beginning to see the light

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
After BBC's and the Guardian--UK's liberal media--have dissed our Patriot Act appears 90% of population don't see it that way anymore.
Kind of reminds me of the New Yorkers all flying flags and getting patriotic after 911---What happened to the politically correct BS now ;)

"News of the breakthrough comes as a Times poll conducted in the aftermath of the bombings indicates that an overwhelming majority of the British public favours a tough approach to terrorist suspects. Almost 90 per cent of people want the police to be given new powers to arrest people suspected of planning terrorist acts, tighter immigration controls and strict baggage inspections."

----however as with liberal media in U.S. some will still propagate their PC views despite the people--

BBC edits out the word terrorist
By Tom Leonard
(Filed: 12/07/2005)

The BBC has re-edited some of its coverage of the London Underground and bus bombings to avoid labelling the perpetrators as "terrorists", it was disclosed yesterday.



Early reporting of the attacks on the BBC's website spoke of terrorists but the same coverage was changed to describe the attackers simply as "bombers".
:mj10:
 
Last edited:

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,910
135
63
16
L.A.
I've never had a problem with most aspects of the Patriot Act, I think there should be profiling (until a little old Chinese lady bombs anything anyway ....made me feel so stupid at the airport when my scraggly unshaven mug carrying a backpack onto the airplane is waved through while poor little old Miss Ling is damn near strip searched in front of everyone...WTF?)

Anyway, DTB - you really could make your point better here without falling onto your obsession with L word media. That little paintbrushed assumption about the US media and PC garbage ....just leave it out man.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
smurphy said:
Anyway, DTB - you really could make your point better here without falling onto your obsession with L word media. That little paintbrushed assumption about the US media and PC garbage ....just leave it out man.
................................................................

maybe he should change the L word to bomber.
 

smurphy

cartographer
Channel Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,910
135
63
16
L.A.
who cares about that wording? everyone knows who they are referring to. why so bent out of shape over something like that? it's not like they AREN'T bombers. call em whatever, who cares.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Sounds like these guys were home grown what ever you wish to call them. Remember our Oklahoma City boys. Bombers or Terrorist. Seems both are bad. Insurgents is a different story.
Point is doing Iraq seems to have made no one any safer as they would like us to believe. In-fact they now believe there are more terrorist since we invaded Iraq.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
" In-fact they now believe there are more terrorist since we invaded Iraq"

Maybe you elaborate on who "they" are (without using the L word) ;)


I know one thing for sure--the terrorist aren't any safer--and I believe the other "they" might be changing opinion in the Muslim world----

Muslim Support for Bin Laden Falls, Poll Says

Thursday, July 14, 2005



WASHINGTON ? People in several heavily Muslim countries have lost some of their enthusiasm for Usama bin Laden (search) and for violent acts like terror bombings, especially in countries where there have been recent terrorist acts, international polling found.

Surveys conducted for the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press looked at attitudes of people living in Indonesia, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Pakistan and Turkey, all countries with Muslim majorities, as part of an international survey of 17 countries done this spring.

In Lebanon (search), the number of people who think the use of bombings and other forms of violence is justified in defense of Islam (search) has dropped from 73 percent in the summer of 2002 to 39 percent now. A decrease in this number also was seen in Morocco, which fell from 40 percent a year ago to 13 percent now, and in Pakistan and Indonesia. In Jordan, the number of people who feel such violence is justified has grown slightly; the number in Turkey remains very low.

Since March 2004, the sentiment for bombings against Americans and their allies in Iraq dropped from 70 percent to 49 percent in Jordan, which neighbors Iraq, and dropped by smaller margins in Pakistan, Turkey and Morocco.

The polling was done before the terrorist bombings in London last week.

Public confidence in bin Laden has dipped sharply since May 2003 in Indonesia, Morocco, Lebanon and Turkey ? all countries that have experienced recent terrorist bombings. In Pakistan and Jordan, a majority of people continue to say they have at least some confidence in bin Laden, the Saudi who leads Al Qaeda.

"Support for Usama bin Laden is waning, but there are still people who admire him and view him as a hero," said Ulil Abshor Abdala, chairman of the Islamic Liberal Network, a non-governmental organization in Indonesia that supports religious moderation and interfaith harmony.

"For some youth Usama Bin Laden is like Che Guevera, it does not matter what you say, he is a hero to them. Our challenge is how to limit the extent of this heroic admiration among the youth," Abdala said.

