Baseball's List of Deadbeats

Nolan Dalla

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2000
1,201
2
0
Washington, DC/Las Vegas, NV
Okay, I know its early in the season, and I'm setting myself up for a fall here. But, it's time to take a look at the list of MLB Deadbeats. This is patterned after the NBA Deadbeats list. Feel free to make corrections and add comments.

THE LIST OF MLB DEADBEATS

1. Detroit Tigers -- Any argument here? This deadbeat team is averaging just 1 measely run per game and 4 hits per game after the first week of the season. It's appalling that these jokers are actually collecting paychecks. This has been one of baseball worst franchises for nearly a decade, and the future looks even worse. This is an awful team that is an embarassment to baseball and the City of Detroit. On second thought, having been to Detroit once, I take that back. This team fits the city perfectly. First place in the raffle: A free three-day trip to Detroit. Second-place: A WEEK in Detroit. Third-place: A house in Detroit. Fourth-place: Tiger's season tickets Fifth place: Lion's season tickets

2. Milwaukee Brewers -- Good baseball town and terrific sports fan base, but a terrible franchise. Like the crosstown Bucks in the NBA, this Milwuakee-based team has no heart and no pride. I hear the front entrance to the Milwaukee bullpen has one of those revolving doors, where the next softball pitcher can make his couple of appearances, then get shuffled back down to the minors in Pawtucket. When they put the player's last name on the back of the jersey, it's with velcro.

3. Texas Rangers -- Except for Rodriguez and Palmeiro (one of the most underrated first basemen of all time), this team is a joke that's about as stale as a Milton Berle routine. They seem to produce the bulk of runs in game when they already have a multi-run cushion versus some dreg in a major league uniform who should be holding a mop instead of a ball, yet often struggle against decent starters. The pitching staff is horrendous. No lead is safe with this team. The worst team of all-time might be the Rangers starters and bull pen over the last three seasons, combined with a collection of Brewers and Tigers, then throw in the manager of the old Seattle Pilots as the zinger. That would be a AAA ballclub, at best. What on God's earth ws Buck Showalter thinking when he accepted a job with this sorry-assed franchise, with no playoff series wins in their entire 31-year history? Jesus man, couldn't you wait until that wonderful job opportunity opens up in Boston about mid-season?

3. Atlanta Braves -- Okay, I know they make the playoffs every single year. But for this franchise to have just one World Series title under their belt with the roster of players they've had in the lineup, which includes one of the best starting rotations of all-time, I call that a major league underacheivement. Plus, any team with grown man who still goes by the name "CHIPPER" as an adult has to make me wonder.

4. NY Mets -- A few years ago, the Baltimore Orioles would have been tagged in this spot, a grossly overpaid and underachieving virus of slobs who waver around the .500 mark and who mentally jerk off every Cannolli-eating dock worker in Queens for five full months out of the year. Favorite Shea Stadium moment: A man brings his two small kids to a Mets game a few years ago, and feels a mist starting to come down on his head. Oddly enough, there is not a cloud in the sky. Then, he sees a deranged fan in the upper deck of the stadium pissing off the rail down to the seats below. Nice work. Too bad the drunk couldn't hit the dugout.

5. Baseball Writers -- Any idiot sportswriter who didn't vote for Alex Rodriquez for MVP last season should be forced to watch all the Tiger's and Brewers games this season, without developing acohol dependency. All Rodriquez did was hit 57 HRs (ML leader), 147 RBIs (ML leader), and hit .300. If those aren't MVP numbers, I don't know what is. Total idiots. The crime of the decade, if you don't count Eminem's Oscar.

HONORABLE MENTION:
-- Chicago Cubs (90 years of misery)
-- Boston Red Sox (why New Englanders get so wrapped up in this joke of a team every season is beyond my comprehension)
-- Chicago White Sox (haven't done a damn thing since Veeck was boss)
-- LA Dodgers (ridiculously high payroll, nothing but disappointment to show for it....gotta' love the Angles now becoming LA's team)


THE GOOD GUYS:

1. Montreal Expos -- This poor downtrodden franchise is like a ship at sea without a port. But man for man, they still play hard in most games and come to play every night. Interesting that it's probably more exciting for Expos to play on the road, since they actually have fans in the seats at the games. Every sports fan should be rooting for this team.

2. Oakland Athletics -- This team can do it all -- good pitching, solid hitting, and is capable of getting on a roll at any moment. Witness their record winning streak last season and rocket start so far this year.

3. NY Yankees -- I can't stand this team and think they have tremendous competitive advantages over the other teams, but you have to put them here because they do perform up to standards every season.

4. Minnesota Twins -- No question, this team belongs, perhaps in the top spot. While the morons who run baseball wanted to dissolve this proud franchise, all Minnesota did was win their division last season and it appears they will contend this season, as well. Dream World Series -- Montreal (NL) versus Minnesota (AL).

