We should have kept our attention on getting this chit. He always has something to say that gives the ass holes of the world hope. And there the ones that gives us trouble. Why we changed our direction has never been told in a way that makes any sense. And has cost us more lives then needed.
Bin Still Talking
- Thread starter djv
- Start date
ocelot said:
After we finish up in Iraq in 2012 we'll start focusing more on Bin Laden. Please be patient.
Yeah lets mount a full scale assault on 50-100K square miles of mountainous terrain.
Then we will catch him.
If you have a better idea, lets hear it now or hold your peace.
Enough of your stupidity and mindless criticism.
The troops don't need it.
Thank you.
Then we will catch him.
If you have a better idea, lets hear it now or hold your peace.
Enough of your stupidity and mindless criticism.
The troops don't need it.
Thank you.
I don't know, Freeze, but I wouldn't start the hunt for Bin Laden by mounting a 'full scale attack' on Iraq.
If you think a full scale assault on the mountainous terrain of Afghanistan would be hopeless, what do you consider a little dinky assault?
If you think a full scale assault on the mountainous terrain of Afghanistan would be hopeless, what do you consider a little dinky assault?
Kosar, I would guess that are next best shot at getting him is what we are doing now.
And that is probably a little more reasonable.
I am sure if we knew where he was or knew where his posse was, we woudl mount your little dinky assault.
So keep up the encouragement.
And that is probably a little more reasonable.
I am sure if we knew where he was or knew where his posse was, we woudl mount your little dinky assault.
So keep up the encouragement.
"We should have kept our attention on getting this chit. He always has something to say that gives the ass holes of the world hope."
Hmm Do you think he's stirs them up anymore than NYT/Algezeera media with their prison coverage --ect daily war bashing????
--and does he offer more hope and encouragement to terrorist than media here broadcasting every beheading or bombing and anti war crowd protesting and complaining.
The terrorist couldn't ask for more---free exposure and their own cheerleading squad--
Bin Laden is least of my worries---he apparently learned nothing after trying to influence elections here---and he may shit in his nest here and allienate both the Kurds and Shites.
Wonder how he feels as not long ago was could travel freely in afgan-pakistan-lybia--yemin ect and now can trave no where without looking over his shoulder knowing its a matter of when.
Why when he says nothing for over a year come out several times of late?? My opinion is can't stand to be 2nd or 3rd fiddle--his upper echelon has been decimated--funding froze--and he's confinded to living like roach and others such as Zarcarwi (spl) are stealing his thunder. While I await day he pays as others do he is a toothless tiger to a much greater extent compared to days of old.
Hmm Do you think he's stirs them up anymore than NYT/Algezeera media with their prison coverage --ect daily war bashing????
--and does he offer more hope and encouragement to terrorist than media here broadcasting every beheading or bombing and anti war crowd protesting and complaining.
The terrorist couldn't ask for more---free exposure and their own cheerleading squad--
Bin Laden is least of my worries---he apparently learned nothing after trying to influence elections here---and he may shit in his nest here and allienate both the Kurds and Shites.
Wonder how he feels as not long ago was could travel freely in afgan-pakistan-lybia--yemin ect and now can trave no where without looking over his shoulder knowing its a matter of when.
Why when he says nothing for over a year come out several times of late?? My opinion is can't stand to be 2nd or 3rd fiddle--his upper echelon has been decimated--funding froze--and he's confinded to living like roach and others such as Zarcarwi (spl) are stealing his thunder. While I await day he pays as others do he is a toothless tiger to a much greater extent compared to days of old.
Ray I know you asked Kosar. But if it was not for the OIL. You would be so RIGHT. That's why we need money spent on alternative fuels. I know it gets some attention. But alternative fuel needs to have attention on them as if it's WAR. Tough to do with oil men running the W H. It's just as much Clintons and Bush 1's fault to. We should have been pushing hard as hell in this area ever since war of 91. The hand writing was there to see.
Seems armed forces may be striking back----
Navy SEALs Sue AP Over Alleged Abuse Photos
By Joe Strupp
Published: December 28, 2004 2:25 PM ET
NEW YORK Six Navy SEALs and two of their wives filed a lawsuit against The Associated Press and one of its reporters today for allegedly revealing their identities in photos published in early December, according to a press release from the plaintiffs.
The complaint, filed in California Superior Court, alleges that AP reporter Seth Hettena obtained a photograph in a personal Web site maintained by one of the wives of the Navy SEALs, which contains personal photographs.
None of the plaintiffs are named in the lawsuit, a copy of which was obtained by E&P. They are represented by attorney James W. Huston of San Diego.
Hettena allegedly removed photos from that site and published them on December 4, 2004, in a story stating that the pictures "could be" the earliest evidence of possible prisoner abuse in Iraq, the plaintiffs contend. The SEALs argue that the pictures "actually depict special warfare operators' standard procedures during covert operations. The Iraqis shown being captured in the photographs were leaders of anti-coalition attacks and Saddam loyalists."
AP Director of Corporate Communications Ellen Hale declined to comment immediately to E&P, but said she would look into the matter.
"There was no need for the AP to publish the faces of the SEALs," Huston, the Morrison & Foerster partner who is heading the plaintiffs' legal team, said in a statement. "They added nothing to the value of the story. In fact, the SEALs showed more respect for the insurgents and terrorists that they were apprehending by obscuring their faces than the AP did for the Navy SEALs who were in Iraq risking their lives," he added.
Since the photos were released, they have been published widely in the Arab Press, including on Al Jazeera, the plaintiffs claim.
They are requesting injunctive relief, to preclude republishing the photographs, to preclude the publication of additional unpublished photographs, and to preclude the publication of personal photos by the Navy wife whose site was invaded, such as her wedding photos
Navy SEALs Sue AP Over Alleged Abuse Photos
By Joe Strupp
Published: December 28, 2004 2:25 PM ET
NEW YORK Six Navy SEALs and two of their wives filed a lawsuit against The Associated Press and one of its reporters today for allegedly revealing their identities in photos published in early December, according to a press release from the plaintiffs.
The complaint, filed in California Superior Court, alleges that AP reporter Seth Hettena obtained a photograph in a personal Web site maintained by one of the wives of the Navy SEALs, which contains personal photographs.
None of the plaintiffs are named in the lawsuit, a copy of which was obtained by E&P. They are represented by attorney James W. Huston of San Diego.
Hettena allegedly removed photos from that site and published them on December 4, 2004, in a story stating that the pictures "could be" the earliest evidence of possible prisoner abuse in Iraq, the plaintiffs contend. The SEALs argue that the pictures "actually depict special warfare operators' standard procedures during covert operations. The Iraqis shown being captured in the photographs were leaders of anti-coalition attacks and Saddam loyalists."
AP Director of Corporate Communications Ellen Hale declined to comment immediately to E&P, but said she would look into the matter.
"There was no need for the AP to publish the faces of the SEALs," Huston, the Morrison & Foerster partner who is heading the plaintiffs' legal team, said in a statement. "They added nothing to the value of the story. In fact, the SEALs showed more respect for the insurgents and terrorists that they were apprehending by obscuring their faces than the AP did for the Navy SEALs who were in Iraq risking their lives," he added.
Since the photos were released, they have been published widely in the Arab Press, including on Al Jazeera, the plaintiffs claim.
They are requesting injunctive relief, to preclude republishing the photographs, to preclude the publication of additional unpublished photographs, and to preclude the publication of personal photos by the Navy wife whose site was invaded, such as her wedding photos
