Break Up the Big Oil Cartel

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Republican Rhetoric; Democratic Cluelessness

Break Up the Big Oil Cartel
By RALPH NADER

What a week it has been for the giant oil companies! Billions in record quarterly profits rushing into their coffers. An even bigger round of quarterly profits coming up. Gargantuan executive pay bonanzas. And a pile of "forces beyond our control" excuses to publicize in response to the empty outrage of Washington politicians and the real squeeze on consumers and small businesses.

Oil man Bush, atop his administration marinated with ex-oil executives in high positions, keeps saying there is little he can do. It is the market of supply and demand. Only fuel cells and hydrogen sometime down the 21st-century road can save the country from dependency on foreign oil, he says repeatedly. Plus more drilling in the Arctic Wildlife Refuge.

The public heat about energy prices prodded Mr. Bush this week, however, to at least make a little change in rhetoric. He repeated his warning that his government will not tolerate any gouging. Yet the supine reporters did not ask him whether he has ever caught a gouger. But he did mumble something about higher fuel economy standards so that your car guzzles a little less gasoline. He said he will be meeting with the domestic auto company executives in the White House in mid-May. He praised ethanol again. He visited a gas station in Mississippi to feel the pain of the motorists.

Will Hollywood ever leave Washington, DC?

On Capitol Hill--aka wurthering heights--the Republicans are starting to talk tough, mumbling about larger taxes on oil industry profits--an idea Bush said he would veto last year. The Democrats cannot even agree on an excess profits tax, preferring the greasy band-aid of lifting the 18.4 cent gasoline tax for sixty days. This new detour is pathetic since it takes the heat off the industry's skyrocketing gasoline price which are well into the $3 to $4/gallon range in many places.

A few, very few members of Congress, like Senator Byron Dorgan (D--North Dakota) know what has to be done to this industry and its long-time grip over the federal government. First, the gouging profits must be recaptured and returned now to the consumer. The government must also invest in advanced public transit systems.

Big oil has been on a marriage binge and the mergers, including the wedding of Exxon (number one) and Mobil (number two), have tightened further the corporate cartel of oil as it feeds off the government producers' cartel of oil abroad. Antitrust break up action is necessary.

The claim by the oil barons that they're just responding to the marketplace of supply and demand is laughable. Why are they making double and triple profits? Why are their top executives tripling their own pay? Hard-pressed sellers of oil would not have such a luxurious profit and pay spiral. Hard-pressed sellers of oil would not have paid $144,000 every day to Exxon CEO, Lee Raymond since 1993 and then send him off with a $398 million retirement deal.

A competitive domestic oil industry would not be so able to close down scores of refineries and then turn "refinery shortages" into higher gas prices at the pump. Nor would competitive companies get away with a return on capital of 46 percent for upstream drilling and production operations, plus a 32 percent for refining and marketing. Washington Post business reporter, Steven Pearlstein, call these returns "hedge fund returns." Except with hedge funds there is a risk of losing from time to time. Not so with the corporate government of Big Oil.

A President, preoccupied with his criminal, fabricated war in Iraq, would not leave Americans defenseless as oil prices eat into their family budgets. A standup President would order an all-fronts investigation of the oil industry's pricing practices from the oil well to the gasoline station.

There would be full use of subpoenas and public testimony from the oil bosses under oath by his regulatory agencies. He would organize with his Republican majority in Congress a repeal of past and recent unconscionable tax breaks and stop giving away your oil on federal property in the Gulf of Mexico to the oil companies without any royalties. He would press for an excess-profits tax and legislation raising by statute the fuel efficiency performance for new motor vehicles, including SUVs, Minivans and light trucks.

A standup President would raise margin requirements to tone down the speculation in oil futures that are swelling the New York Mercantile Exchange and contributing to higher gasoline and heating oil prices. He would support tariffs on imported refinery products to push the companies to expand and build new cleaner refineries in the U.S. Where? In some of the exact locations where the oil industry shut down these refineries over the past thirty years to contract overall output and move operations to cheap labor locations abroad.

A standup President would give an address to the nation that mobilizes small and larger businesses which use oil to join with consumers in a common cause against the looming inflationary jolts that will raise prices for many regular products and lead to higher interest rates by the Federal Reserve.

Bush can never proactively do this for the American people who already by more than a 2 to 1 margin believe he cares more about the interests of Big Business than the interests of regular people.

But, mobilized small business can get him to relent and let some of these changes happen.

The small business revolt can start with several hundred economically squeezed truckers bringing their 18 wheelers to Washington in a protest that encircles in a wide arc the Congress and the White House and the federal buildings in between. Now that would be more than a message. It would be an irresistible visual image for the television cameras day after day.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Go get-em Ralph. But would it all work? At least he has some new ideas. Like the trucks around the Capitol. At least they all could blow there horn at same time.
 

dr. freeze

BIG12 KING
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2001
7,170
8
0
Mansion
great idea...certainly getting the government involved is the answer

then we will be paying 5$ at the pump
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
We certainly got the oil executives involved IN government developing the current energy policy, and you see where that got us, Freeze. No help for the consumer, and big help for the oil executives. Pretty soon, we'll be paying $5 at the pump anyway, if the current combo remains in control. Guess it makes more sense to just trust the oil execs to do what's best for the general public, right?
 

dr. freeze

BIG12 KING
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2001
7,170
8
0
Mansion
Chadman said:
We certainly got the oil executives involved IN government developing the current energy policy, and you see where that got us, Freeze. No help for the consumer, and big help for the oil executives. Pretty soon, we'll be paying $5 at the pump anyway, if the current combo remains in control. Guess it makes more sense to just trust the oil execs to do what's best for the general public, right?

