Another Week, Another Gunman

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows


WOW !

That's a blanket statement :facepalm:

Following your logic, or lack of it, anyone who believes in the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights are " FUCKING NUTS"

I teach and preach and drill into my children repeatedly !

THINK 3 STEPS AHEAD OF WHAT YOU ARE ABOUT TO SAY OR DO AND WHAT THE RAMIFICATIONS COULD BE

Seems to me that as an adult, allegedly, that thought process is something you are incapable of.

Why doctors are more dangerous than guns - new Health Ranger investigation video


Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036679_doctors_guns_fatalities.html#ixzz24Ts2
gMVd

I wonder if this makes "US Fire Arms Owners, Legally owned, "FUCKING NUTS" as well?

Third Amendment - Quartering Soldiers


[SIZE=+1] No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.[/SIZE]
3rd Amendment Annotations

There has been no Supreme Court explication of this Amendment, which was obviously one guarantee of the preference for the civilian over the military. 1
Footnotes
[Footnote 1] In fact, save for the curious case of Engblom v. Carey, 677 F. 2d 957 (2d Cir. 1982), on remand, 572 F. Supp. 44 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd. per curiam, 724 F.2d 28 (2d Cir. 1983), there has been no judicial explication at all.


Please,

make your best case for this analysis without any personal attacks, if you can.
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,418
700
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
10 Tragic Accidents Caused by Mobile Phones

Published <ABBR class=published title=2009-03-20T14:32:34+0100>March 20, 2009</ABBR> by Kathryn Vercillo in Uncategorized
phone-crash-1.jpg
There are many cell phone laws out there across the world which prevent people from using their mobiles phones while driving. Some places have laws that prevent any use of the phone inside the car, others allow only voice calls that are hands-free and some have the baffling law that doesn?t allow voice calls but does allow text messaging while driving. The laws may be confusing but the reason for those laws is clear ? people who use their phones while driving are not responsible drivers and they end up causing a bunch of accidents on the road.
Take a look at ten accidents in recent history that were caused by the use of a mobile phone while driving:
1. LA Commuter Train Crash. This horrific train crash that happened in September was the deadliest train crash in the United States in almost two decades and it has been found that text messaging by the train?s crew is at least partially to blame for the crash. It was discovered that the Metrolink engineer who failed to stop the train at a signal had sent or received over forty text messages and made four calls during his shift that day, including one message sent less than half a minute prior to the crash. Although there were many other factors involved in the crash, including reported drug use by crew members, text messaging has been labeled as one of the key reasons that this accident occurred. The crash cost the lives of 25 people and cost over $10 million in damages.
2. The Case of Lord Ahmed. This man is a member of the House of Lords and holds the distinction of being the first Muslim life peer for the United Kingdom. He is also someone who only recently got out of jail after he was involved in a fatal car accident involving not one but two mobile phones. First, there was the man that he hit who was a drunk driver that crashed his own car. He exited the car but then decided to return to the car because he needed to get his mobile phone. While he was doing that, Lord Ahmed was busy in the area sending multiple text messages while driving. Distracted, he didn?t see the man returning to his car to get his mobile phone and he hit and killed the man. He spent a bit of time in jail but ultimately his sentence was changed from ?causing death by dangerous driving? to simply ?dangerous driving? and he is now free.
3. Going Back for a Mobile Phone. Apparently this problem of going back to get a mobile phone and then ending up in a car accident is neither rare nor new. Back in 2003, there was a man in Austria who managed to get run over by his own car as a result of needing to go get his mobile phone. He had left the phone inside the house so he exited his car, went in and got it. When he came back, he saw his car rolling down the driveway where he?d left it running. His solution was to throw himself at the car and the result was a series of broken limbs. But at least he had his cell phone to call for help.
4. Smashing into Stopped Cars. A quick scan through the history of accidents involving cell phones shows that there are a whole series of accidents caused by distracted drivers who slam into cars that are actually stopped. For example, a UK woman recently sent over twenty text messages while driving at 70mph before she slammed into the car of a woman who was stopped in the street due to a flat tire. The woman was killed.
5. Driver in Denial. There was a case in 2006 of a lorry driver who killed a woman while he was driving using his cell phone. The case is comparable to many other cases of truck drivers hitting smaller cars while mis-using their mobile phones on the road. He was distracted while entering a number into his phone, hit a car that was at a complete stop and basically rolled right on to it, crushing the female driver to death and causing her car to light on fire and burn her body. Half a dozen other vehicles were damaged in the accident. What stands out as unique in this case is the fact that the driver immediately denied using the mobile phone and later blamed the accident on his bouts with depression and anxiety.
6. Death of Five Cheerleaders. Another case where the driver of a large vehicle (this time a tractor trailer) hit a small car and caused a fatal accident happened back in 2007 in Western New York. A car carrying five cheerleaders who were just celebrating their high school graduation together was hit by a driver who was distracted because he was text messaging on the road. All five girls were killed.
7. Hit and Run After Hitting 2 Teens. It?s just plain wrong to hit someone with your car and then leave the scene of the crime which is exactly what happened in this case. Two fifteen-year old best friends were walking down the street when a man distracted by trying to plug in his cell phone plowed his car right into them. He panicked and left the scene of the crime; one of the girls was killed.
8. 2 Separate Accidents, 2 9-Year-Olds Die. Colorado has had some serious problems in the recent past with cell phone car accidents. In the span of just three months there have been two different incidents in which a nine-year-old child has died after being struck by a car driven by someone who was distracted by a cell phone. In one case a car with three boys in it was hit by a driver on a cell phone. In the other case, a little girl on a bike was hit by a distracted driver. In both cases, there is nothing but carelessness to blame for the children?s deaths.
9. Mother and Child See Father and Baby Die. Imagine that you are driving along in your car with one of your children while your husband is driving in a separate car with your other child. You?re probably planning to all head back home and make dinner. What happens instead is that your husband is talking on the phone, gets distracted while trying to end the call and ends up crashing the car, killing both himself and your two-year-old baby. That?s what happened in Abu Dhabi last year and it?s probably pretty safe to assume that the mother is still reeling from the accident.
10. Surviving Child Fights for Cell Phone Ban. Jacy Good has become ?the ?face? of a state House effort to ban hand-held cell phone use by drivers and to make text messaging while driving illegal? after she herself survived a horrible car accident caused by a driver who was distracted while using a mobile phone. Her story is just one of those tragic stories that is awfully good for evoking human emotion about issues like these. She had just graduated from college and her parents had picked up her and her belongings to bring her back home. They were on their way home with all of her stuff when the distracted driver hit the car and both parents were killed. Good suffered massive injuries (like a broken pelvis) and has now devoted her life to working on changing cell phone laws.
 