The United States remains broadly unpopular in those heavily Muslim countries. Solid majorities of the people in Lebanon, Pakistan, Turkey, Jordan and Indonesia have an unfavorable view of the United States, while Moroccans are split. Young people in Morocco, Lebanon, Pakistan and Turkey view America more favorably than the overall populations in those countries, the polling found.

Reasons for Islamic extremism varied from one majority-Muslim country to the next. Poverty and a lack of jobs were mentioned most often in some countries, while U.S. policies and influence were mentioned in others. Lack of education, immorality and lawlessness also were cited.

"The concern about the causes of extremism are varied," said Wendy Sherman, who was counselor for the State Department in the Clinton administration. "When the U.S. government looks at our counterterrorism efforts, we clearly have to use a variety of approaches."

The surveys found that public acceptance is growing in some majority-Muslim countries that democracy is not strictly a Western way of doing things but could work in their countries. In Lebanon, Jordan, Morocco and Indonesia, increasing numbers of people feel that democracy can work there.

The Pew survey found some conflicting feelings about Islam in majority-Muslim countries.

In all of those countries except Jordan, people were more likely to say Islam is playing a greater role in their countries than it did a few years ago. The increasing role of Islam was overwhelmingly seen as a positive development in all those countries except Turkey. Respondents said growing immorality, government corruption and concerns about Western influence were among their reasons for turning to Islam.

A majority of people in Morocco and Pakistan say Islamic extremism greatly threatens their country, and almost half in Indonesia and Turkey said it poses a great threat. Few people in Lebanon and Jordan felt that way.

Muslims in Turkey, Pakistan, Jordan and Morocco say they think of themselves first as Muslims, then as citizens of their country. Muslims in Lebanon and Indonesia were divided on how they think of themselves first.

The polls were taken in various countries from late April to the end of May with samples of about 1,000 in most countries and slightly fewer than 1,000 in the European countries. The margin of sampling error ranged from 2 percentage points to 4 percentage points, depending on the sample size.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
I agree polls are showing a swing. They should after all these folks blow up there own kind as much as anyone else. Forsure in Iraq. Yet there continues to be these bombings all over the place. Our war in Iraq will not stop these. Why this adminastration thinks it will I cant undestand. Seems those doing the bombing in Iraq get low numbers. But when doing it in other contries it does not seem the numbers are as low. And if we don't stop the flow of money through Suadi. It shall continue. As to the main point here. Bombers or Terroist. They seem to be very much the same. They both create terror and death.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,485
161
63
Bowling Green Ky
I agree DJV war in Iraq won't stop terrorist bombers there or anywhere in world--never did before war and won't afterward.

Only places safe from Islamic terrorist are those that have no muslim population. Sad but true.
 

Palehose

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 22, 2005
590
1
0
djv said:
I agree polls are showing a swing. They should after all these folks blow up there own kind as much as anyone else. Forsure in Iraq. Yet there continues to be these bombings all over the place. Our war in Iraq will not stop these. Why this adminastration thinks it will I cant undestand. Seems those doing the bombing in Iraq get low numbers. But when doing it in other contries it does not seem the numbers are as low. And if we don't stop the flow of money through Suadi. It shall continue. As to the main point here. Bombers or Terroist. They seem to be very much the same. They both create terror and death.

I Believe it can help tremendously in the long run. The part nobody will speak about of course in this lovely world of PC is the religious aspects of this war that has been going on for what 1400 years now ?

The problem I see is that as long as their are Muslum clerics running the governments of these non- secular Muslum states there will always be a tremendous amount of terroism . Although Iraq was not a Muslum state it is a great place to start . It was ripe for a democracy and so is Iran .

I believe democracy is not perfect but by far and away the best governemnt to date . I just see it as the fairest possible form of government.

Imagine if the Catholic priests in the US were the only people who could make a law ? OMG I could hear the cries from the left just thinking of such an atrocity .

My point is.... if the people decide their own leaders and the people make their own laws and become secular, not only will this put a huge dent in terrorism from radical Muslums but we will also get help from these country's to stamp it out .
as things are right now these clerics preach hate of the west to these people from infancy to adulthood and these people arent even allowed to believe diferently . This in turn creates a certian percent be it as low as 2% to as high as 10% that are willing to violently act out IE: suicide bombers .

Just my 2 cents !
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
Palehose said:
Although Iraq was not a Muslum state it is a great place to start . It was ripe for a democracy and so is Iran .
!

Ripe for democracy, huh?

Great place to start even though it's not a Muslim state?

Iran as well? Ripe?

Yeah, I think North Korea is right on the brink of democracy also.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top