Blowback: Why They Try to Bomb Us

[rusty]

I for one have nothing against Muslims.A lot come to our country make honest livings and truly love the freedom that comes with our country.(go ahead and ridicule that statement still doesn't make you right in your assumption.)


Even the ones that live in there homeland and that come from that region might have different believes and religions but are not extremists and try to live without involvement.(Both sides could be blamed to influence there thinking so don't give me the west force there ideas on them only.It's a two way street.If you don't think so you better check yourself.


My question is this.I'm supposed to be worried about blowback theorists who try to explain why some nut job extremist hates my country?:142smilie Are you ****ing me!

There theory gives me more concrete solid facts on why we must stop them stone cold.There a small percentage of nutjobs who's capabilities since 9/11 have been diminished

Keep up the fight West you cause is not in vain.
It might be more of a guerrilla style type fight but you in my opinion have the upper hand not only here but abroad.God Bless.

 

[Lumi]

Until you can figure out the correct useage of there,their and they're, I don't think you really wil understand the meaning of "Blowback"

 

[rusty]

Until you can figure out the correct useage of there,their and they're, I don't think you really wil understand the meaning of "Blowback"

Well not matter how I spell there you get my point.
Have to admit it's a valid point.What I expressed can't be ignored this isn't Nazi Germany.

 

[Lumi]

Well not matter how I spell there you get my point.
Have to admit it's a valid point.What I expressed can't be ignored this isn't Nazi Germany.

you could have fooled me, I guess you really aren't or haven't been paying attention to the destruction of the Constitution since 9/11 by gee wiz, the Patriot Acts. 1 and 2, Barry extending the Patriot Act, NLE 10.... should I go on, ? Or is the water getting to warm kermit and or you just boiling away in your pot of water?

You can pretend none of these things exist, and based on your avatar, looks like you got your fingers in your ears and you are covering your eyes.

SO my question to you is, HOW DO YOU BREATH LIKE THAT?

 

[rusty]

you could have fooled me, I guess you really aren't or haven't been paying attention to the destruction of the Constitution since 9/11 by gee wiz, the Patriot Acts. 1 and 2, Barry extending the Patriot Act, NLE 10.... should I go on, ? Or is the water getting to warm kermit and or you just boiling away in your pot of water?

You can pretend none of these things exist, and based on your avatar, looks like you got your fingers in your ears and you are covering your eyes.

SO my question to you is, HOW DO YOU BREATH LIKE THAT?

Read what I expressed again geez.....make sense will ya.Earth to illuminati are you there........:topic: :bsflag :liar: :00x21 :00x22 :0032

 

[Lumi]

What am I lying about?

Yes, I am on a different plain than you are.

 

[Trampled Underfoot]

Until you can figure out the correct useage of there,their and they're, I don't think you really wil understand the meaning of "Blowback"

Thank you.

 

[rusty]

Thank you.

It's all our fault.That is such a lie.

 

[rusty]

[Print] 
The predictable and inevitable blowback
By: Mark Tapscott
Editorial Page Editor
May 16, 2010

Conservative journalist and author David Horowitz spoke at the University of California-San Diego last week.

During the Q and A session, student Jumanah Imad Albahri, communications director of UCSD's Muslim Students Association, was incensed by Horowitz's assertion that campus Muslim groups may be connected to terrorist organizations.

Horowitz responded by asking if Albahri would condemn Palestinian terror organization Hamas, "here and now." She refused.

He asked Albahri another direct question. "I am a Jew. The head of [Palestinian terror organization] Hezbollah has said that he hopes that we will gather in Israel so he doesn't have to hunt us down globally. For or Against it?

The young woman wearing a head scarf leaned in said softly, "for it."

The exchange ended up on YouTube. "There is a quiet terror in watching this moment," wrote Benjamin Kerstein atThe New Ledger.

"Perhaps it is the calm politeness, the terrible ordinariness, with which the student expresses her sentiments; as though she were voting 'aye' on a question of raising municipal property taxes or repealing a law requiring dog leashes."

Perhaps what is most terrifying about this exchange is the the context. Our institutions of higher education are undoubtedly fostering such sentiments, as banal as they are evil.

While college students should be encouraged to experiment, perhaps the most necessary lesson for their intellectual health should be that ideas have consequences. But in today's campus environment, political correctness dictates the ideas, regardless of the consequences.

Had a white supremacist student said the same thing about African-Americans, it likely would have led nightly newscasts. Rampant anti-Semitism, on the other hand, has become as prevalent on campuses as keg stands.

Yet the P.C. police aren't about to defend Jews' right to exist. In fact, Horowitz was speaking at the UCSD event opposite anti-Semitic Professor Norman Finkelstein, who refers to Israelis as "Nazis with beards and black hats" and says the holocaust is exaggerated.

Finkelstein was denied tenure at Depaul University for his views, but he doesn't lack for invitations to speak at other colleges as a result.

Of course, it's hard to tell which is worse - this oppressive political correctness, or the moral relativism that enables it. Generations of college kids have been exposed to Michel Foucault, one of the most influential academics of the last century.

Foucault's "concept of 'truth' is relative, that 'madness' is a cultural creation and that 'history' is mere storytelling, are now familiar fare at enlightened dinner parties," notes an article inThe New Statesman.

Accordingly, there's no shortage of academics willing to tell young Muslim students that groups like Hamas and Hizbollah aren't terror networks, but "affinity groups" and "solidarity movements" alleviating Arab suffering at the hands of "imperialism."

So it's not surprising at least one of Albahri's teachers claims she's been victimized. "I'm saddened that this speaker - her elder - manipulated the conversation in this fashion to make her look like someone she isn't, out of an egotistical desire to prove his own point, rather than engaging in a constructive dialogue. A perfect example of why the peace process is limping forward so painfully," wrote Anita Casavantes Bradford, a UCSD grad student who's taught Albahri.

