everyone is aware that bowl ats underdog covers win the game outright an inordinately high percentage of the time,so high many including many here have made lots of dough playing their Bowl dogs ml vs with points.I am playing against the 2005 ml dog winners in the 2006 bowl season,not in all,but in most games from here on out starting with tomarrows game.I feel the linesmaker is likely to make these teams eat some extra points if favored or get less points if dogs the next bowl year as last years bowl game winners particularly dogs,are always popular with players.Playing Okla State -2 vs 'Bama who covered in '05 as a +126 Ml dog.I am also playing against some of these '05 ML dogs that are fav's in'06(BC has covered two years in a row as ML dogs opened -7 vs Navy.They would seem to be candidates to be disappointed by the quality of their competition where as Navy will play to about 10% over whatever their best has been so far this year.)I know if both play to their best BC covers easily,but playing Navy +6 and hoping BC doesn't throw their #1 shot at the Middies.Playing under 38- in Fla St/Ucla,no side.Playing under 47 Mich/Usc with impunity.Back to playing against the '05 ML dog winners...Playing Auburn-1- (an '05 ats loser vs an '05 mldog winner),playing Ark-1-,GaTech+11,Boise St+7,Iowa+9(last years national champs most likely a bet against due to popularity)Florida+7-.Taking all with points to start,will add some ml dog plays later.GL to all handicappers
Last edited:
