Daily Caller Reporter Heckles President Obama During Immigration Remarks
video
by
Tommy Christopher | 2:32 pm, June 15th, 2012
? 12 comments<IFRAME style="MARGIN: 0px; WIDTH: 400px; HEIGHT: 24px; OVERFLOW: hidden" src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediaite.com%2Ftv%2Fdaily-caller-reporter-hectors-president-obama-during-immigration-remarks%2F&layout=standard&show-faces=false&width=525&action=like&font=arial&colorscheme=light" frameBorder=0 allowTransparency scrolling=no></IFRAME>
In a remarkable display of unprofessionalism,
Daily Caller reporter Neil Munro heckled President Obama as he delivered remarks in the White House?s Rose Garden regarding a
shift in immigration policy Friday afternoon. Munro?s angst is apparently connected to
comments the President made in March of 2011, in which he ruled out using an executive order to change immigration policy, even though no executive order
was used for the current policy change.
Munro, the video indicates, was attending the remarks with a temporary press pass.
The Daily Caller?s
Matt Lewis flagged this exchange earlier today, ostensibly to demonstrate a contradiction with today?s announcement of a policy change by the Department of Homeland Security:
MR. RAMOS: Mr. President, my question will be as follows: With an executive order, could you be able to stop deportations of the students? And if that?s so, that links to another of the questions that we have received through univision.com. We have received hundreds, thousand, all related to immigration and the students. Kay Tomar (ph) through univision.com told us ? I?m reading ? ?What if at least you grant temporary protective status, TPS, to undocumented students? If the answer is yes, when? And if no, why not??
THE PRESIDENT: Well, first of all, temporary protective status historically has been used for special circumstances where you have immigrants to this country who are fleeing persecution in their countries, or there is some emergency situation in their native land that required them to come to the United States. So it would not be appropriate to use that just for a particular group that came here primarily, for example, because they were looking for economic opportunity.
With respect to the notion that I can just suspend deportations through executive order, that?s just not the case, because there are laws on the books that Congress has passed ? and I know that everybody here at Bell is studying hard so you know that we?ve got three branches of government. Congress passes the law. The executive branch?s job is to enforce and implement those laws. And then the judiciary has to interpret the laws.
There are enough laws on the books by Congress that are very clear in terms of how we have to enforce our immigration system that for me to simply through executive order ignore those congressional mandates would not conform with my appropriate role as President.
However, the current policy change wasn?t effected by executive order, and appears to be consistent with what the President said next in that exchange:
That does not mean, though, that we can?t make decisions, for example, to emphasize enforcement on those who?ve engaged in criminal activity. It also doesn?t mean that we can?t strongly advocate and propose legislation that would change the law in order to make it more fair, more just, and ultimately would help young people who are here trying to do the right thing and whose talents we want to embrace in order to succeed as a country.
Looks like it wasn't a PLANT.
