Blacks Saying No To Service

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Blacks are not signing up for service as in past. We better get some of those Mexicans to pickup the slack. The White numbers have been down since 2000. Hey were at war get your asses in the service. You don't want to be called chicken like Cheney, Clinton and Bush.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,514
210
63
Bowling Green Ky
"Blacks are not signing up for service as in past"

Would you expect # to increase during a war??

I think you'd cut out quite a few volunteers from all races that don't have( lets call it) fortitude for it.

I'm just happy and proud there are enough that do have what it takes and draft is not needed.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Yes I agree on that draft part for sure. The draft does not always make the servce a better service.
 

dawgball

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 12, 2000
10,652
39
48
50
If a draft is implemented, I do believe that we would have another Civil War. That would get really ugly.
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
DTB, please explain this to Manson when he gets back. He keeps crowing about the rise in enlistment numbers, for some reason. Maybe he will listen to a co-Patriot.
 

ferdville

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 24, 1999
3,165
5
0
78
So Cal
Chadman - I guess you don't get it this time. The fact that that fewer Blacks are enlisting does not necessarily mean that the overall rate of enlistees is also declining. Kind of a non-sequiter. Another factor may be that the services are basically requiring a high school diploma or something similar of enlistees. Since statistics show that non-whites are less likely to graduate than whites, it might be one cause.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
A well enlistments missed there goals by over 6500 last 4 months. So it's not to bad yet. But not going right direction. However the saving grace is those in are staying a couple of years longer. Hey when they wave 15000/20000 extra bonus under your nose to stay. What to do. So a little money does talk now and then. It's Not always about god and country. When I think what I made and DTB could not have made heck of a lot more. We dam sure were about God and Country. It sure was not for money.
 

danmurphy jr

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 14, 2004
2,966
5
0
Definition of mercenary, Heritage Dictionary:
Motivated solely by a desire for monetary or material gain.
 

IntenseOperator

DeweyOxburger
Forum Member
Sep 16, 2003
17,897
63
0
Chicago
Marine

Thanks for saving this totally pointless thread.

I was really wondering about the numbers for the Irish. DJV can you jump on that one during your retirement when you get a chance. If your lucky, they might be worse and you could start another thread with that "downer". If those numbers don't cut the mustard you could make a run with the Hawaiians or the Greeks. Maybe find something there.

Thanks again.
 

dr. freeze

BIG12 KING
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2001
7,170
8
0
Mansion
marine said:
http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/cda05-08.cfm

Who Bears the Burden? Demographic Characteristics of U.S. Military Recruits Before and After 9/11
by Tim Kane, Ph.D.
Center for Data Analysis Report #05-08

Enjoy, It's actually a very eye opening and interesting read.

nah, CNN implies and reveals that only poor, disenfranchised people die for the rich people in the country

That old fart who runs polls would ask a question like this:

Are you upset that the government is forcing the poor, disenfranchised, miniorites, and needy into the military?

Of course when their ignorant minions vote "yes of course", CNN will tell us how the people are outraged at how this is going on. Then DJV will post about it and Dan Murphy Jr. will throw some words up there that we *may* be able to rearrange and find a thought in.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,514
210
63
Bowling Green Ky
Thanks Marine Was interesting but not surprising--we went through same last time araound--

http://www.vhfcn.org/stat.html

Statistics about the Vietnam War

"No event in American history is more misunderstood than the Vietnam War. It was misreported then, and it is misremembered now. Rarely have so many people been so wrong about so much. Never have the consequences of their misunderstanding been so tragic." [Nixon]

The Vietnam War has been the subject of thousands of newspaper and magazine articles, hundreds of books, and scores of movies and television documentaries. The great majority of these efforts have erroneously portrayed many myths about the Vietnam War as being facts. [Nixon]

Myth: Most American soldiers were addicted to drugs, guilt-ridden about their role in the war, and deliberately used cruel and inhumane tactics.

