It strikes me that the real irony in all of this - especially with the Auto bailouts - is that these same industry leaders are the first to cry out in support of free market economics, and the hardships they face with paying such high taxes to do business in their states and in this country.
Immediately when the free market works, and people don't buy their cars, they jet in and ask for tax money to help them continue to run their business and complain about showing how their plans to better compete in the free market are worthy of receiving our tax dollars.
Nothing is mentioned about the recent real winners - the oil companies - who for years have spent millions lobbying both the government and the automakers to avoid any mileage standards, and most likely safety standard, which helps who? Nobody but the oil companies and their investors.
I would agree that in many instances, the union situation these companies face is a big problem in staying competitive. But conservatives scream about the unions busting these companies, and see no problem in a CEO making $10,000 an hour from the company, nor managing these companies in a manner that would produce a product that can compete in a free market. The union workers don't tell the companies what to produce. They don't have much say in making the product viable and competitive to consumers.
There's plenty of blame to go around, but the irony is pretty, well, ironic.