spartan

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2001
5,098
37
0
Long Island
The gunman was fired from his job last year and went back to have it out with one of his ex co-workers. Well he shot him 3 times and killed him. A construction worker saw him and followed him. He told the cops nearby to go after him and they confronted him. Well that's when the bullets started flying and innocent people started getting hit. The gunman was eventually killed.
Just another wild and crazy day in the big city :scared
 

Penguinfan

Thread banned
Forum Member
Dec 5, 2001
10,393
190
0
Vanished into vortex
Drugs are illegal and nobody does drugs, especially in NY so it stands to reason that if guns are outlawed then there would be no more cases of gun violence in this country.

Ruling a country is easy, I should be king.
 

spartan

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2001
5,098
37
0
Long Island
Drugs are illegal and nobody does drugs, especially in NY so it stands to reason that if guns are outlawed then there would be no more cases of gun violence in this country.

Ruling a country is easy, I should be king.

Go down to the lower east side in new york on any given night and see the drug use, alcoholic abuse, hookers everywhere. Dam I love new york give me more baby :mj07: :toast:
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,599
245
63
"the bunker"
WOW !

That's a blanket statement :facepalm:

Following your logic, or lack of it, anyone who believes in the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights are " FUCKING NUTS"

I teach and preach and drill into my children repeatedly !

THINK 3 STEPS AHEAD OF WHAT YOU ARE ABOUT TO SAY OR DO AND WHAT THE RAMIFICATIONS COULD BE

Seems to me that as an adult, allegedly, that thought process is something you are incapable of.

Why doctors are more dangerous than guns - new Health Ranger investigation video


Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036679_doctors_guns_fatalities.html#ixzz24Ts2
gMVd

I wonder if this makes "US Fire Arms Owners, Legally owned, "FUCKING NUTS" as well?

Third Amendment - Quartering Soldiers


[SIZE=+1] No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.[/SIZE]
3rd Amendment Annotations

There has been no Supreme Court explication of this Amendment, which was obviously one guarantee of the preference for the civilian over the military. 1
Footnotes
[Footnote 1] In fact, save for the curious case of Engblom v. Carey, 677 F. 2d 957 (2d Cir. 1982), on remand, 572 F. Supp. 44 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd. per curiam, 724 F.2d 28 (2d Cir. 1983), there has been no judicial explication at all.


Please,

make your best case for this analysis without any personal attacks, if you can.

whoa !....was getting ready to send the dogs out after your ass.....you take a wrong turn in the bomb shelter`s catacombs?....

welcome back,bud....:lol:
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
whoa !....was getting ready to send the dogs out after your ass.....you take a wrong turn in the bomb shelter`s catacombs?....

welcome back,bud....:lol:

Just digging the shelter a little deeper, with more reenforcement.

Crazy ex-wife issues, son hospitalized with lacerated kidney, just the usual fun in my mundane life.
 