In other words, the people who don't agree with Hitler are the ones holding up the Mideast peace process. Got it. Today's college students are getting the lesson loud and clear - even genocide is a post-modern construct.

Professors will no doubt continue to teach that ideas are relative. But no academic is clever enough to wish away the terrible consequences that will befall us when we're unable to recognize pure evil when we see it.

 

[Trampled Underfoot]

It's all our fault.That is such a lie.

Are you trying to provoke another attack on you? Thats not very godly of you.

 

[rusty]

Are you trying to provoke another attack on you? Thats not very godly of you.

Bring something

 

[Trench]

There a small percentage of nutjobs who's capabilities since 9/11 have been diminished

Congratulations Rusty. In once sentence you've summed up why the "War on Terror" is a complete failure.

Seven years later, we have over 5400 U.S. troops dead, 32000 U.S. troops seriously wounded, we've spent $1 Trillion (the final cost is expected to top $3 Trillion), an estimated 65000 Iraqi police, soldiers and insurgents have been killed, hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilan casualties (estimates range as high as 600,000)...the list goes on and on. All that to "diminish the capabilities of a small number of nutjobs" as you aptly put it.

But hey, I guess it was all worth it Rusty as long as guys like you, Weasel and DTGumby feel safer, because that's what's important.

Trench

 

[Trench]

yeah...real imperialists we are..:0002 ...

Hey Weez, here's a little history lesson for you from one of my favorite authors, Howard Zinn.
I doubt you've read any of his writings though, because it would require you to think outside that
tiny little neoconservative lockbox you call a brain.

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Arn3lF5XSUg&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Arn3lF5XSUg&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

 

[Trampled Underfoot]

Bring something

Excuse me?

 

[rusty]

Excuse me?

Something intelligent ,you know if your gonna respond to my post at least bring something informative and educational.

 

[Lumi]

I have something for you Rusty

their   /?ɛər; unstressed ?ər/ Show Spelled[thair; unstressed ther] Show IPA
?pronoun
1.a form of the possessive case of they used as an attributive adjective, before a noun: their home; their rights as citizens; their departure for Rome.
2.(used after an indefinite singular antecedent in place of the definite masculine form his or the definite feminine form her): Someone left their book on the table. Did everyone bring their lunch?


there   /?ɛər; unstressed ?ər/ Show Spelled[thair; unstressed ther] Show IPA
?adverb
1.in or at that place (opposed to here): She is there now.
2.at that point in an action, speech, etc.: He stopped there for applause.
3.in that matter, particular, or respect: His anger was justified there.
4.into or to that place; thither: We went there last year.
5.(used by way of calling attention to something or someone): There they go.
6.in or at that place where you are: Well, hi there.

they're   /?ɛər; unstressed ?ər/ Show Spelled[thair; unstressed ther] Show IPA
contraction of they are.


I hope this doesn't confuse you more?

Do you still want to rip my head off?

I have the miles to fly you into Palm Springs, make sure you bring an attitude and hatred towards different lifestyles. They will love you, you might not make it out of the terminal. :box2: :box2:

 

[rusty]

I have something for you Rusty

their   /?ɛər; unstressed ?ər/ Show Spelled[thair; unstressed ther] Show IPA
?pronoun
1.a form of the possessive case of they used as an attributive adjective, before a noun: their home; their rights as citizens; their departure for Rome.
2.(used after an indefinite singular antecedent in place of the definite masculine form his or the definite feminine form her): Someone left their book on the table. Did everyone bring their lunch?


there   /?ɛər; unstressed ?ər/ Show Spelled[thair; unstressed ther] Show IPA
?adverb
1.in or at that place (opposed to here): She is there now.
2.at that point in an action, speech, etc.: He stopped there for applause.
3.in that matter, particular, or respect: His anger was justified there.
4.into or to that place; thither: We went there last year.
5.(used by way of calling attention to something or someone): There they go.
6.in or at that place where you are: Well, hi there.

they're   /?ɛər; unstressed ?ər/ Show Spelled[thair; unstressed ther] Show IPA
contraction of they are.


I hope this doesn't confuse you more?

Do you still want to rip my head off?

I have the miles to fly you into Palm Springs, make sure you bring an attitude and hatred towards different lifestyles. They will love you, you might not make it out of the terminal. :box2: :box2:

:0008

 

[rusty]

Congratulations Rusty. In once sentence you've summed up why the "War on Terror" is a complete failure.

Seven years later, we have over 5400 U.S. troops dead, 32000 U.S. troops seriously wounded, we've spent $1 Trillion (the final cost is expected to top $3 Trillion), an estimated 65000 Iraqi police, soldiers and insurgents have been killed, hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilan casualties (estimates range as high as 600,000)...the list goes on and on. All that to "diminish the capabilities of a small number of nutjobs" as you aptly put it.

But hey, I guess it was all worth it Rusty as long as guys like you, Weasel and DTGumby feel safer, because that's what's important.

Trench

And we haven't had one successful attack since 9/11.Works for me.Sorry for the losses along the way,I appreciate there sacrifices to keep me and you and the rest of us safe.

 

[Lumi]

So Rusty,

You are willing to sacrifice your freedoms for security ? Because in the post above, that's what you are saying, correct?

 

[rusty]

So Rusty,

You are willing to sacrifice your freedoms for security ? Because in the post above, that's what you are saying, correct?

Why would you twist something like that.Think about what you just posted.It makes NO SENSE at all.The two go hand in hand.

With a post like that you lose all credibility.