Arizona fires head football coach Mike Stoops

IE

Administrator
Forum Admin
Forum Member
Mar 15, 1999
95,440
223
63
The University of Arizona has fired head football coach Mike Stoops.
Athletic director Greg Byrne addressed the media at a news conference minutes after releasing a statement.

Defensive coordinator Tim Kish will take over as interim coach. Kish has been with Stoops at Arizona since the beginning, coaching in a variety of roles. Stoops named him co-coordinator in 2009 and he became sole coordinator this year.

Stoops was 41-50 in his eighth season at Arizona.

On Oct. 30, 2010, Arizona defeated UCLA 29-21 at the Rose Bowl to improve to 7-1. The next day, they climbed to 13th in the nation in the Associated Press poll.

Since that game, the Wildcats have lost 10 of 11 games, their only win coming against Northern Arizona on Sept. 3.

Here is the official release that the athletic department sent right at 6 p.m.:

&racuo; University of Arizona director of athletics Greg Byrne announced that Mike Stoops has been relieved of his duties and no longer will be head coach of the Arizona Football program. Byrne said that defensive coordinator Tim Kish will serve as the interim head coach for the remainder of the season.

Stoops was introduced as the 28th head coach in Arizona's 108-year football history in November 2004. He was able to re-establish respectability to a program that had slid to the bottom of the Pac-10 Conference before his arrival with a program-low 2-10 record in 2003.

Stoops' record in eight seasons at Arizona was 41-50, with a 27-38 mark in league games. Arizona currently is 1-5 in 2011 and 0-4 for last place in the Pac-12 South division. The Cats lost, 37-27, at Oregon State last Saturday, their eighth consecutive league loss. The Wildcats have lost 10 consecutive games against FBS opponents, winning their season opener against Northern Arizona this year and last beating a FBS team (UCLA) on Oct. 30, 2010.

Arizona has a bye this week before returning to play at home Thursday, Oct. 20, in an ESPN national cablecast against UCLA.

"We're appreciative of Mike's dedicated work for the Arizona Wildcats," Byrne said. "Coach Stoops had many successes as our head coach over the last eight seasons. It was a difficult decision but I feel now is the time for new leadership and direction."

Kish, 57, defensive coordinator throughout Stoops' tenure in Tucson said, "Today is tough day for the program. It's an important moment, for sure. I appreciate Greg's faith in me to provide leadership to our young men during this difficult time. I've been with Coach Stoops for each of his eight years here and know that we have a strong foundation for not only the future but for our immediate tasks. I know this coaching staff will work hard and support our players as we compete for the remainder of the season. We're here to help these players succeed."

Byrne said a search for Stoops' successor would begin immediately. "I expect the search to end sometime after the regular season is over," he said. "We will make the best decision for Arizona Football, and we are open to a variety of candidates, but the next time you will hear anything from me about this search will be when we introduce our new coach," he said.

Stoops, 49, guided the Wildcats to three straight bowl victories (2008-2010), which matches a school record for most consecutive postseason appearances (1992-94). In 2009, the Wildcats returned to the national rankings and remained in the polls for much of the 2010 season after a 7-1 start. Arizona peaked at No. 9 in the Associated Press poll following a 34-27 victory over then-No. 9 Iowa on Sept. 18, 2010.

The victory over the ranked Hawkeyes was the ninth such win over a nationally-ranked team by one of Stoops' teams. He defeated a ranked team in each of his first seven years at Arizona, and went 9-24 overall against ranks foes.

Prior to Stoops' arrival in Tucson, he was the associate head coach and defensive coordinator at Oklahoma, including during the 2000 season when the Sooners won the national championship. His coaching career began as a graduate assistant and assistant coach at Iowa where he spent six seasons. He then went on to coach seven seasons at Kansas State before moving on to Oklahoma and later Arizona for his first head coaching job.

Mike Stoops' coaching marks at Arizona:
2004: 3-8
2005: 3-8
2006: 6-6
2007: 5-7
2008: 8-5
2009: 8-5
2010: 7-6
2011: 1-5
Total: 41-50.
 

joz

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 29, 2005
3,397
9
0
new jersey
about time..... shoulda happened last year. He sure knows his defense....... look at the stats from the last few years :mj07: :mj07:
 

layinwood

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2001
4,771
40
0
Dallas, TX
I know his name comes up with every job search but Leach would be a good fit in the PAC. IMO that's where he has always wanted to be.

Two big problems with Leach. He doesn't like to mess with alumni so he doesn't do much in the money raising department. He's not a hard core recruiter. I think the recruiting could be taken care of by hiring great recruiting coordinators and assistants.
 

gjn23

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 20, 2002
9,319
45
48
55
So. Cal
Probably the happiest guy on this board.

He was a good recruiter though.

get in line behind me!

:toast:

his recruiting has stunk the last few years which is why you see a total lack of depth and talent on the defensive side of the ball right now......and special teams, i'm not sure i've ever seen a college-pro-high school team with such poor special teams as this years arizona

in one game....ONE GAME vs osu last week we had:

missed pat (again)
missed 30 yard fg
blocked punt by osu for a td
fake punt by osu for a first down
deep squib kick by osu to end half, not recovered by ua allowing osu 1 last play + fg to end half.

did i mention they were all in one game, i stand corrected....they were all in ONE FUKING HALF
 

Mr. Poon

Sugar?
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2006
13,160
209
0
Colorado
Yeah, he sure was terrible for the program following Mackovic and Tomey's last couple of years. Stoops was 41-50 and 27-38 in his 7.5 years there.