Hashish

Smoked
Forum Member
Sep 5, 2006
8,085
107
0
Surf City
It seems the piggies are the ones who shot all the innocent bystanders. They fired 16 shots at the guy from 8 feet away and missed 9 times!! Nice shooting, Barneys!!
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
It seems the piggies are the ones who shot all the innocent bystanders. They fired 16 shots at the guy from 8 feet away and missed 9 times!! Nice shooting, Barneys!!

Should the NYPD be banned, restricted, let them only have 10 round clips?

Maybe more training? :0008

If it were for not the need to keep my firearm(s) clean, oiled and in proper working order, they would collect dust. They have stayed holstered, safety on.

This is my PRIMARY SAFETY !

8891667-silhouette-vector-finger-up-hand-on-white.jpg




Well.... they do see plenty of range time
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
Self-Defense & the Active Shooter?A Call to Action

Self-Defense & the Active Shooter?A Call to Action

Self-Defense & the Active Shooter?A Call to Action

An active shooter is an armed person who has used deadly physical force on other persons and continues to do so while having unrestricted access to additional victims.

?Sheriff?s Office Policy and Procedure Manual (El Paso County, Colorado)

[Tim Larkin comment: Chris and I purposely held this post during the aftermath of last month's tragedy in Colorado. But with a seemingly endless string of shootings... the latest near the Empire State Building in NYC just this morning... we'd like you to consider this message now, even if it's not what most want to hear.]
??

Article Continues.....http://www.targetfocustraining.com/selfdefense-active-shootera-call-action

Who is Tim Larkin?

Martial Arts Biography - Tim Larkin

US self-defence guru Tim Larkin barred from Britain

Tim Larkin, a US self-defence instructor who teaches pupils to "inflict crippling pain from injury to easily damaged body parts" has been barred from Britain where he was due to give seminars in areas hit by last year's riots.

Tim Larkin, who runs Target Focus Training and has been accused of promoting vigilantism, was turned back at the airport in Las Vegas on Tuesday with notice that he had been denied entry by British interior minister Theresa May.
He had been due to speak at the Martial Arts Show in Birmingham and give classes in areas including Tottenham in north London, where a rioting and looting broke out last August.


Mr Larkin's website says the core of Target Focus' philosophy is that "violence is rarely the answer, but when it is, it's the only answer".

It claims he has been teaching "elite military and law enforcement agencies in 58 countries" for 20 years.


In a statement, the Home Office said: "We can confirm that the individual in question is subject to an exclusion order.

Continues....

Related Articles


 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
This nation was conquered a long time ago.

Yes it was,

The commonly used expression, "Those who ignore history are bound (or doomed) to repeat it" is actually a mis-quotation of the original text written by George Santayana, who, in his Reason in Common Sense, The Life of Reason, Vol.1, wrote "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." Rooted in the philosophies of Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and many others to follow, his biography (1863-1952) and more contemporary intepretations and observations about man and life can be found at Wikipedia by searching for George Santayana. Stanford University online also provides an outstanding and much more detailed background on this important and profound philosopher, essayist, poet and novelist.

Santayana's quotation, in turn, was a slight modification of an Edmund Burke (1729-1797) statement, "Those who don't know history are destined to repeat it." Burke was a British Statesman and Philosopher who is generally viewed as the philosophical founder of modern political conservatism.

----------------------------------

Just to add to the above, a classic example is Hitler's invasion of Russia. Napoleon had done that, and Hitler made the same mistake, and suffered the same fate. On both occasions, the Russians simply retreated , drawing the enemy further and further into Russia in their advance, and then, when they Russian winter struck, and the invaders were unprepared and ill-equipped to deal with it, they were slaughtered in their thousands during their retreat.

The above example is too simplistic. Actually, Hitler was fully aware of Napleon's plight and had planned meticulously how not to fall into the same trap by using the new offensive technique of Blitzkreig (lightening strike). The plan was for Army Group North to take Leningrad, Army Group Centre to take Moscow and Army Group South to take Stalingrad and the Caucasus oilfields. All before the winter weather made mobility impossible.

The original start date for Operation Barbarossa was accordingly 15th May 1941 but Mussolini's failing invasion of Greece required German intervention to protect Operation Barbarossa's southern flank. German troops invaded Greece on April 6, 1941; Athens fell on 27 April and mainland Greece was fully occupied by mid-May.

Nevertheless, the six week campaign led to Operation Barbarossa being launched five and a half weeks later than planned, on 22 June. Weather (rain and mud at first before the snows) slowed the advance from early October onwards, meaning that the Blitzkreig part of the campaign was shortened from the planned 20 weeks, to just 14. How vital those six weeks would have been we will never know but whilst none of the main city objectives (Leningrad, Moscow and Stalingrad) were taken yet all three almost fell. After taking three million Russian soldiers captive during the advance, only 90,000 remained to defend Moscow by late 1941 for example.

Arguably it wasn't ignoring the lesson of history that was Hitler's fatal mistake, it was not adapting to changing circumstances.


Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Who_said_Those_who_ignore_history_are_bound_to_repeat_it#ixzz24fHeadi7
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top