https://www.reuters.com/world/after-nato-biden-turns-eu-renewal-transatlantic-ties-2021-06-14/
He's overseas working to fix the relationships the last guy damaged. Keep getting your news from FB. It's a great look!
Arizona Ballot Recount
- Thread starter yyz
- Start date
https://www.reuters.com/world/after-nato-biden-turns-eu-renewal-transatlantic-ties-2021-06-14/
He's overseas working to fix the relationships the last guy damaged. Keep getting your news from FB. It's a great look!
In your unhumble opinion just what news sources may we trust? You have a pattern of only relying on the sources that document history without being critical of Biden. Wise up!
You have asked this before and I responded. Didn't work. The two sites below allow you to check outlets for yourself. Have at it.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/
https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/media-bias-ratings
The man is a SENILE MESS,
Biden ? ?I?m thrilled to meet your wife??.
<iframe width="450" height="350" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/aBv_V2VNY-s" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
:142smilie
Joe Biden Utterly Clueless at G7 Summit, Liberals on 100% Damage Control
<iframe width="738" height="415" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/WSu7xAyaxUQ" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
++++
<iframe width="738" height="415" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/WSu7xAyaxUQ" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
++++
When you have nothing go your way, just recycle your old garbage takes! "Joe Biden is senile!"
Nice video, Skullfuck. That guy seems like the kind of guy I would expect you to trust to feed you information. I'll bet he's very successful, just like you.
Nice video, Skullfuck. That guy seems like the kind of guy I would expect you to trust to feed you information. I'll bet he's very successful, just like you.
Let's use your favorite Liberal Media target versus one of your favorite sources. They point out that CNN loses credibility, not for their reporting, but for their TV pundits. Meanwhile, Trending Politics is essentially as factual as the CNN TV pundits but they like to dabble in conspiracy theories and propaganda. Then I posted Reuters, who I've been telling you is a great source for a couple years now.
<header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">[h=1]CNN[/h]</header><header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">[h=1]
<header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">[h=2]LEFT BIAS[/h]</header>These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
<center style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;"><amp-ad width="100vw" height="320" type="adsense" data-ad-client="ca-pub-6505602311060910" data-ad-slot="2554123025" data-auto-format="rspv" data-full-width="">
</amp-ad></center>
- Overall, we rate CNN left biased based on editorial positions that consistently favor the left, while straight news reporting falls left-center through bias by omission. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to several failed fact checks by TV hosts. However, news reporting on the website tends to be properly sourced with minimal failed fact checks
</header>[h=3]Detailed Report[/h][h=5]CNN Bias Rating: LEFT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: TV Station
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY[/h]<header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: 16px; line-height: inherit; font-family: Roboto; vertical-align: baseline; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">[h=1]Trending Politics[/h]</header><header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">[h=2]
[h=2]QUESTIONABLE SOURCE[/h]</header>A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
<center style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;"><amp-ad width="100vw" height="320" type="adsense" data-ad-client="ca-pub-6505602311060910" data-ad-slot="2554123025" data-auto-format="rspv" data-full-width="">
</amp-ad></center>
- Overall, we rate Trending Politics Right Biased and Questionable based on poor sourcing, promotion of propaganda, and conspiracy theories as well as several failed fact checks.
<header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">[h=1]Reuters[/h]</header><header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">[h=2]
[h=2]LEAST BIASED[/h]</header>These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biases sources.
<center style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;"><amp-ad width="100vw" height="320" type="adsense" data-ad-client="ca-pub-6505602311060910" data-ad-slot="2554123025" data-auto-format="rspv" data-full-width="">
</amp-ad></center>
- Overall, we rate Reuters Least Biased based on objective reporting and Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information with minimal bias and a clean fact check record.
