Why didn't they go for 2 to cut it to 11 points down?
MadJack Administrator Staff member Forum Admin Super Moderators Channel Owner Jul 13, 1999 106,019 2,295 113 70 home Jan 10, 2021 #41 Why didn't they go for 2 to cut it to 11 points down?
B BigFatLooza Registered User Forum Member Nov 1, 2006 1,242 44 48 Jan 10, 2021 #42 Yikes, Browns starting to look like the Browns again.
gardenweasel el guapo Forum Member Jan 10, 2002 40,607 255 83 "the bunker" Jan 10, 2021 #43 MadJack said: Why didn't they go for 2 to cut it to 11 points down? Click to expand... i wouldn`t have gone forthe first "2"(too early)....and would have gone for the 2nd...... makes no sense ...
MadJack said: Why didn't they go for 2 to cut it to 11 points down? Click to expand... i wouldn`t have gone forthe first "2"(too early)....and would have gone for the 2nd...... makes no sense ...
MadJack Administrator Staff member Forum Admin Super Moderators Channel Owner Jul 13, 1999 106,019 2,295 113 70 home Jan 10, 2021 #44 gardenweasel said: i wouldn`t have gone forthe first "2"(too early)....and would have gone for the 2nd...... makes no sense ... Click to expand... Exactly. WTF are they thinking? I have no clue why they did the first one. Give me one reason? Had they gone for 1 and 1 they would be within 11.
gardenweasel said: i wouldn`t have gone forthe first "2"(too early)....and would have gone for the 2nd...... makes no sense ... Click to expand... Exactly. WTF are they thinking? I have no clue why they did the first one. Give me one reason? Had they gone for 1 and 1 they would be within 11.
yyz Under .500 Forum MemberTop Poster Of Month Mar 16, 2000 44,523 2,624 113 On the course! Jan 10, 2021 #45 I guess Cleveland feels they can just go three and out the rest of the game? Good luck.
MadJack Administrator Staff member Forum Admin Super Moderators Channel Owner Jul 13, 1999 106,019 2,295 113 70 home Jan 10, 2021 #46 Same situation but this time they go for 2. :SIB