Better Watch Out!!!!!!!!!!!

THE WIZZARD

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 28, 2001
3,583
1
0
Pittsburgh, Pa
EVERYONE IS POSTING SEATTLE AND SEATTLE ON THE MONEYLINE ON A LOT OF DIFFERENT SITES.........SF IS ONE OF THE BEST MONDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL TEAMS IN HISTORY.

BETTING PUBLIC WINS ON SUNDAY NIGHT BUT ALWAYS LOSES ON MONDAY NIGHT......SOMETHING TO KEEP IN MIND

I PERSONALLY AM GOIN TO STAY AWAY FROM GAME ;)

GOOD LUCK,
WIZZ.
 

FatBoy

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 3, 1999
418
2
18
67
Pennsylvania, USA
Wizz,

I generally use my office pool as an indicator. What a bunch of total squares. They are 2-1 on SF minus the points. Historically, when it's that lopsided its good for the other side....
 

Pujo21

Registered
Forum Member
May 14, 2002
2,772
2
0
WIZZ...I think you are on to something..

FORRRRRRTTTTTTTTTTYYYYYYYY 999999999errrrrrrssssssss.

Good Luck all
:eek:
 

phoenix566

Cannabis Sativa
Forum Member
Jun 20, 2001
1,571
0
0
inside your head
AFTER A DAY LIKE YESTERDAY

AFTER A DAY LIKE YESTERDAY

no sense giving any of it back!!

sometimes the BEST play is NO play.

better to regret not winning then to have to cough up some hard earned dough to the man.

keep up the excellent capping my friend and fellow pup lover. ;)

(and root SEA home!!)
 

LoneWolf

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2002
84
0
0
Texas
Even though most in here maybe posting Seattle, the actual public consensus is on S.Fran, so if you're thinking along these lines, Sea would be the anti-public play.
 

big joe

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 20, 2001
691
0
16
56
usa
you're right,,public is on SF. BigGuy is SF and that's a good indicator of the public.
So, Wizzard are you still saying to play the anti-public trend?
That would be Seattle.
Good luck
 

big joe

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 20, 2001
691
0
16
56
usa
Wagerline also shows a huge concensus on SF, while a modest concensus on the over.
 

CryBoy

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2000
2,854
30
48
Arlington, TX
Fading the Public

Fading the Public

Is this the new trend in handicapping? Finding the proper "squares" can be confusing. BigGuy has majority on S.F. and MadJackers are mostly on the SeaHags. My office pool has S.F. and yours are on Seattle. :confused:

What ever happened to good old-fashioned team matchups, injuries, weather report, coaching schemes, etc...

I'm going to admit that I am square one, and I am going with the Niners tonight. Based on real research...

Best of luck to which ever opposite side you're on...
 

big joe

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 20, 2001
691
0
16
56
usa
I'm square two and I'm going with the Seahawks. I can't find any real handicapping info to sway me,,so Seattle for a small play to keep me awake 'til the end.
P.S.
Better coach-lean to Holmgren
QB-Garcia by far
Defense-SF
Special teams-Seattle
Backs-tie
Home crowd-Seattle
receivers-SF
DBacks-Seattle
trends-tie
this is getting tiring!
good luck to all
 

LoneWolf

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2002
84
0
0
Texas
It's hard to beat ole Holmgrinch when he's had a week to prepare, add in the fact it's on MNF @ home. I know Dildo is no Favre, but he is a winner. With that said and the contrarian idealogy to boot, Sea looks pretty solid to me, although a modest solid.
 
Last edited:

pt1gard

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 7, 2002
7,377
3
0
seattle
fwiw

fwiw

being in seattle lets set record straight on what holmgrens done thus far

25-28 SU

19-31 ats


sorry am not including this years Gints game cuz cant find exact #s


gl, but dont confuse yourelf that Holgrem is getting it done here so far as HC, not counting tonights game in inference, or indicator how he will do
 

big joe

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 20, 2001
691
0
16
56
usa
congrats Wizzard. Although the warning was confusing, because the public did win last night.
Great game with both teams showing up to play.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top