[h=3]Detailed Report[/h]Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED
Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH
Country: United Kingdom (35/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: News Agency
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
<center style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;"><iframe id="google_ads_iframe_/124067137/mediabiasfactcheck728x90FS_3_0" title="3rd party ad content" name="google_ads_iframe_/124067137/mediabiasfactcheck728x90FS_3_0" width="1" height="1" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0" data-google-container-id="6" data-load-complete="true" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-width: 0px; border-style: initial; font: inherit; vertical-align: bottom; max-width: 100%; width: 728px; height: 90px;"></iframe>
</center>
Let's use your favorite Liberal Media target versus one of your favorite sources. They point out that CNN loses credibility, not for their reporting, but for their TV pundits. Meanwhile, Trending Politics is essentially as factual as the CNN TV pundits but they like to dabble in conspiracy theories and propaganda. Then I posted Reuters, who I've been telling you is a great source for a couple years now.
<header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">[h=1]CNN[/h]</header><header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">[h=1]
[/h]
<header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">[h=2]LEFT BIAS[/h]</header>These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.
<center style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;"><amp-ad width="100vw" height="320" type="adsense" data-ad-client="ca-pub-6505602311060910" data-ad-slot="2554123025" data-auto-format="rspv" data-full-width="">
</amp-ad></center>
- Overall, we rate CNN left biased based on editorial positions that consistently favor the left, while straight news reporting falls left-center through bias by omission. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to several failed fact checks by TV hosts. However, news reporting on the website tends to be properly sourced with minimal failed fact checks
</header>[h=3]Detailed Report[/h][h=5]CNN Bias Rating: LEFT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: TV Station
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY[/h]<header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: 16px; line-height: inherit; font-family: Roboto; vertical-align: baseline; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">[h=1]Trending Politics[/h]</header><header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">[h=2][/h]
[h=2]QUESTIONABLE SOURCE[/h]</header>A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
<center style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;"><amp-ad width="100vw" height="320" type="adsense" data-ad-client="ca-pub-6505602311060910" data-ad-slot="2554123025" data-auto-format="rspv" data-full-width="">
</amp-ad></center>
- Overall, we rate Trending Politics Right Biased and Questionable based on poor sourcing, promotion of propaganda, and conspiracy theories as well as several failed fact checks.
<header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">[h=1]Reuters[/h]</header><header class="entry-header" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;">[h=2]
[/h]
[h=2]LEAST BIASED[/h]</header>These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biases sources.
<center style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;"><amp-ad width="100vw" height="320" type="adsense" data-ad-client="ca-pub-6505602311060910" data-ad-slot="2554123025" data-auto-format="rspv" data-full-width="">
</amp-ad></center>
- Overall, we rate Reuters Least Biased based on objective reporting and Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information with minimal bias and a clean fact check record.
[h=3]Detailed Report[/h]Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED
Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH
Country: United Kingdom (35/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: News Agency
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
<center style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font: inherit; vertical-align: baseline;"><iframe id="google_ads_iframe_/124067137/mediabiasfactcheck728x90FS_3_0" title="3rd party ad content" name="google_ads_iframe_/124067137/mediabiasfactcheck728x90FS_3_0" width="1" height="1" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0" data-google-container-id="6" data-load-complete="true" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-width: 0px; border-style: initial; font: inherit; vertical-align: bottom; max-width: 100%; width: 728px; height: 90px;"></iframe>
</center>
Good luck.
Same mentality as "600,000 isn't as big of a deal as 6,000"
I guess you're back to name calling, I guess you know you're on the Wrong side of the conversation.
Again.
:0008
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">NOW - Biden apparently gets lost reading his notes at EU-US summit.<a href="https://t.co/gQ7VgKdTlD">pic.twitter.com/gQ7VgKdTlD</a></p>— Disclose.tv 🚨 (@disclosetv) <a href="https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1404806897677504533?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 15, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Raise your hand if you voted for this poor old man.
WTF is wrong with this man.
opcorn2
Raise your hand if you voted for this poor old man.
WTF is wrong with this man.
opcorn2
<iframe width="695" height="391" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/RB2OIq1H0SU" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>++++
I can't get by the speech impediment. Sorry. Maybe there is another Trumptard's video you can post instead.
