In a rush to get early one in.
App St -2- Respect WKU, but just think App is better
App St >67 Shootout
GLA
App St -2- Respect WKU, but just think App is better
App St >67 Shootout
GLA
Bowls
- Thread starter theshiek
- Start date
Too many favs
Fresno -11- If Fresno comes to play, this one is easy
BYU -7 Same as above
Liberty -10 Star QB needs to show off today
Marshall +4 UL big game was conf championship w/ their lame duck coach. THey won, he's gone. UL has superior talent, but don't
think they'll be sharp tonight.
GLA
Fresno -11- If Fresno comes to play, this one is easy
BYU -7 Same as above
Liberty -10 Star QB needs to show off today
Marshall +4 UL big game was conf championship w/ their lame duck coach. THey won, he's gone. UL has superior talent, but don't
think they'll be sharp tonight.
GLA
Yeah, thinking about >35- for 2h, but these types of games typically slow down. Maybe not here, though. Not sure either D can adjust much.
I agree they usually slow down. The tackling on both sides is awful. I am gonna play that the shootout continues...half of game bet...just played it...up to 37:scared
W.Ky...311 yards passing 1H.:0002
Last edited:
2-4 so far
SDSt <49 UTSA w/o stud RB. Teams typically like to open it up in bowl games, but think both teams stay close to the vest here with
each looking for school record W,
GLA
SDSt <49 UTSA w/o stud RB. Teams typically like to open it up in bowl games, but think both teams stay close to the vest here with
each looking for school record W,
GLA
Think maybe some confusion here Kid? I think FourCorners was talking about his own play, a 2H play.
Of course I was referring to my call. You got that one crossed up Kid. I keep it positive:0074. Life too short. Shiek does solid work here.
Last edited:
2-5
Mizzo +7 RB Badie sitting out will hurt some, but no QB Bazelak may be addition by subtraction. If this were P or Army + I'd be all
over Army. Can't trust the Knights laying this many pts. Army has a nice win over Liberty, but it was helped by Lib going
for it on 4th and long 3x, plus a fake punt on their first 4 drives. All in Lib territory.
Mizzo >53- Mizzo D has been bad vs the run. Army D is no stonewall, either. Even with back-up QB Mizzo gets 20+. Thinking 31-28.
GLA
Mizzo +7 RB Badie sitting out will hurt some, but no QB Bazelak may be addition by subtraction. If this were P or Army + I'd be all
over Army. Can't trust the Knights laying this many pts. Army has a nice win over Liberty, but it was helped by Lib going
for it on 4th and long 3x, plus a fake punt on their first 4 drives. All in Lib territory.
Mizzo >53- Mizzo D has been bad vs the run. Army D is no stonewall, either. Even with back-up QB Mizzo gets 20+. Thinking 31-28.
GLA
3-6
Mizzo settling for 3 fg's vs Army not good. That crushed the over.
UNT +1 Can't see Mia(O) reversing the poor MAC showing so far this bowl season. UNT nothing special, but it's practically a home
game as well.
UNT >56- UNT played better D down the stretch, but the competition was nothing great. Shootout
UCF +7 Several Gator starters out for various reasons. Big game for UCF, not much so for UF.
GLA
Mizzo settling for 3 fg's vs Army not good. That crushed the over.
UNT +1 Can't see Mia(O) reversing the poor MAC showing so far this bowl season. UNT nothing special, but it's practically a home
game as well.
UNT >56- UNT played better D down the stretch, but the competition was nothing great. Shootout
UCF +7 Several Gator starters out for various reasons. Big game for UCF, not much so for UF.
GLA
4-8
L'ville P Going w/ team playing better strength competition. Don't think L'ville will be dazed by AF run game
MSU -10- Hearing about MSU virus issues, but rolling w/ Leach to run it up if he has any chance to
WVU +5 Think this one has old school slugfest written all over it. Will take the nice pts.
