Pro,
You miss the point. The $29 million figure is pure conjecture concocted by people who earn their living promoting immigration restriction. Don't you think there's just a chance they might use estimates that are greatly biased in favor of their argument? Of course. That is why I rightly accuse this of being propaganda. Show me an impartially researched study from an unbiased organization and I guarantee you that the numbers from CIS will be shown to be immensely bloated.
The main point, as it has always been, is that in the long run, there is absolutely no sensible large scale fiscal argument that can be made against open immigration. That is just a fact. Whatever short term cost we have will be dwarfed many times over by future financial gains from a more open immigration policy. Again, that is an indisputable fact.
My point remains. PRO190 is posting conservative propaganda and passing it off as fact. The study is flawed and not accepted by ANYONE except those whose ideology it supports.
yyz, you, like PRO190, are out of your league.