5. St. Louis -- Always competitive, good team balance, excellent tradition, good baseball city.


HONORABLE MENTION:
-- Anaheim Angels (probably should be on the list -- all they did was win the World Series last year)
-- Seattle Mariners (plays in tough division -- always gives good effort)
-- Houston Astros (always a darkhorse with an interesting mix of hitting and pitching talent)

-- Nolan Dalla
 
Last edited:

Pgh Kid

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2002
1,266
0
0
Pittsburgh
If your looking for value , Go against ATL and go with Pitt this year.Take Over in Pitt games.They added Offense this year
 

shamrock

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 12, 2001
8,459
532
113
Boston, MA
Nolan, always enjoyed your stuff, but as a Life Long Red Sox fan, must take objection to your stance. Of course any disagreement regarding the Boston franchise can end with 1918, to which I really can't defend, this is and has been a good competitive team over the years.
They won 93 games last year, with Damon, Ramirez, Nomar, Pedro, Lowe etc. they have a exciting respectable lineup again this season. Admittedly their bp will have problems, and they should have kept Urbina, but definitely they will be competitive.

As you know, they have the smallest ballpark in MLB, and always unlike several franchises they do spend money, (96 million payroll) this season. As you correctly mentioned New York & King George have a gigantic competitive advantage, no team in any sport has this hurt more than the Red Sox. However virtually every year since 67' they have been more than competitive.
 

shamrock

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 12, 2001
8,459
532
113
Boston, MA
sorry accidentally posted continued.

Maybe I'm looking through Red colored glasses, however I see that Boston franchise much like you described St. Louis (always competitive, good team balance, great baseball tradition, excellent MLB city). again maybe I'm not very objective:shrug:

other than last seasons exciting energetic title performance by Anaheim, what do the Angels, Houston, Seattle historically hold over Boston?? Further....lumping my Sox in with Detroit Milwaukee Tampa and some of these other pitiful franchises seems criminal.

Best
shamrock
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
nolan:
i think your list is right on the money, save for only a few teams. i think its a little premature to put the angels on the "good guys" list. if one world series title gets you on the list- then i guess the florida marlins would be considered good guys too. how the angels respond to their "lightning strike of success" in the next year or two will be a good indicator of their "worthiness" of being considered for your list.

shamrock:
gotta be honest- i mean no disrespect by it at all, but youre definitely looking through red-colored glasses. red sox are perennial underachievers, and it never ceases to amaze me how absurdly loyal red sox fans are. i think thats both a GREAT thing and a BAD thing (being that loyal). i always get a good kick out of talking to people from boston who now live here in cleveland. i admire their loyalty, but its just funny how they HONESTLY believe that "this is THEIR YEAR !!!"

"man the red sox are goin all the way! no-MAAAHH baby!"
"celtics are gonna win it all this year, green and white all the way"
"bruins gonna bring home the cup!"
"patriots gonna go 16-0"

no matter what the team's current state is (as far as talent or whatever), i honestly believe boston fans think their team is LOADED and its "championship or bust". and unfortunately, boston has been rollin the dice and crappin out with regularity
:D

(at least in cleveland, we never get our expectations too high)
 

cooz3

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2002
6,026
2
0
boston
at least boston fans are consistent ..lol...

but the philosophy of this franchise is flawed and has been for years..offense first defense/pitching last....and no one seems to get that here....im a sox fan but thats my perspective...they will be entertaining and win thier share...because some temas are just down right pathetic...but wont get over the hump...

as far as a deadbeat team...well i dont know...whats a dead beat team?....so a team like the angels who have had one good year in say 10 years is now a good franchise?..they won the world series..hats off to them ..great year...but you cant tell me thier franchise or team rather is more competitive than the redsox every year...so a team that makes a run..has a good year wins a championship..then is chit for 10 years until they make another run is not a "deadbeat" team?

i dont know how you can consider atlanta a deadbeat team...how many division titles have they won?...how many world series have they been in?..in last 10 years or so?....quality product ...just some bad luck ..bad breaks....but they were always right there in any championship discussion...dont see them on this list IMO

but good discussion nonetheless

cooz
 

british bulldog

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 5, 2002
695
1
0
63
England, u.k.
Nolan

Here are my brief thoughts and I played every one of these UNDER the total games won on props at start of season for ?500.


Not much to say on the following three because each is clueless when it comes to the diamond.

TAMPA

MILWAUKEE

DETROIT

For my fourth selection I was going to have ?1000, because as you said their rotation was once the best five (as in strength) yet they could not win the World Series in those five years. It is of course the BRAVES. This is what I had to say on another site recentlty.

Atlanta - The Brave's in my opinion will struggle to make the play-offs. Why? Because Atlanta has some very big question marks with their pitching staff. They lost Kevin Millwood and Tom Glavine from their starting rotation AND their bullpen took a hit losing great middle relief guys Remingler, Hammond, Lightenberg, & young prospect Spoonybauer. When you lose that kind of talent from your pitching staff it is hard not to notice it. Granted the Braves added Mike Hampton, Russ Ortiz, and Paul Byrd to their starting rotation but those guys aren't give me's. Greg Maddux will need some help. The Braves still have Smoltz in the bullpen as their closer but their middle relief guys leave a lot of unanswered questions. Offensively, Furcal will be solid again leading off and the 3-5 spots are great with Sheffield and the Jone's boys, but who else in this lineup will produce runs?

This is enough said and the line was 91 wins. This side will struggle for a .500 season.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top