In the 7 seasons prior to his arrival the Wildcats were 41-42 and 21-35 in conference. That stretch includes Zona's best season of '98 when they went 12-1 and finished 4th in the polls.
 

gjn23

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 20, 2002
9,319
45
48
55
So. Cal
Yeah, he sure was terrible for the program following Mackovic and Tomey's last couple of years. Stoops was 41-50 and 27-38 in his 7.5 years there.

In the 7 seasons prior to his arrival the Wildcats were 41-42 and 21-35 in conference. That stretch includes Zona's best season of '98 when they went 12-1 and finished 4th in the polls.

that stretch also includes arizona's 3 worst seasons in forever thanks to john mackovic.....take that stretch out and then review the numbers

stoops was an average coach who was a "defensive specialist"....want to guess what arizona's defensive numbers in year 8 are, when all his guys should be in place (here's a hint, drop to the bottom of every statistical category and you'll find arizona)

he did some good things, brought the program back, but never could get the signature program changing win to get over the top....10 straight losses to bcs schools (1-9 ats in that span and none of the losses were really ats close despite getting dd in half those games) it was clearly time for him to go.
 

Mr. Poon

Sugar?
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2006
13,160
209
0
Colorado
The point went over your head. I was highlighting Mackovic's tenure. If you are excluding anything, it might as well be that 12-1 year. With that taken out, Tomey was a .500 coach his last handful of years.

Stoops never had the Wildcats finish a season ranked, but that is more of the norm for Arizona over the last 30 years.
 

gjn23

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 20, 2002
9,319
45
48
55
So. Cal
The point went over your head. I was highlighting Mackovic's tenure. If you are excluding anything, it might as well be that 12-1 year. With that taken out, Tomey was a .500 coach his last handful of years.

Stoops never had the Wildcats finish a season ranked, but that is more of the norm for Arizona over the last 30 years.

guess i dont see your point

so the program has been "average" over the last 30 years and this guy had 8 years to prove that he is...."average" so let's keeps him (esp after 10 straight losses to bcs schools)???

tomey's best years blew away stoops best years as stoops never lost less than 5 games....FIVE....in one season....tomey's time was up and stoops time was up....time to move on.
 

Mr. Poon

Sugar?
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2006
13,160
209
0
Colorado
My point is that you guys are railing on Stoops when he wasn't much different than his predecessors. Tomey had a couple of good years but wasn?t a godsend. Tomey had at least 5 losses in 8 of his 14 years. And Zona was in much better shape from what Larry Smith left it for Tomey than Mackovic did for Stoops.

As you said, Stoops did some good things. Did he get them to an elite or ranked level, no. But he did raise the program from a pretty low level.
 

gjn23

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 20, 2002
9,319
45
48
55
So. Cal
My point is that you guys are railing on Stoops when he wasn't much different than his predecessors. Tomey had a couple of good years but wasn?t a godsend. Tomey had at least 5 losses in 8 of his 14 years. And Zona was in much better shape from what Larry Smith left it for Tomey than Mackovic did for Stoops.

As you said, Stoops did some good things. Did he get them to an elite or ranked level, no. But he did raise the program from a pretty low level.

tomey was 8-14 in 5 loss seasons
stoops was 8-8 in 5 loss seasons

time for him to go

stoops took the program from the shithouse that makovic turned it into and brought it to a respectable level, but really not above where it ever was....and he was given 8 years. the recruiting has tailed off the last few years and his defense and special teams are beyond horrible.

thanks for what he did, but his time was clearly up.
maybe the next hire can take the program to a higher level (maybe not) but it was time to find that next person.
 

jhawksoon

Registered User
Forum Member
May 1, 2005
978
28
0
The Heartland
tomey was 8-14 in 5 loss seasons
stoops was 8-8 in 5 loss seasons

time for him to go

stoops took the program from the shithouse that makovic turned it into and brought it to a respectable level, but really not above where it ever was....and he was given 8 years. the recruiting has tailed off the last few years and his defense and special teams are beyond horrible.

thanks for what he did, but his time was clearly up.
maybe the next hire can take the program to a higher level (maybe not) but it was time to find that next person.

Not saying that he should have been kept on, but when people compare records from today's game and yesterday's, they always forget that there is an extra game and sometimes two. Not only do you get an extra regular season game, but there are so many bowl games now that you can play .500 ball and get an extra game in the bowl. So goes when people think of 10 win seasons. Much easier today than in the years past. Good fire if they get Leach, otherwise we will have to see. If I were Arizona I would have Leach in to visit on the bye week and hire him the next day. He could immediately help with recruiting his type of guys for next year and start to implement his offense. If he wants the job, that is.
 

layinwood

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2001
4,771
40
0
Dallas, TX
I was suprised it took this long. IMO you can see how a guy is really going to do by the end of his 4th year. Even without his own players you can see what a coach can do as far as coaching the kids and getting them to play. You give him 4 years to get his recruits in and to me that should show you how he will do. I'm not saying by the 4th year someone should be winning it all but they should be headed in the right direction and that includes both winning on the field and in the homes of these young recruits.


I don't think Leach will ever win it all because he doesn't believe D is very important but he will make things exciting, get them in the top10 here and there and maybe with a couple of special players make a run at the conference title. I'm not sure there are many coaches you can get that can do more for you. If you do, then it's more than likely they'll be getting offers from bigger programs and bigger pay.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top