The facts are:

91% of Vietnam Veterans say they are glad they served [Westmoreland]

74% said they would serve again even knowing the outcome [Westmoreland]

There is no difference in drug usage between Vietnam Veterans and non veterans of the same age group (from a Veterans Administration study) [Westmoreland]

Isolated atrocities committed by American soldiers produced torrents of outrage from antiwar critics and the news media while Communist atrocities were so common that they received hardly any attention at all. The United States sought to minimize and prevent attacks on civilians while North Vietnam made attacks on civilians a centerpiece of its strategy. Americans who deliberately killed civilians received prison sentences while Communists who did so received commendations. From 1957 to 1973, the National Liberation Front assassinated 36,725 South Vietnamese and abducted another 58,499. The death squads focused on leaders at the village level and on anyone who improved the lives of the peasants such as medical personnel, social workers, and schoolteachers. [Nixon] Atrocities - every war has atrocities. War is brutal and not fair. Innocent people get killed.

Vietnam Veterans are less likely to be in prison - only 1/2 of one percent of Vietnam Veterans have been jailed for crimes. [Westmoreland]

97% were discharged under honorable conditions; the same percentage of honorable discharges as ten years prior to Vietnam [Westmoreland]

85% of Vietnam Veterans made a successful transition to civilian life. [McCaffrey]

Vietnam veterans' personal income exceeds that of our non-veteran age group by more than 18 percent. [McCaffrey]

Vietnam veterans have a lower unemployment rate than our non-vet age group. [McCaffrey]

87% of the American people hold Vietnam Vets in high esteem. [McCaffrey]

Myth: Most Vietnam veterans were drafted.

2/3 of the men who served in Vietnam were volunteers. 2/3 of the men who served in World War II were drafted. [Westmoreland] Approximately 70% of those killed were volunteers. [McCaffrey]

Myth: The media have reported that suicides among Vietnam veterans range from 50,000 to 100,000 - 6 to 11 times the non-Vietnam veteran population.

Mortality studies show that 9,000 is a better estimate. "The CDC Vietnam Experience Study Mortality Assessment showed that during the first 5 years after discharge, deaths from suicide were 1.7 times more likely among Vietnam veterans than non-Vietnam veterans. After that initial post-service period, Vietnam veterans were no more likely to die from suicide than non-Vietnam veterans. In fact, after the 5-year post-service period, the rate of suicides is less in the Vietnam veterans' group." [Houk]

Myth: A disproportionate number of blacks were killed in the Vietnam War.

86% of the men who died in Vietnam were Caucasians, 12.5% were black, 1.2% were other races. (CACF and Westmoreland)

Sociologists Charles C. Moskos and John Sibley Butler, in their recently published book "All That We Can Be," said they analyzed the claim that blacks were used like cannon fodder during Vietnam "and can report definitely that this charge is untrue. Black fatalities amounted to 12 percent of all Americans killed in Southeast Asia - a figure proportional to the number of blacks in the U.S. population at the time and slightly lower than the proportion of blacks in the Army at the close of the war." [All That We Can Be]

Myth: The war was fought largely by the poor and uneducated.

Servicemen who went to Vietnam from well-to-do areas had a slightly elevated risk of dying because they were more likely to be pilots or infantry officers.

Vietnam Veterans were the best educated forces our nation had ever sent into combat. 79% had a high school education or better. [McCaffrey]



Here are statistics from the Combat Area Casualty File (CACF) as of November 1993. The CACF is the basis for the Vietnam Veterans Memorial (The Wall):

Average age of 58,148 killed in Vietnam was 23.11 years. (Although 58,169 names are in the Nov. 93 database, only 58,148 have both event date and birth date. Event date is used instead of declared dead date for some of those who were listed as missing in action) [CACF]



Deaths Average Age
Total 58,148 23.11 years
Enlisted 50,274 22.37 years
Officers 6,598 28.43 years
Warrants 1,276 24.73 years
E1 525 20.34 years
11B MOS 18,465 22.55 years
Five men killed in Vietnam were only 16 years old. [CACF]

The oldest man killed was 62 years old. [CACF]

11,465 KIAs were less than 20 years old. [CACF]

Myth: The average age of an infantryman fighting in Vietnam was 19.

