CAN CALLAHAN... he sucks!

Randercity

Wait til HT
Forum Member
Inside the five... 4th down and up 3 and you try for a TD??? :nono: WHAT THE HELL are you thinking???

OBVIOUSLY I'm pissed because I have MINN and OVER in 2H. BUT why do you not go up at least 6 vs the MINN team. Luckily for them they got the turnover and just now get what may be a FG if the challenge is turned down, but how stupid is that.

I need a FG here and I'm looking great 2H in the afternoon games. NOW... challenge is lost, and they take 3 pts off the board and now go for it....

WTF!!!!!!!!:mad:
 

Wolver98

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 9, 2001
1,606
0
0
Tuscaloosa, Al
Hell, he lines up for a FG and then HE challenges the spot. He loses the challenge and then goes for a TD. What the F##K is up with that?
 

Randercity

Wait til HT
Forum Member
Yeah... yeah... NOW he looks like a genius, but that call on the original 4th down was still STUPID as HELL. I don't care who you bet or how you are sitting on the game, not going up by more than a FG with under 5 minutes is dumb.

Another MINN TO makes him look like a fricking GENIUS, but I'm not buying it.... he deserved to lose again. Based on how his teams have continually pissed away leads to win, I can understand why he did what he did, so now I have to hope CULPEPPER and CO can get another TD and make me a HUGE WINNER!

:cool:

hey BILL.... :moon:
 

Howie

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 9, 2001
1,250
0
0
Dallas, Tx
i completely feel your pain. i have minnesota in the 2nd half. they f'in blow. fumbles, interceptions... wtf is that all about.

did you just see Moss running down the field to make that catch? He just throws his hands up in the air and stops running instead of actually trying to catch a ball that looked pretty catchable to me.
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
rander:

i gotta disagree with you there.

if youre up by 3 and have the ball inside the 5 yard line, you go for it. if you fail, the opposition has to go 95 yards. if you kick the FG, yeah you go up 6 but then you gotta kick the ball off and normal starting field position on a kickoff is just about at the 30 yard line.

thats just my opinion. hope you get your winner
 

Wolver98

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 9, 2001
1,606
0
0
Tuscaloosa, Al
What about Tice? You need 10 pts, kick the FG, spike the ball to stop the clock, damn do something other than cost us the @nd half.
 

Juggler

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 19, 2002
31
0
0
I agree Tice dicision was DUMB! Kick the Field goal then try for the onside kick. He needs to go back to Football 1st grade.
 

Randercity

Wait til HT
Forum Member
GMAN2....

I agree with the 2nd decision... not the first. In the first instance you are going up by 6 more than likely and forcing the other team to score a TD to take the lead from you. Neither team could really stop the other except for turnovers, and if OAKLAND gives up the TD to MINN and can't move the ball close enough for the DATE RAPE DRUG GUY to hit one, well you don't deserve to be in the pros. MINNY has the worst DEE in NFL if you ask me, ask the last three teams they played that ran up 1100 yards and 117 pts! :eek:

Stupid call... or should I say desperate call by a desperate coach. He was wrong when they got stopped, and got lucky when he got the turnover my MINN. THEN, at the end, he challenges the spot, which was obviously not made, and then goes for it again AFTER his kicker had already made the kick.... yeah, it sucks! Even at that juncture, I say kick the FG and make them go all way from the 20. Janakowski can KICK it into the stands easy... make MINNY go 80 for a TD, not 60 yards for a tying FG.... YOU make the point of having to go 95, :nono:.... he would only have to go about 60 yards and kick the FG... big difference. The FG there makes them score a TD... which they had failed to do most of the day.

WHY am I so pissed... because I hate seeing stupid calls from over-paid idiots called coaches. ANOTHER example... COACH TICE.

WHY not kick the FG there in the end with 4th and 5. NO matter what happens, you need at least 10 pts. Get the 3 and then go for onside. DO you really think it's easier to get the onside if you're down only 3 than 7???? :confused: NO... the other team is probably gonna be more relaxed up 7 than 3... jmo. Anyway, you get pts when you can, and THEN wait and see what happens.

BTW... reason for my vent:

Cost me like $2000 since I had a big play on MINN, and a Round Robin Parlay with MINN, MINN OVER, DEN UNDER, SEA UNDER and had three in, needing only MINN. I still made a little, but went for the HR after a debacle of an early day in NFL. Could have got me way up, and allowed me to hedge a great deal on the SUN NITE GAME. I have a live 8 teamer going for a few grand needing only NE OVER and SAN FRAN. Wanted to play with the man's money and play a nickel teaser with NE UNDER to PITT or something and see what happens.... I would love going into MNF with a potential 2500 payday and NO way to lose!!! Oh well... I'm done. My crying is over... back to work.

:cool:
 
Last edited:

ELVIS

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 25, 2002
3,620
1
0
memphis
i love the raiders and i lost $$ betting against my own team. i honestly thought moss would have a big day. woodson looked like the guy we drafted 6 yrs ago. ??? the game comes down to how bad culpepper and the vikes def sucks. dante is terrible, an dthe minn def is just as bad. the raiders are not that good(i should know). minny will not make the playoffs again. guaranteed!!!!!:nono:
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top