Who do you think makes more on a gallon of gas?

a. The oil company
b. The government

Now, who does more work in bringing you that same gallon of gas?

a. The oil company
b. The government
c. The government never works productively and efficiently
d. A and C are true



If you answered 1. a and 2. d you might not be a blind communist
 

Marco

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 29, 2003
793
0
0
Always a warm feeling to know a few greedy pr1cks at the top are receiving a virtually unspendable sum.....it'd be a little justice if Exxon was union and the workers decided to go on strike for higher pay....

So, with all this "supply and demand" excuse bull$hit the oil companies are using.....how does this differ from the times along the southeast coast when price gouging went into effect when people were buying up plywood to cover their windows from incoming hurricanes?

If I remember right the govt said they'd crack down on future price gouging in that industry....guess they won't in the oil industry figuring how deep in bed politicians are with big oil....that's why I doubt you'll ever see any alternative energy sources prop up anytime soon....
 

TonyTT

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2002
353
1
0
71
Ohio
Marco said:
Always a warm feeling to know a few greedy pr1cks at the top are receiving a virtually unspendable sum.....it'd be a little justice if Exxon was union and the workers decided to go on strike for higher pay....

Can't speak for Exxon workers but I can tell you that VALERO (the nations largest refiner) does have many union refineries. Top union pay for the one here in Ohio is $30/hr working 12 hr shifts, with time and 1/2 for working days off and double time and 1/2 on holidays, of course with a 24 hr operation they work all holidays. They get matched up to 9% of their pay by the company in their 401k plan and also have a retirement plan. They can call off sick 3 times a year and take 3 days off each time without a doctors excuse with full pay. The most senior ones get 6 weeks of vacation with pay or cash in lieu of, and have an 80/20 medical plan. With the obscene oil profits in recent years they've gotten nice bonus checks each year. They've definately got their cut of the action and won't be going on strike anytime soon.
I would imagine the Exxon workers package is fairly close.
TT
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
dr. freeze said:
Who do you think makes more on a gallon of gas?

a. The oil company
b. The government

Now, who does more work in bringing you that same gallon of gas?

a. The oil company
b. The government
c. The government never works productively and efficiently
d. A and C are true

If you answered 1. a and 2. d you might not be a blind communist

What does that have to do with my comment?

I'm not necesarily saying that the government should get involved without some kind of good reason or a plan, I'm merely commenting on how the oil companies have prospered specifically due to the current administration and their role in gaining tax incentives and tax breaks. Specifically, Dick Cheney, and the oil and energy execs combining, and a Republican congress and senate majority escorting it through to fruition.

Leaving these people alone to their own devices has evidently helped them, and hurts us in the pocketbook every time we fill up. If that's ok with you, that's fine. It's not with me.
 

dr. freeze

BIG12 KING
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2001
7,170
8
0
Mansion
Chadman said:
Leaving these people alone to their own devices has evidently helped them, and hurts us in the pocketbook every time we fill up. If that's ok with you, that's fine. It's not with me.

Back in the stone age, man invented currency for value based on supply on demand.

You leftists want us to go back to pre-stone age days while you devalue that same currency as you think you are entitled to everything.

If it is such a great deal they have going, why are you not on fast track to get into midmanagement in the oil industry since they are in such need of entry level execs right now?

Instead, you bitch about it. Waah Waah Waah. Help me government. Help me!!!!!

Good grief, get on the right side of the economic spectrum where the productivity lies. I just never have figured out why oh why you leftists demean the people who have brought you the greatest standard of living in the history of the world. Time and again. If these execs didn't turn their companies around, then they wouldn't have gotten paid so much.

Screw them for going after the American Dream and helping millions of us in the process.

Envy at its greatest.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
So this is Cheneys secret energy plan at work. Oil, Oil, Oil. Not what really needs to be done for our security long term. Something other then oil.
 

Marco

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 29, 2003
793
0
0
"Screw them for going after the American Dream..."

dr. freeze......I doubt there is going to be much sympathy from anyone in the forum, or outside of forum either, for guys like Lee Raymond who retire and take a virtually unspendable sum along with them.....how many people are going to be anywhere near that kind of money without being at the top and deciding what level of greed prevails as to what they feel is adequate compensation.....

Who the fvck else is going to retire from Exxon with hundreds of millions of dollars?

And yes, shame on us for not aspiring towards "the fast track to get into midmanagement in the oil industy" and feeling the need for greed and sucking up the pie and leaving the crumbs for whoever is left.

I will agree with the thought that owners are entitled to a profit, but I think most people would agree that this is simply unchecked greed and those millions could have been better spread out to the whole company than give it all to one overpaid c0cksucker.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top