Assuming KIAs accurately represented age groups serving in Vietnam, the average age of an infantryman (MOS 11B) serving in Vietnam to be 19 years old is a myth, it is actually 22. None of the enlisted grades have an average age of less than 20. [CACF] The average man who fought in World War II was 26 years of age. [Westmoreland]

and one of my favorites----

Myth: Draft Dodgers Protested Against The War
The fact is they protested because they did not want to be inducted into the military. It is worth noting that when the draft was ended by Congress in 1972, anti-war protests almost ceased entirely. Protests after this period were conducted mostly by the hard-core anti-war movement that had close ties to the North Vietnamese Communist Party. For these people, protesting was a job. They derived their income from donations to the movement so despite the fact that the average American male no longer cared about the war (because he was no longer in danger of having to serve), the anti-war cadre continued to protest.
While protesting against the U.S. involvement in Vietnam made some sense for those who were desperately trying to avoid military service, it is not clear why they displayed Viet Cong flags at their rallies and protest marches. People who today claim they were only expressing their conscience cannot explain why they needed to display the flag of the enemy, and burn the American Flag.

The anti-war movement has been often and erroneously referred to as the "Peace" movement. This is a non-sequitar since despite their rhetoric to the contrary, they never actually called for "peace" per se, only an end to American involvement in the war. They actually did not seem to care very much about the poor Vietnamese peasant that they accused American soldiers of killing. Especially if the North Vietnamese and the VC did the killing. And when Pol Pot went on a killing spree, they uttered not a sound. When the North Vietnamese invaded Cambodia, they said not a word. When the Soviets invaded Afganistan the did not protest. Why? Ask them.

The Vietnam War lasted for over 10 years. During that period 58,202 Americans lost their lives in an attempt to preserve the sovereignty of the Republic of Vietnam. To put this number in perspective, approximately 56,000 Americans are killed every year by drunk drivers. Yet Tom Hayden and Jane Fonda do not lead violent demonstrations outside the Seagrams building.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
The Nam war lasted longer then 10 years. We only called the guys there already in 59 advisers. By time Kennedy was elected we had over 3500 men there. By the time he was shot it was over 17000. And before we got there the French got ran out of Nam. We might have learned from the French on this one. They tried to tell our government Nam was a no win. But Ike had made agreements to help them and Kennedy stood be hind those agreements. The big problem started when Johnson took over and MC Namer convince him to keep sending more troops. If we would have not listen to his lies we may have left in 64.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,514
210
63
Bowling Green Ky
And before we got there the French got ran out of Nam. We might have learned from the French on this one. They tried to tell our government Nam was a no win

Where havent the French been run out of--and appears bout 45% of U.S. has taken their position.

On war we couldn't win?
KIA>kilied in action WIA wounded in action
We reduced casualties from high of
14,594 KIA 87,388 WIA in 1968
to 304 KIA 3,936 in 1972
and just when things were under control who steps up to snatch victory away--
After we left in 73 there were over 2 times more vietnamese and cambodians slaughtered in the next 2 years then in "ten" previous
years combined.---and what do they have to say about it--It was a war "WE" couldn't win--the Essence of Liberal Logic!!!!!!!!!!
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
What would we proved but to keep losing men if we stayed. It started as a civil war and ended worse. What they figure we killed close to 700000 and they just kept coming. What we did wrong last three years was fought to leave. Maybe history is right on that. Maybe not. I guess history is right we could have left in 64. And the ending would have been same as today.
 
Last edited:
Bet on MyBookie
Top