BASES MONDAY

[THUNDER]

6/9/2014 7:05 PM MLB Baseball 911 Minnesota Twins/Toronto Blue Jays* Over 9 -125 4%
R Nolasco - R Listed R Dickey - R Listed

6/9/2014 10:15 PM MLB Baseball 908 San Francisco Giants* -? +155 3% vs Washington Nationals for 1st 5 Innings
S Strasburg - R Listed R Vogelsong - R Listed

6/9/2014 8:10 PM MLB Baseball 918 Chicago White Sox* -? +140 3% vs Detroit Tigers for 1st 5 Innings
R Porcello - R Listed H Noesi - R Listed

6/9/2014 7:00 PM College Baseball 244 Virginia (Game 3)* -2? +100 3% vs Maryland (Game 3)
Fixed Price

6/9/2014 7:00 PM College Baseball 246 UL Lafayette (Game 3)* -1? +145 3% vs Mississippi (Game 3)
Fixed Price

 

[hammer1]

*** A Question *******

*** A Question *******

Could you expound on why you seem to play 1st 5 inn and not 9 inn games ? Thanks

 

[devil dave]

agreed.

 

[pghpounder]

Could you expound on why you seem to play 1st 5 inn and not 9 inn games ? Thanks

I can't and am not answering for thunder.
If I play first 5 innings it's Because I'm playing the starting pitcher more than anything. To me I'm trying to take out the bullpens blowing games like they do so often as most starters go at least 5 innings now a days.
I also read somewhere that the most scoring in games is done in the 1st and 6th innings. Never tracked it myself.
Anyone have anything on that?

 

[hammer1]

I can't and am not answering for thunder.
If I play first 5 innings it's Because I'm playing the starting pitcher more than anything. To me I'm trying to take out the bullpens blowing games like they do so often as most starters go at least 5 innings now a days.
I also read somewhere that the most scoring in games is done in the 1st and 6th innings. Never tracked it myself.
Anyone have anything on that?

Ok....Wonder what the win rate dif is for pitchers 1st 5 vs whole 9 inn....

A good team will bail out a bad start by a good pitcher.........just my 2 cents

 

[THUNDER]

Ok....Wonder what the win rate dif is for pitchers 1st 5 vs whole 9 inn....

A good team will bail out a bad start by a good pitcher.........just my 2 cents

THANX FOR THE INPUT - I PLAY A TON OF FIRST 5 AT +140 AND ABOVE- THERE ARE ONLY 9 GOOD PENS IN BASEBALL BY THE WAY

 

[THUNDER]

1 Washington 59 11 9 2.17 12 0 0 187.0 -- 45 55 67 181 .221
2 San Francisco 62 17 5 2.39 23 0 0 192.1 -- 51 54 53 153 .211
3 San Diego 62 9 4 2.42 19 0 0 212.0 -- 57 63 69 205 .209
4 Oakland 61 13 10 2.63 13 0 0 192.0 -- 56 57 58 167 .214
5 Seattle 61 7 10 2.81 18 0 0 172.2 -- 54 59 76 173 .225
6 Pittsburgh 62 16 7 2.89 19 0 0 202.1 -- 65 69 76 170 .232
7 Boston 61 9 11 2.94 14 0 0 195.2 -- 64 70 65 180 .246
8 Cleveland 62 14 8 3.09 18 0 0 201.0 -- 69 87 86 201 .224
9 Chicago Cubs 60 6 13 3.28 11 0 0 189.1 -- 69 79 75 175 .221
10 Atlanta 58 12 8 3.35 20 0 0 158.2 -- 59 63 60 173 .247
11 Milwaukee 63 12 9 3.48 20 0 0 183.2 -- 71 75 65 185 .250

 

[hammer1]

1 Washington 59 11 9 2.17 12 0 187.0 -- 45 55 67 181 .221
2 San Francisco 62 17 5 2.39 23 0 192.1 -- 51 54 53 153 .211
3 San Diego 62 9 4 2.42 19 0 0 212.0 -- 57 63 69 205 .209
4 Oakland 61 13 10 2.63 13 0 0 192.0 -- 56 57 58 167 .214
5 Seattle 61 7 10 2.81 18 0 0 172.2 -- 54 59 76 173 .225
6 Pittsburgh 62 16 7 2.89 19 0 0 202.1 -- 65 69 76 170 .232
7 Boston 61 9 11 2.94 14 0 0 195.2 -- 64 70 65 180 .246
8 Cleveland 62 14 8 3.09 18 0 0 201.0 -- 69 87 86 201 .224
9 Chicago Cubs 60 6 13 3.28 11 0 189.1 -- 69 79 75 175 .221
10 Atlanta 58 12 8 3.35 20 0 0 158.2 -- 59 63 60 173 .247
11 Milwaukee 63 12 9 3.48 20 0 0 183.2 -- 71 75 65 185 .250

Always learnin' so what does it all mean ????

 

[THUNDER]

STATS FOR THE PENS - PROBLEM IS 2 OF THOSE GOOD NUMBERS ARE INFLATED BECAUSE OF LONG RELIEVERS THAT SHORE UP THE NUMBERS- PENS ARE PATHETIC THIS YEAR - ESPECIALLY CLOSERS THERE ARNT ANY-

 

[yanno]

STATS FOR THE PENS - PROBLEM IS 2 OF THOSE GOOD NUMBERS ARE INFLATED BECAUSE OF LONG RELIEVERS THAT SHORE UP THE NUMBERS- PENS ARE PATHETIC THIS YEAR - ESPECIALLY CLOSERS THERE ARNT ANY-

Not wanting to be a homer, Thunder, but I always have a very comfy feeling when Casey Janssen comes in for the Jays. Their pen was out of sorts when he was out at the start, but things have been falling into place. For what it's worth...just trying to give local input. As a bettor or a fan, I have NO Problem with the BP this year.

:0008

 

[cagex]

Not wanting to be a homer, Thunder, but I always have a very comfy feeling when Casey Janssen comes in for the Jays. Their pen was out of sorts when he was out at the start, but things have been falling into place. For what it's worth...just trying to give local input. As a bettor or a fan, I have NO Problem with the BP this year.

:0008

Not to be a hero or anything yanno. But I just tuned into MLB TV and janssen just gave up two. But at the same time... those were fielding errors. We can't do anything about those.

 

[yanno]

Not to be a hero or anything yanno. But I just tuned into MLB TV and janssen just gave up two. But at the same time... those were fielding errors. We can't do anything about those.

Gotcha, cagex. I am not trying to be a fan, but looking at the Jays BP. When Dickey left with the bases loaded and one out, Mcgowan came in and got the double play.

I guess I'm just saying that from the point of view of sports bettors, you have to handicap the BPs, and the Jays have a good one this year, as well as last. Just something to keep in mind.

Let's make money!!! :0008

By the way, Janssen has saved 45 of 49 games since 2013, according to some commentators. Or something like that.

 

[cagex]

Gotcha, cagex. I am not trying to be a fan, but looking at the Jays BP. When Dickey left with the bases loaded and one out, Mcgowan came in and got the double play.

I guess I'm just saying that from the point of view of sports bettors, you have to handicap the BPs, and the Jays have a good one this year, as well as last. Just something to keep in mind.

Let's make money!!! :0008

agreed.

sorry for taking over your thread jeff