April 14

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,050
137
63
Toronto
I blow chunks
(figuratively. fortunately. I think.)


g#1 rockies (if.Reyn@Dick) +123 1/1.23
marlins +122 1/1.22
cardinals +122 1/1.22


Jays, Leafs and Raptors all won't lose today.
Parlay that for easy money.


http://youtu.be/cpbbuaIA3Ds

Apparently my embed privileges have been expunged.

Hendrix bless us, everyone.
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,050
137
63
Toronto
Word on today's mistakes...

I have former 1st rounder Reynolds ranked a notch below Dickey at this point. G.R. may have some potential but not much seems apparent, but not such a big deal facing the not-to-match Wakefield quality of knuckleballer Dickey. Bullpens are a big mismatch, it seems, as Rox have been dealing great while Mets have been as bad as it gets. Gotta give an O edge to Roxsticks, as well, making the tag seem worthy. G#2, likely DLRosa v. Capuano also looks to favour the Rox, though price ain't as nice and it's yet to be seen who's in the lineup, what with the DH going down. Rox ain't hitting lefties well, so far, in limited, though Capuano will not see my money until I win the lottery or something else suprising happens.

Have the more seasoned Nolasco currently rated equivalent with the seemingly-great potentialed Beachy. BP looks to favour Braves but too early to tell, there. O appears to favour the fish, though I'm not expecting to be looking for many overs on their games all year, if yaknowhatimean. Nolasco's in decent form and he's quite streaky so, while it's early, it seems worth the shot for the price.

Garcia had a shit spring but you wouldn't know by his start and he's shown some solid work in the past. Kuroda is off to a great start, too, but he's faced fairly weak opponents in the Giants and Padres--the latter at majorly pitcher-friendly Petco. In 3 GS vs cards he's 0-1 but the 1.42 era and 19 K's in 19 IP makes one wonder about support. Neither BP has impressed, early on, and I'm just feeling that Garcia can certainly compete, here, while the cards O may finally be finding some form of a groove...same can't really be said of Dodgers, another team which will see me tackling few overs.


Mostly ticking away the moments.
Likely not helpful, or convincing.
Just where I'm at.

Fading my NHL appears a better prospect
though I'll pass today, Hendrix willing.

GL
 
Last edited:

Riskbreaker

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 19, 2002
1,608
2
0
47
krautland
heya EP
thanks for the kind words. no doubt you'll be golden come the end of this crapshoot. I'm just saving up on some bailout money for my annual interleague breakdown.

much to my surprise i had to google krautrock and - not to my surprise - only knew Kraftwerk out of a long list (who were krautrockers in their early years according to wikipedia)

you might dig some progrock. recommending Transatlantic, Spock's Beard and the usual suspects Dream Theater, who might have a larger following in Europe...

read your thread every day, guess we've grown out of the threadbumper age.

bol for the rest of the season buddy
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,050
137
63
Toronto
thanks for the words, Risky
good to see you're still around and still indulging

yeah...the tunes labelling is sorta borderline, as far as I'm concerned (everybody's talkin' 'bout the new sound, funny, cuz it's still rock n roll to me)
I guess it refers to some experimental or somewhat psychedelic stuff, often with long instrumental passages. Some Floyd stuff even borders on it. I'd more refer to bands like Camel, Popol Vuh, Eloy, Ash Ra Tempel, Guru Guru, Virus, Vespero, German Oak, Brainstorm, ad nauseam to allocate such pigeonholing. Recommend Los Natas, Beiruth, Taal (totally...esp. Mister Green) and even Charalambides as possible new takers of the mantle. Likely missing many others--old and new--but just really means some deeper, extravagent stuff, so you could almost put whatever I dig into that category. Think Pink, regardless.

Can I fucking carry on, or what?

just came by to add the irrelevant following...
have, for same:
rockies(g#1)51%(+123)+5
marfish51%(+122)+5
cardinal unrule55%(+122)+10

Looks like I should go more on the cards, aye?
These numbers--this early and maybe later--are as meaningless as gov't statistics.
At least that leaves me in the ballpark:box2: .
Just some quickies to give me indicae of where to peruse.
I'd give the rest but I see crappy value elsewhere, save maybe for rox in g#2, depending on circumstances. Astros almost.

Wish this shit would work for the NHL.
I semi-like the Sharks, g#1.
Somebody slap me.
 
Last edited:

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
8,050
137
63
Toronto
g#2 rockies -109 0.55/0.5

My confidence is akin to a stranger's handshake.
Regardless, prefer SP, BP and sticks so action jackson is likely not still alive and living in Peru.

IMO
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top