GLA
L'ville P Going w/ team playing better strength competition. Don't think L'ville will be dazed by AF run game
MSU -10- Hearing about MSU virus issues, but rolling w/ Leach to run it up if he has any chance to
WVU +5 Think this one has old school slugfest written all over it. Will take the nice pts.
GLA
4-11 Ugh!
OU>63 Missed the 60-61 range. A lot of quality D players out on both sides. Probably a 17-14 game.
GLA
OU>63 Missed the 60-61 range. A lot of quality D players out on both sides. Probably a 17-14 game.
GLA
5-11
Finally hit one
SC +12- Not sure UNC wants to be here. May be to many outs for SC, but like their scrappy play.
Tenn >65- Purdue still has enough talent w/o Bell to this close for awhile.
Pitt >55- neither D all that good
GLA
Finally hit one
SC +12- Not sure UNC wants to be here. May be to many outs for SC, but like their scrappy play.
Tenn >65- Purdue still has enough talent w/o Bell to this close for awhile.
Pitt >55- neither D all that good
GLA
6-12
Needed a Pitt FG to maybe get the back door over, and the sweep. Oh well, can't complain with a 2-1 day after my start to the bowl season.
Rutgers +18 Knights have been blown out several times, and WF can score. However, I'm basing this solely on level of
competition. B10 far superior to ACC top to bottom. If this were a reg season game I don't think it'd be 18.
Granted Rutgers on short notice, but they may work to their favor by helping them focus.
Rutgers >63 Been riding WF overs most of the yr, why stop now. WF can score, but they also allow pts by the truckload. RU O
not great, but neither is WF D.
CMU +7 Coogs top rusher and OT sitting out. Playing CMU a let down for Wazzu, but CMU has to pumped to get the bigger
stage.
Cincy +14- Cincy went at it LY w/ Geo in a close one. See the same here. They may not win, but I think it could be a
classic.
Mich +7- Looking for a low scoring, tight affair. Not impressed w/ Bulldog O. Their TE's are awesome, but QB play has been
average at best.
GLA and Happy New Year!
Needed a Pitt FG to maybe get the back door over, and the sweep. Oh well, can't complain with a 2-1 day after my start to the bowl season.
Rutgers +18 Knights have been blown out several times, and WF can score. However, I'm basing this solely on level of
competition. B10 far superior to ACC top to bottom. If this were a reg season game I don't think it'd be 18.
Granted Rutgers on short notice, but they may work to their favor by helping them focus.
Rutgers >63 Been riding WF overs most of the yr, why stop now. WF can score, but they also allow pts by the truckload. RU O
not great, but neither is WF D.
CMU +7 Coogs top rusher and OT sitting out. Playing CMU a let down for Wazzu, but CMU has to pumped to get the bigger
stage.
Cincy +14- Cincy went at it LY w/ Geo in a close one. See the same here. They may not win, but I think it could be a
classic.
Mich +7- Looking for a low scoring, tight affair. Not impressed w/ Bulldog O. Their TE's are awesome, but QB play has been
average at best.
GLA and Happy New Year!
Agree w Mich total...see smash mouth as D is both teams' strength...Not impressed w Bennet III.
6-15 Back to normal
Ark -3- Think Ark really wants to be here. First bowl since '14 w/ LY's cancelled.
KU -3 Respect Iowa D, but KU flt out better
ND -2 Think OkieSt still licking wounds from title game loss to Baylor. ND interim is next yrs HC, which is motivating for the
players.
Ut <64 Think OSU D shows up for this one after hearing bout soft they are.
GLA
Ark -3- Think Ark really wants to be here. First bowl since '14 w/ LY's cancelled.
KU -3 Respect Iowa D, but KU flt out better
ND -2 Think OkieSt still licking wounds from title game loss to Baylor. ND interim is next yrs HC, which is motivating for the
players.
Ut <64 Think OSU D shows up for this one after hearing bout soft they are.
GLA
