C Wallace of FOX Keeps Job??
- Thread starter djv
- Start date
I'm a dem... and live in the south...
but hell... I only watch fox because the women are smoking =]
Martha MacCullum. Scrumptious!
DJV Exactly when will you watch Fox instead of getting your erroneous BS from liberal blogs.
Here is some more BS propaganda quotes from your liberal blogs-on video in question--
"FOX & FRIENDS VS. FOX ANCHOR CHRIS WALLACE(ANCHOR WALKS OFF) "
here is video --WHERE does he walk off????
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mcyvj8YV_1M&feature=related
I liked the video and conversation and doubt you'd find another news network--where you get fair and balanced discussion--
--and you'd think you would all get tired of being exposed on weekly basis--
Liar, Liar
The left-wing blog Think Progress has had to eat its words after claiming presidential candidate John McCain plagiarized.
An entry posted Thursday ? under the heading "Corrupt Establishments" ? claims that McCain lifted parts of a speech given by retired Navy Rear Admiral Timothy Ziemer. During a Wednesday speech to the Los Angeles World Affairs Council McCain said, "When nations seek to resolve their differences by force of arms, a million tragedies ensue."
The site compared that to Ziemer's words, "War is awful and when nations seek to resolve their differences by fighting, a million tragedies ensue.?
The site listed three other instances where McCain copied parts of Ziemer's 1996 speech. The problem is McCain has been using these lines since 1995. The site has since posted an apology saying, "It appears Ziemer's speech may have been plagiarized from McCain... the senator used these lines before Ziemer... we regret the error."
Last edited:
Well I was watching that day. Had just flipped back because Robin went to commercial on head line news. And if they cut it out they did but that one young guy left. And even joked about it next day. After about 2 hours of bashing Obama I gave Wallce some high marks. I had switched back and fourth severl times that morning and could not believe the way they were going. Sad part is they were tying to sound like experts. Chit you and I can do better. By the way you could see the next day the un-edited version of this on other networks.
Video I pulled was from liberal blog--don't care which one anyone watches --he wasn't present at interview--so impossible to walk off
---and have seen zilch on any mention of remotest thought of fox firing him--the others in morning show will be gone long before him.
--a person could spend 24/7 just exposing bogus liberal reporting.
---and have seen zilch on any mention of remotest thought of fox firing him--the others in morning show will be gone long before him.
--a person could spend 24/7 just exposing bogus liberal reporting.
DJV Exactly when will you watch Fox instead of getting your erroneous BS from liberal blogs.
kinda like the debt increased by 36% under Clinton? I gotcha...just throw nonsense bullshit out and try to make a point. Par for the course. Your boy the ascended mage does the same thing, as does GW, and Hedgehog the Wizard, wait, is there a pattern here? Quite the think tank you guys got cooking. Thanks for your "service" to the US.
kinda like the debt increased by 36% under Clinton? I gotcha...just throw nonsense bullshit out and try to make a point. Par for the course. Your boy the ascended mage does the same thing, as does GW, and Hedgehog the Wizard, wait, is there a pattern here? Quite the think tank you guys got cooking. Thanks for your "service" to the US.
If you'll remember my reply was to your insinuating debt went down under Clinton--you must have been watching CBS.
The national debt increased from 4.351 trillion to 5.77 trillion under Clinton--a far cry from declining.
+++++++++++++++++++
CBS?s Anthony Mason Wrongly Declares National Debt Declined Under Clinton
By Noel Sheppard | May 11, 2006 - 00:58 ET
In another example of journalists saying whatever they want whenever they want without regard to accuracy, CBS?s Anthony Mason on Wednesday?s ?Evening News? declared erroneously that America?s debt declined during the Clinton years (video link to follow). Certainly, this is a myth that has been purported by the media since Clinton left office?but nothing could be further from the truth.
Before we get to the facts of the matter, here?s the context. In an obvious effort to explain why the tax cuts accepted by the House on Wednesday were a terrible thing, the ?Evening News? followed its report concerning this issue with a discussion of the federal debt. Anchor Bob Schieffer passed the baton to business correspondent Anthony Mason who began with an interview with the real estate developer that created the national debt clock near Times Square in New York. After discussing the debt with this gentleman, and an economist, Mason stated: ?In the Clinton years, when our debt actually began to shrink the clock was turned off and covered up.?
Well, Anthony, the clock may have been covered up during this period, but the gross federal debt never declined during the Clinton years. Not once. According to the debt statistics at the Office of Management and Budget, the national debt
Story Continues Below Ad ↓
was $4.351 trillion prior to the first fiscal budget authorized by President Clinton in 1994. When he left office in 2001, the debt was $5.770 trillion at the end of that fiscal year. That looks like an increase to me, Anthony.
Furthermore, during the years when Clinton and Company were reporting so-called surpluses to America (1998 through 2001), the nation?s debt increased by almost exactly $400 billion, and went up every year even as we were being informed of surpluses as far as the eye can see.
As George Will would say, I guess the eye can?t see very far.
For those interested in facts the drive-by media have been hiding to further their own agenda, the last time our national debt actually declined was in fiscal 1969, and that was the first time since 1957. In fact, the debt has only decreased six years since 1940, with most of them occurring before the majority of America?s citizens were born.
What follows is a closed-captioning transcript of this segment along with a video link.
Bob Schieffer: Critics, as Sharyl and Gloria pointed out, remind us that any tax cut is just going to drive the national debt higher. And to broaden this out a little we want to turn now to our business correspondent Anthony Mason. Anthony, just for the record, how fast is the deficit going up?
Mason: Reporter: Bob, at the rate we're going, we're going to track ten trillion, that's with a "t," dollars by the end of the Bush presidency. $600 a second, that's how fast the national debt is growing on the national debt clock a block from New York?s Times Square. And at more than $8 trillion and counting, the clock can't keep up for long. You're running out of numbers.
Douglas Durst: We're running out of digits, yes.
Mason: Real estate developer Douglas Durst, the clock's owner, says he didn't plan on the debt reaching ten trillion. So, you figure you'll run out of space how soon?
Durst: Within two years.
Mason: The U.S. is in hock as deep as any nation in history. Who holds our I.O.U.S? Well, more than a quarter of our debt is now owed to foreign countries. Japan is our biggest foreign creditor. We've borrowed $673 billion from the Japanese. The Chinese are now number two.
Economist: Well, in a very real sense the Chinese central bank has financed our efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Mason: The bill for the war in Iraq exceeds $260 billion almost as much as we now owe the Chinese government.
Jim Grant: We are all at the mercy of the world's faith in us. The collateral for the dollar is the world's idea of America.
Mason: Jim Grant is the editor of "Grant's Interest Rate Observer." If they lose faith in us, we're in trouble.
Grant: Economists use a technical term?we would be cooked.
Mason: Here's why, if our foreign investors decided to move their money elsewhere we'd have to offer them higher interest rates. That would drive up our own interest rates, make it more expensive to buy homes and pay the mortgage and ultimately make us all poorer.
Economist: You do the math, it just doesn't work and something has got to change.
Mason: Of course, that's what everyone said when the debt clock was first unveiled in 1989 and we owed a mere two trillion. In the Clinton years, when our debt actually began to shrink the clock was turned off and covered up. Did you think you'd have to turn it back on again one day?
