bush vs. kerry at a glance

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
How Republican, Democrat stand on key issues

MSNBC staff and news service reports
Updated: 4:34 p.m. ET March 04, 2004

Here's a quick look at where Sen. John Kerry and President Bush stand on the central issues expected to dominate the 2004 race for the White House.


ECONOMY

Bush: The president has repeatedly called on Congress to make his tax cuts permanent, saying failure to do so would amount to a tax hike and threaten prospects for a robust economic recovery capable of generating new jobs. Congressional analysts say that making the tax cuts permanent would cost about $1.3 trillion over the next 10 years.

Kerry: Kerry has called for repeal of the Bush tax cuts for Americans earning more than $200,000 a year, in order to pay for broad health care reform. However, he would retain the tax cuts for the middle class. He says he can halve the record half-trillion dollar budget by the end of one four-year term, even while spending $72 billion a year to extend health care to 27 million of the 40-plus million uninsured. His campaign has provided no details.

ENERGY and ENVIRONMENT

Bush: Bush, who pulled the United States out of the Kyoto protocol on greenhouse gas emissions, believes the threat of global warming should be addressed through new economic growth and efficiency. He also favors oil exploration in Alaska?s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and backs legislation that would seek to reduce air pollution and acid rain by offering major polluters access to market-based incentives to reduce harmful emissions.

Kerry: Kerry favors U.S. participation in an international climate change program to curb global warming and would cut mercury emissions by American utilities and plants. To encourage more renewable energy sources, Kerry wants to create a renewable energy trust fund to reduce oil consumption by 2 million barrels per day, which is roughly the amount imported from the Middle East. Kerry also backed Senate legislation to impose stricter mileage standards on gas-guzzling sport utility vehicles and automobiles.

FOREIGN POLICY

Bush: After straining relations with major European allies and the United Nations over war in Iraq, Bush has shifted his foreign policy focus to the spread of democracy by pushing a Greater Middle East Initiative that would aim to resolve the region?s political, economic and social problems through democratic reform. The president, criticized for the failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, is also pursuing a policy that seeks to unravel the black market in nuclear components and block programs in North Korea and Iran, countries he has labeled an ?axis of evil? along with prewar Iraq.

Kerry: While insisting he would never cede U.S. security to any other nation and would use force when required, Kerry envisions ?a new era of alliances? to replace what he sees as the White House?s go-it-alone approach to foreign policy. He has pledged to restore diplomacy as a tool of U.S. foreign policy, treat the United Nations as a ?full partner? and pursue collective security arrangements. His inner circle of foreign policy advisers features prominent Democratic veterans, including some figures from the Clinton days.

POST-WAR IRAQ

Bush: After seeing his plan to bring democracy to Iraq through regional caucuses scuttled by a leading Shi?ite cleric, Bush has succeeded in brokering an interim constitution for the oil-rich Arab nation and pledged to work with Iraqi leaders and the United Nations to prepare for full Iraqi sovereignty by June 30. The administration expects U.S. troops to remain in Iraq indefinitely as a security measure against insurgents and sectarian violence.

Kerry: He voted in 2002 in favor of the war against Iraq, but has since attacked the administration for misrepresenting the military threat posed by Baghdad and for mismanaging the post-war occupation. He later voted against the appropriation of $87 billion for the U.S.-led effort, a move that has led some critics, including some in his own party, to accuse him of hypocrisy.

TRADE

Bush: Bush, an avowed free trader, has embarked on a series of trade agreements with countries in Asia, Latin America and Africa. But his administration has also faced charges of protectionism over steel tariffs that the World Trade Organization ruled illegal, and its reluctance to trim import barriers that protect U.S. sugar, dairy and beef industries.

Kerry: Kerry has promised a 120-day review of all existing U.S. trade agreements upon taking office, and favors using the World Trade Organization to challenge China?s currency practices. He also has pressed for stronger labor and environmental language than Bush has required in growing collection of bilateral free trade agreements with countries around the world.

ISRAEL and the PALESTINIANS

Bush: Bush, a staunch defender of Israel, backs the stalled ?road map? to Middle East peace that calls for creation of a Palestinian state alongside Israel by next year. The White House has also expressed concern about Israel?s construction of a security barrier through Palestinian territory, ostracized Palestinian President Yasser Arafat and cautiously embraced Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon?s proposal to dismantle Jewish settlements in Gaza.

Kerry: Kerry says he would breath new life into the moribund Middle East peace process and name a special presidential envoy to the Muslim world, who would seek to encourage moderate elements.
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,476
151
63
Bowling Green Ky
I would like to know how both sides plan to carry out these objectives.
To say you want to do something is irrelevant without a feasible plan to do so.

Promises from either side about anticipated balanced budget is laughable unless they can accurately project future economy and future catastrophic events.
 

SixFive

bonswa
Forum Member
Mar 12, 2001
18,737
242
63
54
BG, KY, USA
Kerry's ideas below are preposterous. Renewable energy trust fund to reduce oil consumption (joke) and harsher restrictions on SUVS (joke). PS No such thing as global warming. Love Bush's idea of exploring the arctic. It can be done without harming the wildlife, and I'm one of the first ones that wants to keep the wildlife around.

Gun control isn't mentioned here, and that is a real sore spot with me against Kerry.


''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
ENERGY and ENVIRONMENT

Bush: Bush, who pulled the United States out of the Kyoto protocol on greenhouse gas emissions, believes the threat of global warming should be addressed through new economic growth and efficiency. He also favors oil exploration in Alaska?s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and backs legislation that would seek to reduce air pollution and acid rain by offering major polluters access to market-based incentives to reduce harmful emissions.

Kerry: Kerry favors U.S. participation in an international climate change program to curb global warming and would cut mercury emissions by American utilities and plants. To encourage more renewable energy sources, Kerry wants to create a renewable energy trust fund to reduce oil consumption by 2 million barrels per day, which is roughly the amount imported from the Middle East. Kerry also backed Senate legislation to impose stricter mileage standards on gas-guzzling sport utility vehicles and automobiles.
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
There is no reason we cant have a new energy policie other then just keep Drilling. Thats the old policie for last 30 years. It dont work. For one there is no reason our monsters trucks and suv.s we drive cant do better on mileage. They said 30 years ago we cant get the mileage out of our autos that is asked for. They did after being told to do so. It can be done. We have so much coal. They no there are ways to burn it cleaner. But they dont push it. Why it's so expensive were told. Sounds like someone lobbing again. You know, NO never did nothing. WE all should help conserve. But will we? It's about more then have the other guy do it. I dont have to. They have tried for years to have more folks ride a bus or car pool. Folks act like they were asked to walk.
As for that neat list of items above. Sorry been here to long to buy into most of that crap. They all say, but never say how. Just BS.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top