 29
- 0
The line I got for Michigan would have been a double play I know it went up to 6 .5 later on but when I posted it was lower so I go by that line. I did track this system the past 2 years for90 games both years. I can only go back 1 day for info than they wipe it out. I was going to post record every 1/3 of 90 games but I will post current record when I post.
- Nov 30, 2003
- 3,834
- 298
- 83
- Jan 21, 2007
- 1,594
- 29
- 0
