How do you know of the quality?
Man, this sucks.
Just go by the numbers. If hundreds or thousands of people are passing it around, then it is obviously okay. Or are you talking about cam versions? IMO those all suck.
the kat, Jack mentioned, is decent--when working. VG for magnet torrents.
isohunt.com decent
btscene and bitsnoop not so hot but I've used 'em
torlock, torrentscan and bitmonster all let you check (with annoying difficulties) multiple sites (one at a freakin' time) for whatevas
also try filetram or filestube, for some good options, depending on quest
demonoid.me (used to be .com) has probably the best selection and the best comments, but very limited for non-members
I know a host of others but depends what you're looking for. I used to use btjunkie for 1st search for a lot of stuff as it had no annoying pop-ups, and the comments seemed quite accurate.
If you're CSIS then fuck off.
I have clearance.
Extraordinary perdition.
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/TCAwS152af0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
A magnet torrent is, best as I can describe, a torrent that somehow locks on better to av. seeders.
Allegedly downloading from peers directly, or so they say.
wtf the difference is remains beyond my grasp.
technicality-wise.
no seeders is no seeders and, from my experience, reggae torrents are just as good.
kickasstorrents sometimes has their reggae torrents screwed while their magnets work.
whatever than pertains to.
I want it I want it I want it.
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/bl9bvuAV-Ao" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.
