Anyone else like the Under?

thom24ad

UDFlyers
Forum Member
Sep 29, 2005
2,124
0
0
46
Columbus, OH
I just played the under 33.5 for tonight's game...I know its low but with the bad weather I see both teams running the ball...two good defenses Balti (8.3 ppg) Denver (10.3 ppg)...Balt/Denver last two games have gone under the total along with the 4 out of last 5 games since 2000...Baltimore's last five games this season has gone under with one push...and Denver's last five games four have gone under with one over...is this one too obvious of a play?...what do you guys think?
 

GOLFSTUD

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 15, 2004
350
1
0
Ohio
Too obvious

Too obvious

For whatever reason, when 2 good defenses play the total seems to go over the majority of the time. I think the offenses know they have to open it up and the defenses either score themselves or set up short fields for easy scores.

I like OVER.
 

thom24ad

UDFlyers
Forum Member
Sep 29, 2005
2,124
0
0
46
Columbus, OH
its a catch-22...too obvious so the over is the play but then if the game goes under I'm kicking myself for not playing the obvious...I've been playing the obvious with my totals this year and its worked so far well except the Volts/Bulldog game...man that was a bad call...with my record this weekend the over is most likely the play:142smilie
 

GOLFSTUD

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 15, 2004
350
1
0
Ohio
Went down with ya

Went down with ya

I had the under on the Bulldogs too. How could we have been soooo wrong. Over the total by close to 50 points...wow.

good luck tonight
 

Taximike

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 2, 2002
504
4
0
56
Akron, Oh
wow, you mean to tell me there's more than one golf stud in NE Ohio???? Have you played Shale Creek yet golfstud???
 

thom24ad

UDFlyers
Forum Member
Sep 29, 2005
2,124
0
0
46
Columbus, OH
Whew!...I needed that one after a bad weekend...got a nice piece back tonight but the books still won...that was a good hard hitting game...
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top